{"id":604559,"date":"2026-04-19T12:02:23","date_gmt":"2026-04-19T10:02:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-733-20-5t8eps-a-g1-s1-2024-01-25\/"},"modified":"2026-04-19T12:02:23","modified_gmt":"2026-04-19T10:02:23","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-733-20-5t8eps-a-g1-s1-2024-01-25","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-733-20-5t8eps-a-g1-s1-2024-01-25\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 733\/20.5T8EPS-A.G1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-25"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: MARIA DA GRA?A TRIGO. I. Os princ?pios da confian?a e da lealdade processual n?o permitem que, em processo de invent?rio (cfr. art. 1123.?, n.? 2, al. b), do CPC), o ac?rd?o recorrido recuse conhecer o objecto do recurso de apela??o da decis?o sobre a reclama??o da rela??o de bens, quando, anteriormente, foi proferido despacho do relator em termos que legitimam a leitura apresentada pela recorrente, segundo a qual aquele recurso seria conhecido, fosse com o recurso de apela??o do despacho determinativo da forma ? partilha, independentemente de quem o apresentasse, fosse ?ap?s o tr?nsito em julgado? desse despacho, caso dele n?o fosse interposto recurso. II. O facto de ambos os c?njuges inventariados terem outorgado testamento em simult?neo, deixando, cada um deles, com a autoriza??o do outro, ?metade indivisa? do mesmo bem im?vel a uma das filhas, indicia, na impossibilidade de realizarem um testamento de m?o comum (cfr. art. 2181.? do CC), uma concerta??o de vontades entre eles no sentido de legar o bem, na sua totalidade, ? dita filha, e n?o a vontade de legar apenas metade do bem im?vel.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: MARIA DA GRA?A TRIGO. I. Os princ?pios da confian?a e da lealdade processual n?o permitem que, em processo de invent?rio (cfr. art. 1123.?, n.? 2, al. b), do CPC), o ac?rd?o recorrido recuse conhecer o objecto do recurso de apela??o da decis?o sobre a reclama??o da rela??o de bens, quando, anteriormente, foi proferido despacho do relator em termos que legitimam a leitura apresentada pela recorrente, segundo a qual aquele recurso seria conhecido, fosse com o recurso de apela??o do despacho determinativo da forma ? partilha, independentemente de quem o apresentasse, fosse ?ap?s o tr?nsito em julgado? desse despacho, caso dele n?o fosse interposto recurso. II. O facto de ambos os c?njuges inventariados terem outorgado testamento em simult?neo, deixando, cada um deles, com a autoriza??o do outro, ?metade indivisa? do mesmo bem im?vel a uma das filhas, indicia, na impossibilidade de realizarem um testamento de m?o comum (cfr. art. 2181.? do CC), uma concerta??o de vontades entre eles no sentido de legar o bem, na sua totalidade, ? dita filha, e n?o a vontade de legar apenas metade do bem im?vel.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8784],"kji_year":[8677],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-604559","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-2-seco","kji_year-8677","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 733\/20.5T8EPS-A.G1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-733-20-5t8eps-a-g1-s1-2024-01-25\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 733\/20.5T8EPS-A.G1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-25\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: MARIA DA GRA?A TRIGO. I. Os princ?pios da confian?a e da lealdade processual n?o permitem que, em processo de invent?rio (cfr. art. 1123.?, n.? 2, al. b), do CPC), o ac?rd?o recorrido recuse conhecer o objecto do recurso de apela??o da decis?o sobre a reclama??o da rela??o de bens, quando, anteriormente, foi proferido despacho do relator em termos que legitimam a leitura apresentada pela recorrente, segundo a qual aquele recurso seria conhecido, fosse com o recurso de apela??o do despacho determinativo da forma ? partilha, independentemente de quem o apresentasse, fosse ?ap?s o tr?nsito em julgado? desse despacho, caso dele n?o fosse interposto recurso. II. O facto de ambos os c?njuges inventariados terem outorgado testamento em simult?neo, deixando, cada um deles, com a autoriza??o do outro, ?metade indivisa? do mesmo bem im?vel a uma das filhas, indicia, na impossibilidade de realizarem um testamento de m?o comum (cfr. art. 2181.? do CC), uma concerta??o de vontades entre eles no sentido de legar o bem, na sua totalidade, ? dita filha, e n?o a vontade de legar apenas metade do bem im?vel.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-733-20-5t8eps-a-g1-s1-2024-01-25\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-733-20-5t8eps-a-g1-s1-2024-01-25\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-733-20-5t8eps-a-g1-s1-2024-01-25\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 733\\\/20.5T8EPS-A.G1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-19T10:02:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-733-20-5t8eps-a-g1-s1-2024-01-25\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-733-20-5t8eps-a-g1-s1-2024-01-25\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-733-20-5t8eps-a-g1-s1-2024-01-25\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 733\\\/20.5T8EPS-A.G1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-25\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 733\/20.5T8EPS-A.G1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-733-20-5t8eps-a-g1-s1-2024-01-25\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 733\/20.5T8EPS-A.G1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-25","og_description":"Relator: MARIA DA GRA?A TRIGO. I. Os princ?pios da confian?a e da lealdade processual n?o permitem que, em processo de invent?rio (cfr. art. 1123.?, n.? 2, al. b), do CPC), o ac?rd?o recorrido recuse conhecer o objecto do recurso de apela??o da decis?o sobre a reclama??o da rela??o de bens, quando, anteriormente, foi proferido despacho do relator em termos que legitimam a leitura apresentada pela recorrente, segundo a qual aquele recurso seria conhecido, fosse com o recurso de apela??o do despacho determinativo da forma ? partilha, independentemente de quem o apresentasse, fosse ?ap?s o tr?nsito em julgado? desse despacho, caso dele n?o fosse interposto recurso. II. O facto de ambos os c?njuges inventariados terem outorgado testamento em simult?neo, deixando, cada um deles, com a autoriza??o do outro, ?metade indivisa? do mesmo bem im?vel a uma das filhas, indicia, na impossibilidade de realizarem um testamento de m?o comum (cfr. art. 2181.? do CC), uma concerta??o de vontades entre eles no sentido de legar o bem, na sua totalidade, ? dita filha, e n?o a vontade de legar apenas metade do bem im?vel.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-733-20-5t8eps-a-g1-s1-2024-01-25\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"1 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-733-20-5t8eps-a-g1-s1-2024-01-25\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-733-20-5t8eps-a-g1-s1-2024-01-25\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 733\/20.5T8EPS-A.G1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-19T10:02:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-733-20-5t8eps-a-g1-s1-2024-01-25\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-733-20-5t8eps-a-g1-s1-2024-01-25\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-733-20-5t8eps-a-g1-s1-2024-01-25\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 733\/20.5T8EPS-A.G1.S1 \u2013 2024-01-25"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/604559","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=604559"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=604559"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=604559"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=604559"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=604559"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=604559"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=604559"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=604559"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}