{"id":643067,"date":"2026-04-22T02:44:58","date_gmt":"2026-04-22T00:44:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-645-21-5t8tmr-e1-s2-2023-03-08\/"},"modified":"2026-04-22T02:44:58","modified_gmt":"2026-04-22T00:44:58","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-645-21-5t8tmr-e1-s2-2023-03-08","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-645-21-5t8tmr-e1-s2-2023-03-08\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 645\/21.5T8TMR.E1.S2 \u2013 2023-03-08"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: RAMALHO PINTO. I- O recorrente que invoca, como fundamento de uma revista excepcional, as al?neas a) e b) do n? 1 do artigo 672? do CPC tem o ?nus de indicar ?as raz?es pelas quais a aprecia??o da quest?o ? claramente necess?ria para uma melhor aplica??o do direito? e\/ou ?as raz?es pelas quais os interesses s?o de particular relev?ncia social?, sob pena de rejei??o do recurso; II- N?o cumpre esse ?nus o recorrente que se limita a, de forma vaga e gen?rica, tecer considera??es gen?ricas sobre a figura do abuso de direito e sobre a presun??o prevista no art? 394?, n? 5, do CT; III- N?o existe contradi??o de ac?rd?os, quando o ac?rd?o recorrido e o ac?rd?o fundamento qualificam ambos tal presun??o como juris et de jure.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jstj.nsf\/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa814\/a74711864735e2e380258972004c6092?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: RAMALHO PINTO. I- O recorrente que invoca, como fundamento de uma revista excepcional, as al?neas a) e b) do n? 1 do artigo 672? do CPC tem o ?nus de indicar ?as raz?es pelas quais a aprecia??o da quest?o ? claramente necess?ria para uma melhor aplica??o do direito? e\/ou ?as raz?es pelas quais os interesses s?o de particular relev?ncia social?, sob pena de rejei??o do recurso; II- N?o cumpre esse ?nus o recorrente que se limita a, de forma vaga e gen?rica, tecer considera??es gen?ricas sobre a figura do abuso de direito e sobre a presun??o prevista no art? 394?, n? 5, do CT; III- N?o existe contradi??o de ac?rd?os, quando o ac?rd?o recorrido e o ac?rd?o fundamento qualificam ambos tal presun??o como juris et de jure.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[7764],"kji_year":[24566],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-643067","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-4-seco","kji_year-24566","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 645\/21.5T8TMR.E1.S2 \u2013 2023-03-08 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-645-21-5t8tmr-e1-s2-2023-03-08\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 645\/21.5T8TMR.E1.S2 \u2013 2023-03-08\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: RAMALHO PINTO. I- O recorrente que invoca, como fundamento de uma revista excepcional, as al?neas a) e b) do n? 1 do artigo 672? do CPC tem o ?nus de indicar ?as raz?es pelas quais a aprecia??o da quest?o ? claramente necess?ria para uma melhor aplica??o do direito? e\/ou ?as raz?es pelas quais os interesses s?o de particular relev?ncia social?, sob pena de rejei??o do recurso; II- N?o cumpre esse ?nus o recorrente que se limita a, de forma vaga e gen?rica, tecer considera??es gen?ricas sobre a figura do abuso de direito e sobre a presun??o prevista no art? 394?, n? 5, do CT; III- N?o existe contradi??o de ac?rd?os, quando o ac?rd?o recorrido e o ac?rd?o fundamento qualificam ambos tal presun??o como juris et de jure.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-645-21-5t8tmr-e1-s2-2023-03-08\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-645-21-5t8tmr-e1-s2-2023-03-08\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-645-21-5t8tmr-e1-s2-2023-03-08\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 645\\\/21.5T8TMR.E1.S2 \u2013 2023-03-08 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-22T00:44:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-645-21-5t8tmr-e1-s2-2023-03-08\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-645-21-5t8tmr-e1-s2-2023-03-08\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-645-21-5t8tmr-e1-s2-2023-03-08\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 645\\\/21.5T8TMR.E1.S2 \u2013 2023-03-08\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 645\/21.5T8TMR.E1.S2 \u2013 2023-03-08 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-645-21-5t8tmr-e1-s2-2023-03-08\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 645\/21.5T8TMR.E1.S2 \u2013 2023-03-08","og_description":"Relator: RAMALHO PINTO. I- O recorrente que invoca, como fundamento de uma revista excepcional, as al?neas a) e b) do n? 1 do artigo 672? do CPC tem o ?nus de indicar ?as raz?es pelas quais a aprecia??o da quest?o ? claramente necess?ria para uma melhor aplica??o do direito? e\/ou ?as raz?es pelas quais os interesses s?o de particular relev?ncia social?, sob pena de rejei??o do recurso; II- N?o cumpre esse ?nus o recorrente que se limita a, de forma vaga e gen?rica, tecer considera??es gen?ricas sobre a figura do abuso de direito e sobre a presun??o prevista no art? 394?, n? 5, do CT; III- N?o existe contradi??o de ac?rd?os, quando o ac?rd?o recorrido e o ac?rd?o fundamento qualificam ambos tal presun??o como juris et de jure.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-645-21-5t8tmr-e1-s2-2023-03-08\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"1 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-645-21-5t8tmr-e1-s2-2023-03-08\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-645-21-5t8tmr-e1-s2-2023-03-08\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 645\/21.5T8TMR.E1.S2 \u2013 2023-03-08 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-22T00:44:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-645-21-5t8tmr-e1-s2-2023-03-08\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-645-21-5t8tmr-e1-s2-2023-03-08\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-645-21-5t8tmr-e1-s2-2023-03-08\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 645\/21.5T8TMR.E1.S2 \u2013 2023-03-08"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/643067","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=643067"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=643067"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=643067"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=643067"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=643067"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=643067"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=643067"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=643067"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}