{"id":637184,"date":"2026-04-21T16:03:08","date_gmt":"2026-04-21T14:03:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-333-14-9telsb-l1-s1-2023-05-17\/"},"modified":"2026-04-21T16:03:08","modified_gmt":"2026-04-21T14:03:08","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-333-14-9telsb-l1-s1-2023-05-17","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-333-14-9telsb-l1-s1-2023-05-17\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 333\/14.9TELSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-05-17"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: PEDRO BRANQUINHO DIAS. I. O ac?rd?o do Tribunal da Rela??o que indeferiu nulidades ao arguido ? uma decis?o que n?o conhece do objeto do processo, tratando-se de uma decis?o incidental, sem autonomia, do ac?rd?o proferido pelo mesmo tribunal que confirmou integralmente o ac?rd?o do tribunal coletivo da primeira inst?ncia, que o havia condenado na pena ?nica de 6 anos e 8 meses de pris?o. II. Havendo, assim, dupla conformidade, n?o ? admiss?vel recurso para STJ do ac?rd?o do Tribunal da Rela??o que indeferiu as nulidades do arguido, sob pena de estarmos ilegitimamente a contornar a lei processual sobre a (in) admissibilidade de recursos penais para o STJ. III. Nesta conformidade, ? de rejeitar o recurso interposto pelo arguido, por inadmissibilidade legal, nos termos do arts. 432.? n.? 1 b), a contrario, do C.P.P., com refer?ncia ?s al?neas c) e f) do n.? 1 do art. 400.?, do mesmo diploma legal, ficando, deste modo, prejudicada a aprecia??o das quest?es nele levantadas. IV. N?o obstando a tal, como ? sabido, a circunst?ncia de o recurso em causa ter sido admitido pelo tribunal a quo, pois, de acordo com o estatu?do no art. 414.? n.? 3, do C.P.P., tal decis?o n?o vincula o tribunal superior.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: PEDRO BRANQUINHO DIAS. I. O ac?rd?o do Tribunal da Rela??o que indeferiu nulidades ao arguido ? uma decis?o que n?o conhece do objeto do processo, tratando-se de uma decis?o incidental, sem autonomia, do ac?rd?o proferido pelo mesmo tribunal que confirmou integralmente o ac?rd?o do tribunal coletivo da primeira inst?ncia, que o havia condenado na pena ?nica de 6 anos e 8 meses de pris?o. II. Havendo, assim, dupla conformidade, n?o ? admiss?vel recurso para STJ do ac?rd?o do Tribunal da Rela??o que indeferiu as nulidades do arguido, sob pena de estarmos ilegitimamente a contornar a lei processual sobre a (in) admissibilidade de recursos penais para o STJ. III. Nesta conformidade, ? de rejeitar o recurso interposto pelo arguido, por inadmissibilidade legal, nos termos do arts. 432.? n.? 1 b), a contrario, do C.P.P., com refer?ncia ?s al?neas c) e f) do n.? 1 do art. 400.?, do mesmo diploma legal, ficando, deste modo, prejudicada a aprecia??o das quest?es nele levantadas. IV. N?o obstando a tal, como ? sabido, a circunst?ncia de o recurso em causa ter sido admitido pelo tribunal a quo, pois, de acordo com o estatu?do no art. 414.? n.? 3, do C.P.P., tal decis?o n?o vincula o tribunal superior.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8484],"kji_year":[24566],"kji_subject":[7632],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-637184","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-3-seco","kji_year-24566","kji_subject-penal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 333\/14.9TELSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-05-17 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-333-14-9telsb-l1-s1-2023-05-17\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 333\/14.9TELSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-05-17\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: PEDRO BRANQUINHO DIAS. I. O ac?rd?o do Tribunal da Rela??o que indeferiu nulidades ao arguido ? uma decis?o que n?o conhece do objeto do processo, tratando-se de uma decis?o incidental, sem autonomia, do ac?rd?o proferido pelo mesmo tribunal que confirmou integralmente o ac?rd?o do tribunal coletivo da primeira inst?ncia, que o havia condenado na pena ?nica de 6 anos e 8 meses de pris?o. II. Havendo, assim, dupla conformidade, n?o ? admiss?vel recurso para STJ do ac?rd?o do Tribunal da Rela??o que indeferiu as nulidades do arguido, sob pena de estarmos ilegitimamente a contornar a lei processual sobre a (in) admissibilidade de recursos penais para o STJ. III. Nesta conformidade, ? de rejeitar o recurso interposto pelo arguido, por inadmissibilidade legal, nos termos do arts. 432.? n.? 1 b), a contrario, do C.P.P., com refer?ncia ?s al?neas c) e f) do n.? 1 do art. 400.?, do mesmo diploma legal, ficando, deste modo, prejudicada a aprecia??o das quest?es nele levantadas. IV. N?o obstando a tal, como ? sabido, a circunst?ncia de o recurso em causa ter sido admitido pelo tribunal a quo, pois, de acordo com o estatu?do no art. 414.? n.? 3, do C.P.P., tal decis?o n?o vincula o tribunal superior.