{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","provider_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","author_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","author_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","title":"Vaasan HO 11.2.2022 38 - Konkurssi","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"7ZzHloAYpT\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/vaasan-ho-11-2-2022-38-konkurssi\/\">Vaasan HO 11.2.2022 38 &#8211; Konkurssi<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/vaasan-ho-11-2-2022-38-konkurssi\/embed\/#?secret=7ZzHloAYpT\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u300a Vaasan HO 11.2.2022 38 &#8211; Konkurssi \u300b\u2014Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" data-secret=\"7ZzHloAYpT\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"RATKAISUN KESKEINEN SIS\u00c4LT\u00d6 Pankki oli siin\u00e4 tapauksessa, ett\u00e4 kuljetusyhti\u00f6lle my\u00f6nnet\u00e4\u00e4n liikenteen palveluista annetun lain mukainen liikennelupa, antanut yhti\u00f6n hyv\u00e4ksi omavelkaisen takauksen sellaisten saatavien maksamisesta, joiden suorittamiseen yhti\u00f6 oli ollut velvollinen ja jotka olivat syntyneet sen harjoittamasta luvanvaraisesta tieliikenteest\u00e4. Yhti\u00f6n jouduttua konkurssiin sen konkurssivelkojat olivat p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksell\u00e4\u00e4n katsoneet, ett\u00e4 pankilla oli ollut oikeus saada antamastaan takauksesta suoritus..."}