{"id":562633,"date":"2026-04-14T23:43:17","date_gmt":"2026-04-14T21:43:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/bgh-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-vom-18-03-2026-i-zb-108-25\/"},"modified":"2026-04-14T23:43:17","modified_gmt":"2026-04-14T21:43:17","slug":"bgh-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-vom-18-03-2026-i-zb-108-25","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/bgh-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-vom-18-03-2026-i-zb-108-25\/","title":{"rendered":"BGH 1. Zivilsenat, Beschluss vom 18.03.2026, I ZB 108\/25"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<h3>Tenor<\/h3>\n<div>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p>Die Erinnerung des Schuldners gegen den Kostenansatz des Bundesgerichtshofs gem\u00e4\u00df Kostenrechnung vom 26.\u00a0Februar 2026 &#8211;\u00a0Kassenzeichen 780026106701\u00a0&#8211; wird zur\u00fcckgewiesen.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl><\/div>\n<h3>Gr\u00fcnde<\/h3>\n<div>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt>\n               <a name=\"rd_1\">1<\/a>\n            <\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p>I. Die gem\u00e4\u00df \u00a7\u00a066 Abs.\u00a01 Satz\u00a01 GKG statthafte und auch ansonsten zul\u00e4ssige Erinnerung des Schuldners, \u00fcber die beim Bundesgerichtshof gem\u00e4\u00df \u00a7\u00a01 Abs.\u00a05, \u00a7\u00a066 Abs.\u00a06 Satz\u00a01 GKG grunds\u00e4tzlich die Einzelrichterin oder der Einzelrichter entscheidet (vgl. BGH, <span style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51)\">Beschluss vom 12.\u00a0Dezember 2025 &#8211;\u00a0I\u00a0ZB 77\/25, juris Rn.\u00a04 mwN)<\/span>, hat keinen Erfolg.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt>\n               <a name=\"rd_2\">2<\/a>\n            <\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p>Der Kostenansatz trifft zu. Infolge der Verwerfung der Rechtsbeschwerde durch den Senatsbeschluss vom 10.\u00a0Februar 2026 ist die Geb\u00fchr nach Nr.\u00a02124 des Kostenverzeichnisses (Anlage\u00a01 zum GKG) in H\u00f6he von 72\u00a0\u20ac angefallen. Die <span style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51)\">Form der Kostenrechnung entspricht den Vorgaben des \u00a7\u00a025 Abs.\u00a02 KostVfg.<\/span>\n               <\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt>\n               <a name=\"rd_3\">3<\/a>\n            <\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p>II. Das Erinnerungsverfahren ist gerichtsgeb\u00fchrenfrei (\u00a7\u00a066 Abs.\u00a08 Satz\u00a01 GKG).<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt>\n               <a name=\"rd_4\">4<\/a>\n            <\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p>III. Der Schuldner wird darauf hingewiesen, dass der Senat in Zukunft vergleichbare &#8211;\u00a0offensichtlich unzul\u00e4ssige, substanzlose oder rechtsmissbr\u00e4uchliche\u00a0&#8211; Eingaben nicht mehr bescheiden wird. Der Senat muss es nicht hinnehmen, durch sinnentleerte Inanspruchnahme seiner Arbeitskapazit\u00e4ten bei der Erf\u00fcllung seiner Aufgaben behindert zu werden (vgl. BGH, Beschluss vom 2.\u00a0November 2017 &#8211;\u00a0I\u00a0ZB\u00a014\/16, juris Rn.\u00a03; Beschluss vom 6.\u00a0Juni 2018 &#8211;\u00a0EnZB\u00a09\/18, juris Rn.\u00a02; Beschluss vom 22.\u00a0April 2021 &#8211;\u00a0III\u00a0ZB\u00a021\/21, juris Rn.\u00a03; Beschluss vom 7.\u00a0September 2021 &#8211;\u00a0V\u00a0ZB\u00a049\/21, juris Rn.\u00a02\u00a0f.; vgl. auch BVerfG, Beschluss vom 29.\u00a0Juni 2010 &#8211;\u00a01\u00a0BvR\u00a02358\/08, juris Rn.\u00a06; Beschluss vom 23.\u00a0Februar 2016 &#8211;\u00a02\u00a0BvR\u00a060\/16 und 2\u00a0BvR\u00a063\/16, juris Rn.\u00a03).<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p>\n                  <span>Wille<\/span>\n               <\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"http:\/\/www.rechtsprechung-im-internet.de\/jportal\/?quelle=jlink&#038;docid=jb-KORE706152026&#038;psml=bsjrsprod.psml&#038;max=true\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rechtsprechung-im-internet.de\/jportal\/portal\/page\/bsjrsprod.psml\/screen\/JWPDFScreen\/filename\/BGH_I_ZB_108-25_KORE706152026.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Rechtsprechung im Internet (BMJV\/BfJ) : les decisions sont mises a disposition gratuitement en HTML, PDF et XML pour libre utilisation et re-utilisation.