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-333-14-9telsb-l1-s1-2023-05-17\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-333-14-9telsb-l1-s1-2023-05-17\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-333-14-9telsb-l1-s1-2023-05-17\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 333\\\/14.9TELSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-05-17 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-21T14:03:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-333-14-9telsb-l1-s1-2023-05-17\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-333-14-9telsb-l1-s1-2023-05-17\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-333-14-9telsb-l1-s1-2023-05-17\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 333\\\/14.9TELSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-05-17\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 333\/14.9TELSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-05-17 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-333-14-9telsb-l1-s1-2023-05-17\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 333\/14.9TELSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-05-17","og_description":"Relator: PEDRO BRANQUINHO DIAS. I. O ac?rd?o do Tribunal da Rela??o que indeferiu nulidades ao arguido ? uma decis?o que n?o conhece do objeto do processo, tratando-se de uma decis?o incidental, sem autonomia, do ac?rd?o proferido pelo mesmo tribunal que confirmou integralmente o ac?rd?o do tribunal coletivo da primeira inst?ncia, que o havia condenado na pena ?nica de 6 anos e 8 meses de pris?o. II. Havendo, assim, dupla conformidade, n?o ? admiss?vel recurso para STJ do ac?rd?o do Tribunal da Rela??o que indeferiu as nulidades do arguido, sob pena de estarmos ilegitimamente a contornar a lei processual sobre a (in) admissibilidade de recursos penais para o STJ. III. Nesta conformidade, ? de rejeitar o recurso interposto pelo arguido, por inadmissibilidade legal, nos termos do arts. 432.? n.? 1 b), a contrario, do C.P.P., com refer?ncia ?s al?neas c) e f) do n.? 1 do art. 400.?, do mesmo diploma legal, ficando, deste modo, prejudicada a aprecia??o das quest?es nele levantadas. IV. N?o obstando a tal, como ? sabido, a circunst?ncia de o recurso em causa ter sido admitido pelo tribunal a quo, pois, de acordo com o estatu?do no art. 414.? n.? 3, do C.P.P., tal decis?o n?o vincula o tribunal superior.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-333-14-9telsb-l1-s1-2023-05-17\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"1 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-333-14-9telsb-l1-s1-2023-05-17\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-333-14-9telsb-l1-s1-2023-05-17\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 333\/14.9TELSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-05-17 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-21T14:03:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-333-14-9telsb-l1-s1-2023-05-17\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-333-14-9telsb-l1-s1-2023-05-17\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-333-14-9telsb-l1-s1-2023-05-17\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 333\/14.9TELSB.L1.S1 \u2013 2023-05-17"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/637184","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=637184"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=637184"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=637184"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=637184"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=637184"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=637184"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=637184"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=637184"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}