{"id":632680,"date":"2026-04-21T07:16:57","date_gmt":"2026-04-21T05:16:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6330-18-8jflsb-s1-2023-06-22\/"},"modified":"2026-04-21T07:16:57","modified_gmt":"2026-04-21T05:16:57","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6330-18-8jflsb-s1-2023-06-22","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6330-18-8jflsb-s1-2023-06-22\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 6330\/18.8JFLSB.S1 \u2013 2023-06-22"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: AGOSTINHO TORRES. I- reclama??o de Ac?rd?o (do STJ) ? improcedente quando surge como uma insist?ncia do recorrente na discord?ncia do racioc?nio a quo seguido e assumido quanto ? considera??o da prova e da qualifica??o jur?dica do crime e ? alegada n?o verifica??o do elemento subjectivo do crime (in casu de associa??o criminosa), deslocando essa discord?ncia para? a caracteriza??o de uma nulidade por omiss?o, em suposto ganho de tempo para se obter decis?o definitiva. II- Inexiste omiss?o de pron?ncia quando ? claro que do texto do ac?rd?o reclamado resulta que nas quest?es identificadas se reflectiu sobre a quest?o concreta alegadamente omitida e sobre ela o tribunal se pronunciou? clara e consistentemente, ?a identificou, justificou e sobre ela emitiu an?lise e pron?ncia. Caracterizado o crime na sua? formula??o dogm?tico-jur?dica, sublinhado o papel e ac??o do arguido no crime de organiza??o criminosa destacando n?o se tratar de uma simples co-autoria na pr?tica de crimes fiscais e acentuada ainda, no plano adequado e provado, a consci?ncia e motiva??o do arguido na execu??o dessa finalidade por aquela via organizativa, ? manifesta a falta de fundamento para a referida reclama??o.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: AGOSTINHO TORRES. I- reclama??o de Ac?rd?o (do STJ) ? improcedente quando surge como uma insist?ncia do recorrente na discord?ncia do racioc?nio a quo seguido e assumido quanto ? considera??o da prova e da qualifica??o jur?dica do crime e ? alegada n?o verifica??o do elemento subjectivo do crime (in casu de associa??o criminosa), deslocando essa discord?ncia para? a caracteriza??o de uma nulidade por omiss?o, em suposto ganho de tempo para se obter decis?o definitiva. II- Inexiste omiss?o de pron?ncia quando ? claro que do texto do ac?rd?o reclamado resulta que nas quest?es identificadas se reflectiu sobre a quest?o concreta alegadamente omitida e sobre ela o tribunal se pronunciou? clara e consistentemente, ?a identificou, justificou e sobre ela emitiu an?lise e pron?ncia. Caracterizado o crime na sua? formula??o dogm?tico-jur?dica, sublinhado o papel e ac??o do arguido no crime de organiza??o criminosa destacando n?o se tratar de uma simples co-autoria na pr?tica de crimes fiscais e acentuada ainda, no plano adequado e provado, a consci?ncia e motiva??o do arguido na execu??o dessa finalidade por aquela via organizativa, ? manifesta a falta de fundamento para a referida reclama??o.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[7955],"kji_year":[24566],"kji_subject":[7632],"kji_keyword":[7772,24184,7774,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-632680","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-5-seco","kji_year-24566","kji_subject-penal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-jflsb","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 6330\/18.8JFLSB.S1 \u2013 2023-06-22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6330-18-8jflsb-s1-2023-06-22\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 6330\/18.8JFLSB.S1 \u2013 2023-06-22\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: AGOSTINHO TORRES. I- reclama??o de Ac?rd?o (do STJ) ? improcedente quando surge como uma insist?ncia do recorrente na discord?ncia do racioc?nio a quo seguido e assumido quanto ? considera??o da prova e da qualifica??o jur?dica do crime e ? alegada n?o verifica??o do elemento subjectivo do crime (in casu de associa??o criminosa), deslocando essa discord?ncia para? a caracteriza??o de uma nulidade por omiss?o, em suposto ganho de tempo para se obter decis?o definitiva. II- Inexiste omiss?o de pron?ncia quando ? claro que do texto do ac?rd?o reclamado resulta que nas quest?es identificadas se reflectiu sobre a quest?o concreta alegadamente omitida e sobre ela o tribunal se pronunciou? clara e consistentemente, ?a identificou, justificou e sobre ela emitiu an?lise e pron?ncia. Caracterizado o crime na sua? formula??o dogm?tico-jur?dica, sublinhado o papel e ac??o do arguido no crime de organiza??o criminosa destacando n?o se tratar de uma simples co-autoria na pr?tica de crimes fiscais e acentuada ainda, no plano adequado e provado, a consci?ncia e motiva??o do arguido na execu??o dessa finalidade por aquela via organizativa, ? manifesta a falta de fundamento para a referida reclama??o.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6330-18-8jflsb-s1-2023-06-22\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6330-18-8jflsb-s1-2023-06-22\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6330-18-8jflsb-s1-2023-06-22\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 6330\\\/18.8JFLSB.S1 \u2013 2023-06-22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-21T05:16:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6330-18-8jflsb-s1-2023-06-22\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6330-18-8jflsb-s1-2023-06-22\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6330-18-8jflsb-s1-2023-06-22\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 6330\\\/18.8JFLSB.S1 \u2013 2023-06-22\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 6330\/18.8JFLSB.S1 \u2013 2023-06-22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6330-18-8jflsb-s1-2023-06-22\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 6330\/18.8JFLSB.S1 \u2013 2023-06-22","og_description":"Relator: AGOSTINHO TORRES. I- reclama??o de Ac?rd?o (do STJ) ? improcedente quando surge como uma insist?ncia do recorrente na discord?ncia do racioc?nio a quo seguido e assumido quanto ? considera??o da prova e da qualifica??o jur?dica do crime e ? alegada n?o verifica??o do elemento subjectivo do crime (in casu de associa??o criminosa), deslocando essa discord?ncia para? a caracteriza??o de uma nulidade por omiss?o, em suposto ganho de tempo para se obter decis?o definitiva. II- Inexiste omiss?o de pron?ncia quando ? claro que do texto do ac?rd?o reclamado resulta que nas quest?es identificadas se reflectiu sobre a quest?o concreta alegadamente omitida e sobre ela o tribunal se pronunciou? clara e consistentemente, ?a identificou, justificou e sobre ela emitiu an?lise e pron?ncia. Caracterizado o crime na sua? formula??o dogm?tico-jur?dica, sublinhado o papel e ac??o do arguido no crime de organiza??o criminosa destacando n?o se tratar de uma simples co-autoria na pr?tica de crimes fiscais e acentuada ainda, no plano adequado e provado, a consci?ncia e motiva??o do arguido na execu??o dessa finalidade por aquela via organizativa, ? manifesta a falta de fundamento para a referida reclama??o.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6330-18-8jflsb-s1-2023-06-22\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"1 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6330-18-8jflsb-s1-2023-06-22\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6330-18-8jflsb-s1-2023-06-22\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 6330\/18.8JFLSB.S1 \u2013 2023-06-22 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-21T05:16:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6330-18-8jflsb-s1-2023-06-22\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6330-18-8jflsb-s1-2023-06-22\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-6330-18-8jflsb-s1-2023-06-22\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 6330\/18.8JFLSB.S1 \u2013 2023-06-22"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/632680","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=632680"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=632680"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=632680"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=632680"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=632680"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=632680"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=632680"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=632680"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}