{"id":616021,"date":"2026-04-20T04:04:12","date_gmt":"2026-04-20T02:04:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-237-18-6jafar-a-s1-2023-07-11\/"},"modified":"2026-04-20T04:04:12","modified_gmt":"2026-04-20T02:04:12","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-237-18-6jafar-a-s1-2023-07-11","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-237-18-6jafar-a-s1-2023-07-11\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 237\/18.6JAFAR-A.S1 \u2013 2023-07-11"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: ANA BARATA BRITO. I. N?o constitui fundamento de revis?o a alega??o pelo recorrente arguido de que teria sido ?mal aconselhado? a confessar em julgamento os factos que levaram ? sua condena??o. II. Se nos termos do art. 449.? n.? 1 al. d) do CPP os factos e\/ou as provas t?m de ser novos, no sentido de desconhecidos do tribunal e do arguido ao tempo do julgamento, tal novidade n?o ocorre quanto a factos pessoais, como seja a declara??o confess?ria prestada em julgamento, e o recurso extraordin?rio de revis?o tamb?m n?o serve para corrigir defici?ncias da defesa ou estrat?gias inconsequentes. III. Falece igualmente o fundamento previsto no art. 449.? n.? 1 al. e) do CPP – que pressup?e a converg?ncia de tr?s requisitos cumulativos: estar-se em presen?a de uma proibi??o de prova; a prova proibida ter servido de fundamento ? condena??o; a natureza e utiliza??o da prova proibida ter sido descoberta ap?s o julgamento ? se n?o ? trazida ? revis?o nenhuma circunst?ncia que possa configurar proibi??o de prova.?<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: ANA BARATA BRITO. I. N?o constitui fundamento de revis?o a alega??o pelo recorrente arguido de que teria sido ?mal aconselhado? a confessar em julgamento os factos que levaram ? sua condena??o. II. Se nos termos do art. 449.? n.? 1 al. d) do CPP os factos e\/ou as provas t?m de ser novos, no sentido de desconhecidos do tribunal e do arguido ao tempo do julgamento, tal novidade n?o ocorre quanto a factos pessoais, como seja a declara??o confess?ria prestada em julgamento, e o recurso extraordin?rio de revis?o tamb?m n?o serve para corrigir defici?ncias da defesa ou estrat?gias inconsequentes. III. Falece igualmente o fundamento previsto no art. 449.? n.? 1 al. e) do CPP – que pressup?e a converg?ncia de tr?s requisitos cumulativos: estar-se em presen?a de uma proibi??o de prova; a prova proibida ter servido de fundamento ? condena??o; a natureza e utiliza??o da prova proibida ter sido descoberta ap?s o julgamento ? se n?o ? trazida ? revis?o nenhuma circunst?ncia que possa configurar proibi??o de prova.?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8484],"kji_year":[24566],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-616021","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-3-seco","kji_year-24566","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 237\/18.6JAFAR-A.S1 \u2013 2023-07-11 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-237-18-6jafar-a-s1-2023-07-11\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 237\/18.6JAFAR-A.S1 \u2013 2023-07-11\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: ANA BARATA BRITO. I. N?o constitui fundamento de revis?o a alega??o pelo recorrente arguido de que teria sido ?mal aconselhado? a confessar em julgamento os factos que levaram ? sua condena??o. II. Se nos termos do art. 449.? n.? 1 al. d) do CPP os factos e\/ou as provas t?m de ser novos, no sentido de desconhecidos do tribunal e do arguido ao tempo do julgamento, tal novidade n?o ocorre quanto a factos pessoais, como seja a declara??o confess?ria prestada em julgamento, e o recurso extraordin?rio de revis?o tamb?m n?o serve para corrigir defici?ncias da defesa ou estrat?gias inconsequentes. III. Falece igualmente o fundamento previsto no art. 449.? n.? 1 al. e) do CPP - que pressup?e a converg?ncia de tr?s requisitos cumulativos: estar-se em presen?a de uma proibi??o de prova; a prova proibida ter servido de fundamento ? condena??o; a natureza e utiliza??o da prova proibida ter sido descoberta ap?s o julgamento ? se n?o ? trazida ? revis?o nenhuma circunst?ncia que possa configurar proibi??o de prova.?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-237-18-6jafar-a-s1-2023-07-11\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-237-18-6jafar-a-s1-2023-07-11\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-237-18-6jafar-a-s1-2023-07-11\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 237\\\/18.6JAFAR-A.S1 \u2013 2023-07-11 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-20T02:04:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-237-18-6jafar-a-s1-2023-07-11\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-237-18-6jafar-a-s1-2023-07-11\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-237-18-6jafar-a-s1-2023-07-11\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 237\\\/18.6JAFAR-A.S1 \u2013 2023-07-11\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 237\/18.6JAFAR-A.S1 \u2013 2023-07-11 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-237-18-6jafar-a-s1-2023-07-11\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 237\/18.6JAFAR-A.S1 \u2013 2023-07-11","og_description":"Relator: ANA BARATA BRITO. I. N?o constitui fundamento de revis?o a alega??o pelo recorrente arguido de que teria sido ?mal aconselhado? a confessar em julgamento os factos que levaram ? sua condena??o. II. Se nos termos do art. 449.? n.? 1 al. d) do CPP os factos e\/ou as provas t?m de ser novos, no sentido de desconhecidos do tribunal e do arguido ao tempo do julgamento, tal novidade n?o ocorre quanto a factos pessoais, como seja a declara??o confess?ria prestada em julgamento, e o recurso extraordin?rio de revis?o tamb?m n?o serve para corrigir defici?ncias da defesa ou estrat?gias inconsequentes. III. Falece igualmente o fundamento previsto no art. 449.? n.? 1 al. e) do CPP - que pressup?e a converg?ncia de tr?s requisitos cumulativos: estar-se em presen?a de uma proibi??o de prova; a prova proibida ter servido de fundamento ? condena??o; a natureza e utiliza??o da prova proibida ter sido descoberta ap?s o julgamento ? se n?o ? trazida ? revis?o nenhuma circunst?ncia que possa configurar proibi??o de prova.?","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-237-18-6jafar-a-s1-2023-07-11\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"1 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-237-18-6jafar-a-s1-2023-07-11\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-237-18-6jafar-a-s1-2023-07-11\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 237\/18.6JAFAR-A.S1 \u2013 2023-07-11 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-20T02:04:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-237-18-6jafar-a-s1-2023-07-11\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-237-18-6jafar-a-s1-2023-07-11\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-237-18-6jafar-a-s1-2023-07-11\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 237\/18.6JAFAR-A.S1 \u2013 2023-07-11"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/616021","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=616021"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=616021"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=616021"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=616021"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=616021"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=616021"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=616021"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=616021"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}