{"id":606504,"date":"2026-04-19T14:48:43","date_gmt":"2026-04-19T12:48:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2808-19-4t8ptm-e1-s1-2023-12-19\/"},"modified":"2026-04-19T14:48:43","modified_gmt":"2026-04-19T12:48:43","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2808-19-4t8ptm-e1-s1-2023-12-19","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2808-19-4t8ptm-e1-s1-2023-12-19\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2808\/19.4T8PTM.E1.S1 \u2013 2023-12-19"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: MARIA CLARA SOTTOMAYOR. I ? O aditamento de um ponto ? factualidade provada, que n?o teve reflexo na decis?o final, com o objetivo de explicitar o conte?do de um documento junto aos autos que n?o foi impugnado, n?o ? apto a descaraterizar a dupla conformidade. II ? N?o basta para afastar o obst?culo da dupla conforme impeditivo do recurso de revista, nos termos do n.? 3 do artigo 671.? do CPC, que a senten?a e o ac?rd?o apresentem fundamenta??o diferente; exige-se que essa diferen?a seja essencial. III ? A diferen?a de fundamenta??o entre o tribunal de 1.? inst?ncia e o ac?rd?o recorrido n?o ? essencial, se o ac?rd?o recorrido decidiu negar a indemniza??o ? autora, por ter entendido que da mat?ria de facto decorre que houve justa causa de exonera??o da administradora de condom?nio, nos termos do n.? 3 do artigo 1435.? do C?digo Civil, e a senten?a, prescindindo de qualquer considera??o de direito acerca da no??o de justa causa (mas tendo fixado os factos integradores do conceito de justa causa), entendeu, com base no n.? 1 do artigo 1435.? do C?digo Civil, que a exonera??o exercida atrav?s de delibera??o da assembleia geral de cond?minos, desde que n?o impugnada, n?o faz nascer na esfera jur?dica da autora o direito de indemniza??o. IV ? Para apreender o sentido da fundamenta??o, ? necess?rio proceder a uma interpreta??o dos fundamentos da senten?a e do ac?rd?o recorrido.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: MARIA CLARA SOTTOMAYOR. I ? O aditamento de um ponto ? factualidade provada, que n?o teve reflexo na decis?o final, com o objetivo de explicitar o conte?do de um documento junto aos autos que n?o foi impugnado, n?o ? apto a descaraterizar a dupla conformidade. II ? N?o basta para afastar o obst?culo da dupla conforme impeditivo do recurso de revista, nos termos do n.? 3 do artigo 671.? do CPC, que a senten?a e o ac?rd?o apresentem fundamenta??o diferente; exige-se que essa diferen?a seja essencial. III ? A diferen?a de fundamenta??o entre o tribunal de 1.? inst?ncia e o ac?rd?o recorrido n?o ? essencial, se o ac?rd?o recorrido decidiu negar a indemniza??o ? autora, por ter entendido que da mat?ria de facto decorre que houve justa causa de exonera??o da administradora de condom?nio, nos termos do n.? 3 do artigo 1435.? do C?digo Civil, e a senten?a, prescindindo de qualquer considera??o de direito acerca da no??o de justa causa (mas tendo fixado os factos integradores do conceito de justa causa), entendeu, com base no n.? 1 do artigo 1435.? do C?digo Civil, que a exonera??o exercida atrav?s de delibera??o da assembleia geral de cond?minos, desde que n?o impugnada, n?o faz nascer na esfera jur?dica da autora o direito de indemniza??o. IV ? Para apreender o sentido da fundamenta??o, ? necess?rio proceder a uma interpreta??o dos fundamentos da senten?a e do ac?rd?o recorrido.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[9174],"kji_year":[24566],"kji_subject":[7650],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-606504","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-1-seco","kji_year-24566","kji_subject-administratif","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2808\/19.4T8PTM.E1.S1 \u2013 2023-12-19 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2808-19-4t8ptm-e1-s1-2023-12-19\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2808\/19.4T8PTM.E1.S1 \u2013 2023-12-19\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: MARIA CLARA SOTTOMAYOR. I ? O aditamento de um ponto ? factualidade provada, que n?o teve reflexo na decis?o final, com o objetivo de explicitar o conte?do de um documento junto aos autos que n?o foi impugnado, n?o ? apto a descaraterizar a dupla conformidade. II ? N?o basta para afastar o obst?culo da dupla conforme impeditivo do recurso de revista, nos termos do n.? 3 do artigo 671.? do CPC, que a senten?a e o ac?rd?o apresentem fundamenta??o diferente; exige-se que essa diferen?a seja essencial. III ? A diferen?a de fundamenta??o entre o tribunal de 1.? inst?ncia e o ac?rd?o recorrido n?o ? essencial, se o ac?rd?o recorrido decidiu