{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"Turun HO 9.2.2017 138 - Ty\u00f6sopimus","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"T3MrAeFU9w\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/turun-ho-9-2-2017-138-tyosopimus\/\">Turun HO 9.2.2017 138 &#8211; Ty\u00f6sopimus<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/turun-ho-9-2-2017-138-tyosopimus\/embed\/#?secret=T3MrAeFU9w\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a Turun HO 9.2.2017 138 &#8211; Ty\u00f6sopimus \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"T3MrAeFU9w\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"RATKAISUN KESKEINEN SIS\u00c4LT\u00d6 Henkil\u00f6st\u00f6n vuokrausta harjoittava yhti\u00f6 (vuokrayritys) oli tehnyt ty\u00f6ntekij\u00f6iden kanssa m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4aikaisia ty\u00f6sopimuksia. Ty\u00f6sopimukset olivat p\u00e4\u00e4ttyneet viimeisten jatkosopimusten p\u00e4\u00e4tytty\u00e4 eik\u00e4 varsinaista ty\u00f6sopimusten irtisanomista tai purkamista ollut suoritettu. Kysymys sen arvioimisesta, oliko ty\u00f6sopimuksia pidett\u00e4v\u00e4 toistaiseksi voimassa olevina, oliko ty\u00f6ntekij\u00f6ill\u00e4 oikeus irtisanomisajan palkkaan ja lomakorvauksiin sek\u00e4 siit\u00e4, oliko ty\u00f6ntekij\u00f6ill\u00e4 oikeus korvaukseen ty\u00f6sopimuksen perusteettomasta p\u00e4\u00e4tt\u00e4misest\u00e4. Ty\u00f6ntekij\u00f6iden ja..."}