{"id":566079,"date":"2026-04-15T07:59:10","date_gmt":"2026-04-15T05:59:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/bgh-2-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-14-01-2026-2-ars-468-25-2\/"},"modified":"2026-04-15T07:59:10","modified_gmt":"2026-04-15T05:59:10","slug":"bgh-2-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-14-01-2026-2-ars-468-25-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/bgh-2-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-14-01-2026-2-ars-468-25-2\/","title":{"rendered":"BGH 2. Strafsenat, Beschluss vom 14.01.2026, 2 ARs 468\/25"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<h3>Tenor<\/h3>\n<div>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p>1. Die Beschwerde des Beschwerdef\u00fchrers gegen den Beschluss des Oberlandesgerichts Hamm vom 2. September 2025 \u2012 Az.: III &#8211; 5 Ws 367\/25 \u2012 wird auf seine Kosten als unzul\u00e4ssig verworfen, weil dieser Beschluss nicht mit der Beschwerde angefochten werden kann (\u00a7 310 Abs. 2 StPO).<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p>2. Die mit Schreiben vom 17. November 2025 beantragte Akteneinsicht sowie die begehrte Fristverl\u00e4ngerung werden abgelehnt.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl><\/div>\n<h3>Gr\u00fcnde<\/h3>\n<div>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt>\n               <a name=\"rd_1\">1<\/a>\n            <\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p>Der Antrag auf Gew\u00e4hrung von Akteneinsicht wird abgelehnt, weil es f\u00fcr die Entscheidung \u00fcber diesen Antrag an einer Zust\u00e4ndigkeit des Senats fehlt. Nach rechtskr\u00e4ftigem Abschluss des Verfahrens obliegt die Entscheidung \u00fcber die Gew\u00e4hrung von Akteneinsicht nach \u00a7 147 Abs. 5 StPO der Staatsanwaltschaft. Im \u00dcbrigen berechtigt die Einlegung eines offensichtlich unzul\u00e4ssigen bzw. unstatthaften Rechtsmittels nicht zur Akteneinsicht (BGH, Beschluss vom 5. Februar 2020 &#8211; 2 ARs 327\/19, Rn. 2; vgl. auch BFH, Beschluss vom 17. Dezember 2002 &#8211; X B 136\/02, Rn. 9 mwN). Vor diesem Hintergrund bestand auch kein Anlass f\u00fcr eine Fristverl\u00e4ngerung.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<table class=\"Rsp\">\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"text-align:left\">Menges\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"text-align:left\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"text-align:left\">Grube\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"text-align:left\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\" valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"text-align:left\">Schmidt<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"http:\/\/www.rechtsprechung-im-internet.de\/jportal\/?quelle=jlink&#038;docid=jb-KORE605112026&#038;psml=bsjrsprod.psml&#038;max=true\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rechtsprechung-im-internet.de\/jportal\/portal\/page\/bsjrsprod.psml\/screen\/JWPDFScreen\/filename\/BGH_2_ARs_468-25_KORE605112026.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Rechtsprechung im Internet (BMJV\/BfJ) : les decisions sont mises a disposition gratuitement en HTML, PDF et XML pour libre utilisation et re-utilisation.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tenor 1. Die Beschwerde des Beschwerdef\u00fchrers gegen den Beschluss des Oberlandesgerichts Hamm vom 2. September 2025 \u2012 Az.: III &#8211; 5 Ws 367\/25 \u2012 wird auf seine Kosten als unzul\u00e4ssig verworfen, weil dieser Beschluss nicht mit der Beschwerde angefochten werden kann (\u00a7 310 Abs. 2 StPO). 2. Die mit Schreiben vom 17. November 2025 beantragte Akteneinsicht sowie die begehrte Fristverl\u00e4ngerung&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7802],"kji_court":[7803],"kji_chamber":[10030],"kji_year":[7610],"kji_subject":[7632],"kji_keyword":[7808,8712,7809],"kji_language":[7805],"class_list":["post-566079","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-allemagne","kji_court-bundesgerichtshof","kji_chamber-2-strafsenat","kji_year-7610","kji_subject-penal","kji_keyword-beschluss","kji_keyword-strafsenat","kji_keyword-tenor","kji_language-allemand"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>BGH 2. Strafsenat, Beschluss vom 14.01.2026, 2 ARs 468\/25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/bgh-2-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-14-01-2026-2-ars-468-25-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"BGH 2. Strafsenat, Beschluss vom 14.01.2026, 2 ARs 468\/25\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tenor 1. Die Beschwerde des Beschwerdef\u00fchrers gegen den Beschluss des Oberlandesgerichts Hamm vom 2. September 2025 \u2012 Az.: III - 5 Ws 367\/25 \u2012 wird auf seine Kosten als unzul\u00e4ssig verworfen, weil dieser Beschluss nicht mit der Beschwerde angefochten werden kann (\u00a7 310 Abs. 2 StPO). 2. Die mit Schreiben vom 17. November 2025 beantragte Akteneinsicht sowie die begehrte Fristverl\u00e4ngerung...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/bgh-2-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-14-01-2026-2-ars-468-25-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bgh-2-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-14-01-2026-2-ars-468-25-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bgh-2-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-14-01-2026-2-ars-468-25-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"BGH 2. Strafsenat, Beschluss vom 14.01.2026, 2 ARs 468\\\/25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-15T05:59:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bgh-2-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-14-01-2026-2-ars-468-25-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bgh-2-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-14-01-2026-2-ars-468-25-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bgh-2-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-14-01-2026-2-ars-468-25-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"BGH 2. Strafsenat, Beschluss vom 14.01.2026, 2 ARs 468\\\/25\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"BGH 2. Strafsenat, Beschluss vom 14.01.2026, 2 ARs 468\/25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/bgh-2-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-14-01-2026-2-ars-468-25-2\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"BGH 2. Strafsenat, Beschluss vom 14.01.2026, 2 ARs 468\/25","og_description":"Tenor 1. Die Beschwerde des Beschwerdef\u00fchrers gegen den Beschluss des Oberlandesgerichts Hamm vom 2. September 2025 \u2012 Az.: III - 5 Ws 367\/25 \u2012 wird auf seine Kosten als unzul\u00e4ssig verworfen, weil dieser Beschluss nicht mit der Beschwerde angefochten werden kann (\u00a7 310 Abs. 2 StPO). 2. Die mit Schreiben vom 17. November 2025 beantragte Akteneinsicht sowie die begehrte Fristverl\u00e4ngerung...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/bgh-2-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-14-01-2026-2-ars-468-25-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"1 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/bgh-2-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-14-01-2026-2-ars-468-25-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/bgh-2-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-14-01-2026-2-ars-468-25-2\/","name":"BGH 2. Strafsenat, Beschluss vom 14.01.2026, 2 ARs 468\/25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-15T05:59:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/bgh-2-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-14-01-2026-2-ars-468-25-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/bgh-2-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-14-01-2026-2-ars-468-25-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/bgh-2-strafsenat-beschluss-vom-14-01-2026-2-ars-468-25-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"BGH 2. Strafsenat, Beschluss vom 14.01.2026, 2 ARs 468\/25"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/566079","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=566079"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=566079"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=566079"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=566079"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=566079"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=566079"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=566079"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=566079"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}