negar a indemniza??o ? autora, por ter entendido que da mat?ria de facto decorre que houve justa causa de exonera??o da administradora de condom?nio, nos termos do n.? 3 do artigo 1435.? do C?digo Civil, e a senten?a, prescindindo de qualquer considera??o de direito acerca da no??o de justa causa (mas tendo fixado os factos integradores do conceito de justa causa), entendeu, com base no n.? 1 do artigo 1435.? do C?digo Civil, que a exonera??o exercida atrav?s de delibera??o da assembleia geral de cond?minos, desde que n?o impugnada, n?o faz nascer na esfera jur?dica da autora o direito de indemniza??o. IV ? Para apreender o sentido da fundamenta??o, ? necess?rio proceder a uma interpreta??o dos fundamentos da senten?a e do ac?rd?o recorrido.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2808-19-4t8ptm-e1-s1-2023-12-19\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2808-19-4t8ptm-e1-s1-2023-12-19\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2808-19-4t8ptm-e1-s1-2023-12-19\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2808\\\/19.4T8PTM.E1.S1 \u2013 2023-12-19 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-19T12:48:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2808-19-4t8ptm-e1-s1-2023-12-19\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2808-19-4t8ptm-e1-s1-2023-12-19\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2808-19-4t8ptm-e1-s1-2023-12-19\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2808\\\/19.4T8PTM.E1.S1 \u2013 2023-12-19\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2808\/19.4T8PTM.E1.S1 \u2013 2023-12-19 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2808-19-4t8ptm-e1-s1-2023-12-19\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2808\/19.4T8PTM.E1.S1 \u2013 2023-12-19","og_description":"Relator: MARIA CLARA SOTTOMAYOR. I ? O aditamento de um ponto ? factualidade provada, que n?o teve reflexo na decis?o final, com o objetivo de explicitar o conte?do de um documento junto aos autos que n?o foi impugnado, n?o ? apto a descaraterizar a dupla conformidade. II ? N?o basta para afastar o obst?culo da dupla conforme impeditivo do recurso de revista, nos termos do n.? 3 do artigo 671.? do CPC, que a senten?a e o ac?rd?o apresentem fundamenta??o diferente; exige-se que essa diferen?a seja essencial. III ? A diferen?a de fundamenta??o entre o tribunal de 1.? inst?ncia e o ac?rd?o recorrido n?o ? essencial, se o ac?rd?o recorrido decidiu negar a indemniza??o ? autora, por ter entendido que da mat?ria de facto decorre que houve justa causa de exonera??o da administradora de condom?nio, nos termos do n.? 3 do artigo 1435.? do C?digo Civil, e a senten?a, prescindindo de qualquer considera??o de direito acerca da no??o de justa causa (mas tendo fixado os factos integradores do conceito de justa causa), entendeu, com base no n.? 1 do artigo 1435.? do C?digo Civil, que a exonera??o exercida atrav?s de delibera??o da assembleia geral de cond?minos, desde que n?o impugnada, n?o faz nascer na esfera jur?dica da autora o direito de indemniza??o. IV ? Para apreender o sentido da fundamenta??o, ? necess?rio proceder a uma interpreta??o dos fundamentos da senten?a e do ac?rd?o recorrido.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2808-19-4t8ptm-e1-s1-2023-12-19\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"1 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2808-19-4t8ptm-e1-s1-2023-12-19\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2808-19-4t8ptm-e1-s1-2023-12-19\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2808\/19.4T8PTM.E1.S1 \u2013 2023-12-19 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-19T12:48:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2808-19-4t8ptm-e1-s1-2023-12-19\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2808-19-4t8ptm-e1-s1-2023-12-19\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-2808-19-4t8ptm-e1-s1-2023-12-19\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 2808\/19.4T8PTM.E1.S1 \u2013 2023-12-19"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/606504","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=606504"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=606504"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=606504"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=606504"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=606504"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=606504"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=606504"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=606504"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}