{"id":637188,"date":"2026-04-21T16:03:19","date_gmt":"2026-04-21T14:03:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-738-20-6t9tvd-l1-a-s1-aa-2023-05-17\/"},"modified":"2026-04-21T16:03:19","modified_gmt":"2026-04-21T14:03:19","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-738-20-6t9tvd-l1-a-s1-aa-2023-05-17","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-738-20-6t9tvd-l1-a-s1-aa-2023-05-17\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 738\/20.6T9TVD.L1-A.S1-AA \u2013 2023-05-17"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: ANA BARATA BRITO. I -???Tendo sido recusada a recusa, por a situa??o apresentada n?o se integrar nas previstas no art. 40.? do CPP (impedimento por participa??o em processo) e tamb?m n?o ser suscept?vel de? configurar a previs?o do n.? 1 do art. 43.? (por o problema colocado n?o respeitar ? imparcialidade do juiz e do tribunal), reiterando o arguido, com argumentos semelhantes, o pedido anterior, pedido que j? se encontra decidido por ac?rd?o do Supremo, resulta evidente que, com o novo requerimento, pretende apenas obstar ao tr?nsito em julgado da decis?o que recusou a recusa. II -??Tratando-se, assim, de um requerimento que consubstancia um incidente manifestamente infundado que visa apenas obstar ao tr?nsito em julgado da decis?o, ? de ordenar o seu processamento em separado ao abrigo do art. 670.?, n.? 1, do CPC, determinando-se a imediata extra??o de traslado e certificando-se o tr?nsito em julgado do ac?rd?o do Supremo.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: ANA BARATA BRITO. I -???Tendo sido recusada a recusa, por a situa??o apresentada n?o se integrar nas previstas no art. 40.? do CPP (impedimento por participa??o em processo) e tamb?m n?o ser suscept?vel de? configurar a previs?o do n.? 1 do art. 43.? (por o problema colocado n?o respeitar ? imparcialidade do juiz e do tribunal), reiterando o arguido, com argumentos semelhantes, o pedido anterior, pedido que j? se encontra decidido por ac?rd?o do Supremo, resulta evidente que, com o novo requerimento, pretende apenas obstar ao tr?nsito em julgado da decis?o que recusou a recusa. II -??Tratando-se, assim, de um requerimento que consubstancia um incidente manifestamente infundado que visa apenas obstar ao tr?nsito em julgado da decis?o, ? de ordenar o seu processamento em separado ao abrigo do art. 670.?, n.? 1, do CPC, determinando-se a imediata extra??o de traslado e certificando-se o tr?nsito em julgado do ac?rd?o do Supremo.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8484],"kji_year":[24566],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-637188","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-3-seco","kji_year-24566","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 738\/20.6T9TVD.L1-A.S1-AA \u2013 2023-05-17 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-738-20-6t9tvd-l1-a-s1-aa-2023-05-17\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 738\/20.6T9TVD.L1-A.S1-AA \u2013 2023-05-17\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: ANA BARATA BRITO. I -???Tendo sido recusada a recusa, por a situa??o apresentada n?o se integrar nas previstas no art. 40.? do CPP (impedimento por participa??o em processo) e tamb?m n?o ser suscept?vel de? configurar a previs?o do n.? 1 do art. 43.? (por o problema colocado n?o respeitar ? imparcialidade do juiz e do tribunal), reiterando o arguido, com argumentos semelhantes, o pedido anterior, pedido que j? se encontra decidido por ac?rd?o do Supremo, resulta evidente que, com o novo requerimento, pretende apenas obstar ao tr?nsito em julgado da decis?o que recusou a recusa. II -??Tratando-se, assim, de um requerimento que consubstancia um incidente manifestamente infundado que visa apenas obstar ao tr?nsito em julgado da decis?o, ? de ordenar o seu processamento em separado ao abrigo do art. 670.?, n.? 1, do CPC, determinando-se a imediata extra??o de traslado e certificando-se o tr?nsito em julgado do ac?rd?o do Supremo.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-738-20-6t9tvd-l1-a-s1-aa-2023-05-17\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-738-20-6t9tvd-l1-a-s1-aa-2023-05-17\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-738-20-6t9tvd-l1-a-s1-aa-2023-05-17\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 738\\\/20.6T9TVD.L1-A.S1-AA \u2013 2023-05-17 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-21T14:03:19+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-738-20-6t9tvd-l1-a-s1-aa-2023-05-17\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-738-20-6t9tvd-l1-a-s1-aa-2023-05-17\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-738-20-6t9tvd-l1-a-s1-aa-2023-05-17\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 738\\\/20.6T9TVD.L1-A.S1-AA \u2013 2023-05-17\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 738\/20.6T9TVD.L1-A.S1-AA \u2013 2023-05-17 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-738-20-6t9tvd-l1-a-s1-aa-2023-05-17\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 738\/20.6T9TVD.L1-A.S1-AA \u2013 2023-05-17","og_description":"Relator: ANA BARATA BRITO. I -???Tendo sido recusada a recusa, por a situa??o apresentada n?o se integrar nas previstas no art. 40.? do CPP (impedimento por participa??o em processo) e tamb?m n?o ser suscept?vel de? configurar a previs?o do n.? 1 do art. 43.? (por o problema colocado n?o respeitar ? imparcialidade do juiz e do tribunal), reiterando o arguido, com argumentos semelhantes, o pedido anterior, pedido que j? se encontra decidido por ac?rd?o do Supremo, resulta evidente que, com o novo requerimento, pretende apenas obstar ao tr?nsito em julgado da decis?o que recusou a recusa. II -??Tratando-se, assim, de um requerimento que consubstancia um incidente manifestamente infundado que visa apenas obstar ao tr?nsito em julgado da decis?o, ? de ordenar o seu processamento em separado ao abrigo do art. 670.?, n.? 1, do CPC, determinando-se a imediata extra??o de traslado e certificando-se o tr?nsito em julgado do ac?rd?o do Supremo.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-738-20-6t9tvd-l1-a-s1-aa-2023-05-17\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"1 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-738-20-6t9tvd-l1-a-s1-aa-2023-05-17\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-738-20-6t9tvd-l1-a-s1-aa-2023-05-17\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 738\/20.6T9TVD.L1-A.S1-AA \u2013 2023-05-17 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-21T14:03:19+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-738-20-6t9tvd-l1-a-s1-aa-2023-05-17\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-738-20-6t9tvd-l1-a-s1-aa-2023-05-17\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-738-20-6t9tvd-l1-a-s1-aa-2023-05-17\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 738\/20.6T9TVD.L1-A.S1-AA \u2013 2023-05-17"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/637188","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=637188"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=637188"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=637188"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=637188"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=637188"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=637188"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=637188"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=637188"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}