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tenor Die Erinnerung des Schuldners gegen den Kostenansatz des Bundesgerichtshofs gem\u00e4\u00df Kostenrechnung vom 26. Februar 2026 &#8211; Kassenzeichen 780026106701 &#8211; wird zur\u00fcckgewiesen. Gr\u00fcnde 1 I. Die gem\u00e4\u00df \u00a7 66 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG statthafte und auch ansonsten zul\u00e4ssige Erinnerung des Schuldners, \u00fcber die beim Bundesgerichtshof gem\u00e4\u00df \u00a7 1 Abs. 5, \u00a7 66 Abs. 6 Satz 1 GKG grunds\u00e4tzlich die&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7802],"kji_court":[7803],"kji_chamber":[8404],"kji_year":[7610],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7808,7809,7807],"kji_language":[7805],"class_list":["post-562633","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-allemagne","kji_court-bundesgerichtshof","kji_chamber-1-zivilsenat","kji_year-7610","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-beschluss","kji_keyword-tenor","kji_keyword-zivilsenat","kji_language-allemand"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>BGH 1. Zivilsenat, Beschluss vom 18.03.2026, I ZB 108\/25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/bgh-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-vom-18-03-2026-i-zb-108-25\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"BGH 1. Zivilsenat, Beschluss vom 18.03.2026, I ZB 108\/25\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tenor Die Erinnerung des Schuldners gegen den Kostenansatz des Bundesgerichtshofs gem\u00e4\u00df Kostenrechnung vom 26. Februar 2026 - Kassenzeichen 780026106701 - wird zur\u00fcckgewiesen. Gr\u00fcnde 1 I. Die gem\u00e4\u00df \u00a7 66 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG statthafte und auch ansonsten zul\u00e4ssige Erinnerung des Schuldners, \u00fcber die beim Bundesgerichtshof gem\u00e4\u00df \u00a7 1 Abs. 5, \u00a7 66 Abs. 6 Satz 1 GKG grunds\u00e4tzlich die...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/bgh-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-vom-18-03-2026-i-zb-108-25\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bgh-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-vom-18-03-2026-i-zb-108-25\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bgh-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-vom-18-03-2026-i-zb-108-25\\\/\",\"name\":\"BGH 1. Zivilsenat, Beschluss vom 18.03.2026, I ZB 108\\\/25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-14T21:43:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bgh-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-vom-18-03-2026-i-zb-108-25\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bgh-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-vom-18-03-2026-i-zb-108-25\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bgh-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-vom-18-03-2026-i-zb-108-25\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"BGH 1. Zivilsenat, Beschluss vom 18.03.2026, I ZB 108\\\/25\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"BGH 1. Zivilsenat, Beschluss vom 18.03.2026, I ZB 108\/25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/bgh-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-vom-18-03-2026-i-zb-108-25\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"BGH 1. Zivilsenat, Beschluss vom 18.03.2026, I ZB 108\/25","og_description":"Tenor Die Erinnerung des Schuldners gegen den Kostenansatz des Bundesgerichtshofs gem\u00e4\u00df Kostenrechnung vom 26. Februar 2026 - Kassenzeichen 780026106701 - wird zur\u00fcckgewiesen. Gr\u00fcnde 1 I. Die gem\u00e4\u00df \u00a7 66 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG statthafte und auch ansonsten zul\u00e4ssige Erinnerung des Schuldners, \u00fcber die beim Bundesgerichtshof gem\u00e4\u00df \u00a7 1 Abs. 5, \u00a7 66 Abs. 6 Satz 1 GKG grunds\u00e4tzlich die...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/bgh-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-vom-18-03-2026-i-zb-108-25\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"1 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/bgh-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-vom-18-03-2026-i-zb-108-25\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/bgh-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-vom-18-03-2026-i-zb-108-25\/","name":"BGH 1. Zivilsenat, Beschluss vom 18.03.2026, I ZB 108\/25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-14T21:43:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/bgh-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-vom-18-03-2026-i-zb-108-25\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/bgh-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-vom-18-03-2026-i-zb-108-25\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/bgh-1-zivilsenat-beschluss-vom-18-03-2026-i-zb-108-25\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"BGH 1. Zivilsenat, Beschluss vom 18.03.2026, I ZB 108\/25"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/562633","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=562633"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=562633"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=562633"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=562633"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=562633"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=562633"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=562633"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=562633"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}