{"id":562488,"date":"2026-04-14T23:24:20","date_gmt":"2026-04-14T21:24:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-28-novembre-2024-n-2024-00031\/"},"modified":"2026-04-14T23:24:24","modified_gmt":"2026-04-14T21:24:24","slug":"cour-de-cassation-28-novembre-2024-n-2024-00031","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-28-novembre-2024-n-2024-00031\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation, 28 novembre 2024, n\u00b0 2024-00031"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>N\u00b0171\/ 2024p\u00e9nal du28.11.2024 Not.2178\/17\/CD Num\u00e9roCAS-2024-00031du registre LaCour de cassation du Grand-Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourga rendu en son audience publique du jeudi,vingt-huitnovembredeuxmillevingt-quatre, surle pourvoi de PERSONNE1.),demeurant \u00e0 L-ADRESSE1.), d\u00e9fendeur au civil, demandeuren cassation, comparant parMa\u00eetre Yusuf MEYNIOGLU, avocat \u00e0 la Cour,en l\u2019\u00e9tude duquel domicile est \u00e9lu, en pr\u00e9sence duMinist\u00e8re public et de PERSONNE2.),demeurant \u00e0 L-ADRESSE2.), demanderesse au civil, d\u00e9fenderesse en cassation, l\u2019arr\u00eat qui suit: Vu l\u2019arr\u00eatattaqu\u00e9 rendu le24janvier2024sous le num\u00e9ro26\/24X.parla Cour d\u2019appel du Grand-Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, dixi\u00e8me chambre,si\u00e9geant en mati\u00e8re correctionnelle; Vu le pourvoi en cassationau civilform\u00e9 parPERSONNE1.)suivant d\u00e9claration du23 f\u00e9vrier2024au greffe de la Cour sup\u00e9rieure deJustice;<\/p>\n<p>2 Vu le m\u00e9moire en cassation d\u00e9pos\u00e9 le25 mars2024au greffe de la Cour; Vu le m\u00e9moire en cassation signifi\u00e9 le 26 mars 2024 parPERSONNE1.)\u00e0 PERSONNE2.), d\u00e9pos\u00e9 le 21 mai 2024 au greffe de la Cour; Sur les conclusions duprocureur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral d\u2019Etat adjoint Marie-Jeanne KAPPWEILER. Surla recevabilit\u00e9 du pourvoi Le demandeur en cassation a uniquement introduit un pourvoi au civil. Aux termes de l\u2019article 43, alin\u00e9a3, de la loi modifi\u00e9e du 18 f\u00e9vrier 1885 sur les pourvois et la proc\u00e9dure en cassation(ci-apr\u00e8s\u00abla loi du 18 f\u00e9vrier 1885\u00bb), le m\u00e9moiredu d\u00e9fendeur au civildevra, \u00e0 peine de d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance, \u00eatre signifi\u00e9\u00e0 la partie civileavant d\u2019\u00eatre d\u00e9pos\u00e9. Lem\u00e9moire en cassation a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9pos\u00e9 au greffe de la Cour le 25 mars 2024, sans avoir \u00e9t\u00e9 signifi\u00e9 pr\u00e9alablement \u00e0 la d\u00e9fenderesse en cassation. Ila \u00e9t\u00e9 signifi\u00e9 \u00e0 la d\u00e9fenderesse en cassation le 26 mars 2024 et d\u00e9pos\u00e9 ensuite, ensemble l\u2019acte de signification,le 21 mai 2024,partant apr\u00e8s l\u2019expiration du d\u00e9lai d\u2019un mois pr\u00e9vu \u00e0 l\u2019article 43, alin\u00e9a 1,de la loi du 18 f\u00e9vrier 1885. Il s\u2019ensuit que le demandeur en cassation est d\u00e9chu de son pourvoi. PAR CES MOTIFS, la Cour de cassation d\u00e9clarele demandeur en cassation d\u00e9chu de son pourvoi au civil ; condamne le demandeur en cassation aux frais et d\u00e9pens de l\u2019instance en cassation. Ainsi jug\u00e9 par la Cour de cassation du Grand-Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg en son audience publique du jeudi,vingt-huit novembredeux mille vingt-quatre, \u00e0 la Cit\u00e9 Judiciaire, B\u00e2timent CR, Plateau du St. Esprit, compos\u00e9e de : Agn\u00e8s ZAGO, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, pr\u00e9sident, Marie-Laure MEYER, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Monique HENTGEN, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Jeanne GUILLAUME, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Carine FLAMMANG, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation,<\/p>\n<p>3 qui, \u00e0l\u2019exception du conseiller Marie-Laure MEYER, qui se trouvait dans l\u2019impossibilit\u00e9 de signer,ont sign\u00e9 le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eatavec le greffier \u00e0 la Cour Daniel SCHROEDER. La lecture du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite en la susdite audience publique par le conseillerAgn\u00e8s ZAGOen pr\u00e9sencedu procureur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral d\u2019Etat adjoint John PETRYet du greffier Daniel SCHROEDER.