{"id":608297,"date":"2026-04-19T17:17:59","date_gmt":"2026-04-19T15:17:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-687-23-6yrlsb-s1-2023-11-23\/"},"modified":"2026-04-19T17:17:59","modified_gmt":"2026-04-19T15:17:59","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-687-23-6yrlsb-s1-2023-11-23","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-687-23-6yrlsb-s1-2023-11-23\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 687\/23.6YRLSB.S1 \u2013 2023-11-23"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: JORGE GON?ALVES. I – A Conven??o de Extradi??o entre Estados Membros da Comunidade de Pa?ses de L?ngua Portuguesa (Conven??o da CPLP) n?o permite ao Estado requerido controlar a proporcionalidade do impulso extradicional formulado pelo Estado requerente, ou avaliar a sufici?ncia dos ind?cios colhidos na investiga??o pendente no Brasil sobre os factos que fundaram a emiss?o do mandado de pris?o, comuns ao pedido de extradi??o. II ? A obriga??o de extraditar que resulta do art. 1.? para os Estados contratantes da Conven??o da CPLP apenas pode ser recusada quando ocorrem os motivos de inadmissibilidade previstos no seu artigo 3.? ou os de recusa facultativa previstos no artigo 4.?, que constituem um regime pr?prio e taxativo em mat?ria de causas de recusa de extradi??o no ?mbito da referida Conven??o, inexistindo lacuna a preencher nesse dom?nio com recurso ?s normas da Lei n.? 144\/99, de 31.08.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: JORGE GON?ALVES. I – A Conven??o de Extradi??o entre Estados Membros da Comunidade de Pa?ses de L?ngua Portuguesa (Conven??o da CPLP) n?o permite ao Estado requerido controlar a proporcionalidade do impulso extradicional formulado pelo Estado requerente, ou avaliar a sufici?ncia dos ind?cios colhidos na investiga??o pendente no Brasil sobre os factos que fundaram a emiss?o do mandado de pris?o, comuns ao pedido de extradi??o. II ? A obriga??o de extraditar que resulta do art. 1.? para os Estados contratantes da Conven??o da CPLP apenas pode ser recusada quando ocorrem os motivos de inadmissibilidade previstos no seu artigo 3.? ou os de recusa facultativa previstos no artigo 4.?, que constituem um regime pr?prio e taxativo em mat?ria de causas de recusa de extradi??o no ?mbito da referida Conven??o, inexistindo lacuna a preencher nesse dom?nio com recurso ?s normas da Lei n.? 144\/99, de 31.08.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[7955],"kji_year":[24566],"kji_subject":[7632],"kji_keyword":[7772,7771,7773,7636,8516],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-608297","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-5-seco","kji_year-24566","kji_subject-penal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_keyword-yrlsb","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 687\/23.6YRLSB.S1 \u2013 2023-11-23 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-687-23-6yrlsb-s1-2023-11-23\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 687\/23.6YRLSB.S1 \u2013 2023-11-23\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: JORGE GON?ALVES. I - A Conven??o de Extradi??o entre Estados Membros da Comunidade de Pa?ses de L?ngua Portuguesa (Conven??o da CPLP) n?o permite ao Estado requerido controlar a proporcionalidade do impulso extradicional formulado pelo Estado requerente, ou avaliar a sufici?ncia dos ind?cios colhidos na investiga??o pendente no Brasil sobre os factos que fundaram a emiss?o do mandado de pris?o, comuns ao pedido de extradi??o. II ? A obriga??o de extraditar que resulta do art. 1.? para os Estados contratantes da Conven??o da CPLP apenas pode ser recusada quando ocorrem os motivos de inadmissibilidade previstos no seu artigo 3.? ou os de recusa facultativa previstos no artigo 4.?, que constituem um regime pr?prio e taxativo em mat?ria de causas de recusa de extradi??o no ?mbito da referida Conven??o, inexistindo lacuna a preencher nesse dom?nio com recurso ?s normas da Lei n.? 144\/99, de 31.08.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-687-23-6yrlsb-s1-2023-11-23\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-687-23-6yrlsb-s1-2023-11-23\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-687-23-6yrlsb-s1-2023-11-23\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 687\\\/23.6YRLSB.S1 \u2013 2023-11-23 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-19T15:17:59+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-687-23-6yrlsb-s1-2023-11-23\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-687-23-6yrlsb-s1-2023-11-23\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-687-23-6yrlsb-s1-2023-11-23\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 687\\\/23.6YRLSB.S1 \u2013 2023-11-23\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 687\/23.6YRLSB.S1 \u2013 2023-11-23 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-687-23-6yrlsb-s1-2023-11-23\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 687\/23.6YRLSB.S1 \u2013 2023-11-23","og_description":"Relator: JORGE GON?ALVES. I - A Conven??o de Extradi??o entre Estados Membros da Comunidade de Pa?ses de L?ngua Portuguesa (Conven??o da CPLP) n?o permite ao Estado requerido controlar a proporcionalidade do impulso extradicional formulado pelo Estado requerente, ou avaliar a sufici?ncia dos ind?cios colhidos na investiga??o pendente no Brasil sobre os factos que fundaram a emiss?o do mandado de pris?o, comuns ao pedido de extradi??o. II ? A obriga??o de extraditar que resulta do art. 1.? para os Estados contratantes da Conven??o da CPLP apenas pode ser recusada quando ocorrem os motivos de inadmissibilidade previstos no seu artigo 3.? ou os de recusa facultativa previstos no artigo 4.?, que constituem um regime pr?prio e taxativo em mat?ria de causas de recusa de extradi??o no ?mbito da referida Conven??o, inexistindo lacuna a preencher nesse dom?nio com recurso ?s normas da Lei n.? 144\/99, de 31.08.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-687-23-6yrlsb-s1-2023-11-23\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"1 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-687-23-6yrlsb-s1-2023-11-23\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-687-23-6yrlsb-s1-2023-11-23\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 687\/23.6YRLSB.S1 \u2013 2023-11-23 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-19T15:17:59+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-687-23-6yrlsb-s1-2023-11-23\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-687-23-6yrlsb-s1-2023-11-23\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-687-23-6yrlsb-s1-2023-11-23\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 687\/23.6YRLSB.S1 \u2013 2023-11-23"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/608297","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=608297"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=608297"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=608297"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=608297"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=608297"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=608297"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=608297"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=608297"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}