<\/p>\n<p>4 Conclusions du Parquet G\u00e9n\u00e9ral dans l\u2019affaire de cassation PERSONNE1.) contre PERSONNE2.) (CAS-2024-00031) Par d\u00e9claration faite le 23 f\u00e9vrier 2024 au greffe de la Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice, Ma\u00eetre Yusuf MEYNIOGLU, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, demeurant \u00e0 Luxembourg, forma au nom et pour le compte dePERSONNE1.)un recours en cassation contre un arr\u00eat n\u00b026\/04 rendu le 24 janvier 2024 par la Cour d\u2019appel, dixi\u00e8me chambre, si\u00e9geant en mati\u00e8re correctionnelle. Cette d\u00e9claration de recours a \u00e9t\u00e9 suivie en date du 25 mars 2024 du d\u00e9p\u00f4t au greffe de la Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice d\u2019un m\u00e9moire en cassation, sign\u00e9 par Ma\u00eetre Yusuf MEYNIOGLU, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, demeurant \u00e0 Luxembourg, au nom et pour le compte dePERSONNE1.). Le pourvoi respecte le d\u00e9lai d\u2019un mois courant \u00e0 partir du prononc\u00e9 de la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e danslequel la d\u00e9claration de pourvoi doit, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article 41 de la loi modifi\u00e9e du 18 f\u00e9vrier 1885 sur les pourvois et la proc\u00e9dure en cassation, intervenir. Il respecte en outre le d\u00e9lai d\u2019un mois, pr\u00e9vu par l\u2019article 43 de la loi du 18 f\u00e9vrier 1885, dans lequel la d\u00e9claration du pourvoi doit \u00eatre suivie du d\u00e9p\u00f4t d\u2019un m\u00e9moire en cassation. 1 Conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article 43 de la loi pr\u00e9cit\u00e9e, ce m\u00e9moire a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9 par un avocat la Cour et contient des moyens de cassation. Or, aux termes de l\u2019article43, alin\u00e9a 2, de la loi modifi\u00e9e du 18 f\u00e9vrier 1885 sur les pourvois et la proc\u00e9dure en cassation, le m\u00e9moire du d\u00e9fendeur au civil devra, sous peine de d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance, \u00eatre signifi\u00e9 \u00e0 la partie civile avant d\u2019\u00eatre d\u00e9pos\u00e9. Un premier m\u00e9moire en cassation a \u00e9t\u00e9d\u00e9pos\u00e9 au greffe de la Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice le 25 mars 2024, sans avoir \u00e9t\u00e9 pr\u00e9alablement signifi\u00e9 \u00e0 la partie civile. 1 Le d\u00e9lai d\u2019un mois aurait a prioriexpir\u00e9 le 23 mars 2024, mais le 23 mars 2024 tombait sur un samedi. Conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la Convention europ\u00e9enne sur la computation des d\u00e9lais, sign\u00e9e \u00e0 B\u00e2le le 16 mai 1972, le d\u00e9lai \u00e9tait prorog\u00e9 au premier jour ouvrable, qui \u00e9tait lelundi 25 mars 2024.<\/p>\n<p>5 Le non-respect de cette formalit\u00e9 entra\u00eene la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance du pourvoi pour autant qu\u2019il vise l\u2019action civile. En l\u2019occurrence, lem\u00e9moire a \u00e9t\u00e9 signifi\u00e9 le 26 mars 2024 \u00e0 la partie civile, mais a seulement \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9pos\u00e9 une deuxi\u00e8me fois avec l\u2019acte de signification le 21 mai 2024, partant apr\u00e8s l\u2019expiration du d\u00e9lai d\u2019un mois pr\u00e9vu \u00e0 l\u2019article43, alin\u00e9a 2, de la loi modifi\u00e9e du 18 f\u00e9vrier 1885 sur les pourvois et la proc\u00e9dure en cassation. Conclusion: Le demandeur en cassation est \u00e0 d\u00e9clarer d\u00e9chu de son pourvoi au civil, sinon le pourvoi est irrecevable pour \u00eatre tardif. Pour le Procureur G\u00e9n\u00e9ral d\u2019\u00c9tat Le Procureur G\u00e9n\u00e9ral d\u2019Etat adjoint Marie-Jeanne Kappweiler<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/data.public.lu\/fr\/datasets\/cour-de-cassation\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/download.data.public.lu\/resources\/cour-de-cassation\/20241202-031809\/20241128-cas-2024-00031-171-pseudonymise-accessible.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Licence CC BY-ND 4.0 (Administration judiciaire, data.public.lu). Republication autorisee avec attribution, sans modification editoriale du texte integral.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>N\u00b0171\/ 2024p\u00e9nal du28.11.2024 Not.2178\/17\/CD Num\u00e9roCAS-2024-00031du registre LaCour de cassation du Grand-Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourga rendu en son audience publique du jeudi,vingt-huitnovembredeuxmillevingt-quatre, surle pourvoi de PERSONNE1.),demeurant \u00e0 L-ADRESSE1.), d\u00e9fendeur au civil, demandeuren cassation, comparant parMa\u00eetre Yusuf MEYNIOGLU, avocat \u00e0 la Cour,en l\u2019\u00e9tude duquel domicile est \u00e9lu, en\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[8418],"kji_court":[8423],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[8677],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8424,8576,8425],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-562488","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-luxembourg","kji_court-cour-de-cassation","kji_year-8677","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-novembre","kji_keyword-penal","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.8 (Yoast SEO v27.8) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour de cassation, 28 novembre 2024, n\u00b0 2024-00031 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-28-novembre-2024-n-2024-00031\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation, 28 novembre 2024, n\u00b0 2024-00031\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"N\u00b0171\/ 2024p\u00e9nal du28.11.2024 Not.2178\/17\/CD Num\u00e9roCAS-2024-00031du registre LaCour de cassation du Grand-Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourga rendu en son audience publique du jeudi,vingt-huitnovembredeuxmillevingt-quatre, surle pourvoi de PERSONNE1.),demeurant \u00e0 L-ADRESSE1.), d\u00e9fendeur au civil, demandeuren cassation, comparant parMa\u00eetre Yusuf MEYNIOGLU, avocat \u00e0 la Cour,en l\u2019\u00e9tude duquel domicile est \u00e9lu, en\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-28-novembre-2024-n-2024-00031\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-14T21:24:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-28-novembre-2024-n-2024-00031\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-28-novembre-2024-n-2024-00031\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 28 novembre 2024, n\u00b0 2024-00031 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-14T21:24:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-14T21:24:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-28-novembre-2024-n-2024-00031\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-28-novembre-2024-n-2024-00031\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-28-novembre-2024-n-2024-00031\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 28 novembre 2024, n\u00b0 2024-00031\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation, 28 novembre 2024, n\u00b0 2024-00031 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-28-novembre-2024-n-2024-00031\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation, 28 novembre 2024, n\u00b0 2024-00031","og_description":"N\u00b0171\/ 2024p\u00e9nal du28.11.2024 Not.2178\/17\/CD Num\u00e9roCAS-2024-00031du registre LaCour de cassation du Grand-Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourga rendu en son audience publique du jeudi,vingt-huitnovembredeuxmillevingt-quatre, surle pourvoi de PERSONNE1.),demeurant \u00e0 L-ADRESSE1.), d\u00e9fendeur au civil, demandeuren cassation, comparant parMa\u00eetre Yusuf MEYNIOGLU, avocat \u00e0 la Cour,en l\u2019\u00e9tude duquel domicile est \u00e9lu, en\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-28-novembre-2024-n-2024-00031\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-04-14T21:24:24+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"5 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-28-novembre-2024-n-2024-00031\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-28-novembre-2024-n-2024-00031\/","name":"Cour de cassation, 28 novembre 2024, n\u00b0 2024-00031 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-14T21:24:20+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-14T21:24:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-28-novembre-2024-n-2024-00031\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-28-novembre-2024-n-2024-00031\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-28-novembre-2024-n-2024-00031\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation, 28 novembre 2024, n\u00b0 2024-00031"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/562488","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=562488"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=562488"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=562488"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=562488"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=562488"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=562488"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=562488"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=562488"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}