{"id":648432,"date":"2026-04-22T14:01:32","date_gmt":"2026-04-22T12:01:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/kho202345-purku\/"},"modified":"2026-04-22T14:01:32","modified_gmt":"2026-04-22T12:01:32","slug":"kho202345-purku","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho202345-purku\/","title":{"rendered":"KHO:2023:45 &#8211; Purku"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Asian ovat ratkaisseet oikeusneuvokset Anne E. Niemi, Janne Aer ja Juha Lavapuro. Asian esittelij\u00e4 Kristina Bj\u00f6rkvall.<\/p>\n<p>Seloste on kokonaisuudessaan ruotsinkielisell\u00e4 p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ssivustolla.<\/p>\n<p>\u00c5bo Akademin rehtori oli hakenut maisterintutkielman hyv\u00e4ksymist\u00e4 koskevan p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen purkamista sill\u00e4 perusteella, ett\u00e4 tutkielma oli suurilta osin plagioitu aiemmin hyv\u00e4ksytyst\u00e4 maisterintutkielmasta.<\/p>\n<p>Korkein hallinto-oikeus totesi, ettei opinn\u00e4ytteen arvostelu ole sellainen lainvoimainen hallintop\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s, jonka korkein hallinto-oikeus voi purkaa. Hakemus j\u00e4tettiin t\u00e4m\u00e4n vuoksi tutkimatta.<\/p>\n<h3>Laki oikeudenk\u00e4ynnist\u00e4 hallintoasioissa 6 \u00a7 1 momentti, 81 \u00a7 2 momentti 2 kohta, 117 \u00a7 1 momentti ja 121 \u00a7<\/h3>\n<h3>Yliopistolaki 3 \u00a7 1 momentti, 82 \u00a7 3 momentti ja 84 \u00a7 2 momentti<\/h3>\n<h3>Vrt KHO 2016:68<\/h3>\n<p>Rektor f\u00f6r \u00c5bo akademi hade ans\u00f6kt om \u00e5terbrytande av ett beslut att godk\u00e4nna en magistersavhandling med motiveringen att denna till stora delar var ett plagiat av en tidigare godk\u00e4nd magistersavhandling.<\/p>\n<p>H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen konstaterade att bed\u00f6mningen av ett l\u00e4rdomsprov inte \u00e4r ett s\u00e5dant lagakraftvunnet f\u00f6rvaltningsbeslut som h\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen kan \u00e5terbryta. Ans\u00f6kan avvisades d\u00e4rf\u00f6r utan pr\u00f6vning.<\/p>\n<p>Lagen om r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ng i f\u00f6rvaltnings\u00e4renden 6 \u00a7 1 mom., 81 \u00a7 2 mom. 2 punkten, 117 \u00a7 1 mom. och 121 \u00a7<\/p>\n<p>Universitetslagen 3 \u00a7 1 mom., 82 \u00a7 3 mom. och 84 \u00a7 2 mom.<\/p>\n<h3>Jfr HFD 2016:68<\/h3>\n<h3>Beslut som ans\u00f6kan g\u00e4ller<\/h3>\n<p>\u00c5bo Akademi 6.5.2020 nr 51\/2020<\/p>\n<h3>H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolens avg\u00f6rande<\/h3>\n<p>H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen avvisar ans\u00f6kan utan pr\u00f6vning.<\/p>\n<h3>\u00c4rendets tidigare handl\u00e4ggning<\/h3>\n<p>(1)<\/p>\n<p>har med det beslut som ans\u00f6kan g\u00e4ller godk\u00e4nt en studerandes avhandling pro gradu.<\/p>\n<p>(2)<\/p>\n<p>har 7.5.2020 utf\u00e4rdat betyg \u00f6ver magisterexamen.<\/p>\n<p>(3)<\/p>\n<p>har beordrat en f\u00f6runders\u00f6kning i \u00e4rendet efter att en forskare anm\u00e4lt att avhandlingen till stora delar \u00e4r ett plagiat av hans magistersavhandling, som hade godk\u00e4nts tidigare vid ett annat universitet. P\u00e5 basis av f\u00f6runders\u00f6kningen har \u00e4rendet \u00f6verf\u00f6rts till rektor f\u00f6r bed\u00f6mning av dess f\u00f6rvaltningsr\u00e4ttsliga konsekvenser.<\/p>\n<p>(4)<\/p>\n<p>har 27.3.2023 beslutat att \u00c5bo Akademi ans\u00f6ker om \u00e5terbrytande av dekanens beslut att godk\u00e4nna l\u00e4rdomsprovet.<\/p>\n<h3>Yrkandena och utredningen i h\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen<\/h3>\n<p>(5)<\/p>\n<p>har yrkat att dekanens beslut att godk\u00e4nna l\u00e4rdomsprovet \u00e5terbryts.<\/p>\n<p>(6) Ans\u00f6kan har motiverats bland annat enligt f\u00f6ljande:<\/p>\n<p>(8) Ans\u00f6kan har riktats mot beslutet att godk\u00e4nna avhandlingen f\u00f6r att examensbeslutet inte \u00e4r att betrakta som ett f\u00f6rvaltningsbeslut. Till st\u00f6d f\u00f6r detta har h\u00e4nvisats till \u00e5rsboksbeslutet HFD 2016:68.<\/p>\n<p>(9) \u00c5bo Akademi skulle efter \u00e5terbrytandet \u00e5terta det utf\u00e4rdade examensbetyget d\u00e5 de studieprestationer som kr\u00e4vs f\u00f6r betyg inte \u00e4r slutf\u00f6rda.<\/p>\n<h3>Sk\u00e4len till h\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolens beslut<\/h3>\n<h3>Fr\u00e5gest\u00e4llning<\/h3>\n<h3>Till\u00e4mpade r\u00e4ttsregler och r\u00e4ttslig bed\u00f6mning<\/h3>\n<p>(11) Enligt 117 \u00a7 1 mom. i<\/p>\n<p>kan h\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen p\u00e5 vissa villkor \u00e5terbryta ett lagakraftvunnet f\u00f6rvaltningsbeslut.<\/p>\n<p>(12) I fr\u00e5ga om \u00e5terbrytande av ett lagakraftvunnet beslut till\u00e4mpas enligt lagens 121 \u00a7 i \u00f6vrigt vad som f\u00f6reskrivs om besv\u00e4r. H\u00e4nvisningen inneb\u00e4r bland annat, att ett beslut som inte kan vara f\u00f6rem\u00e5l f\u00f6r besv\u00e4r inte heller kan \u00e5terbrytas.<\/p>\n<p>(14) Universiteten har enligt 3 \u00a7 1 mom. i<\/p>\n<p>sj\u00e4lvstyrelse genom vilken forskningens, konstens och den h\u00f6gsta undervisningens frihet tryggas. Sj\u00e4lvstyrelsen ska innefatta r\u00e4tten att fatta beslut i \u00e4renden som g\u00e4ller den interna f\u00f6rvaltningen.<\/p>\n<p>(15) Om \u00e4ndringss\u00f6kande i bed\u00f6mningen av l\u00e4rdomsprov best\u00e4ms i lagens 82 \u00a7 3 mom. att studeranden inom 14 dagar f\u00e5r beg\u00e4ra ompr\u00f6vning av bed\u00f6mningen av en avhandling som h\u00f6r till de f\u00f6rdjupade studierna hos det organ som universitetet har f\u00f6rordnat p\u00e5 det s\u00e4tt som anges i f\u00f6rvaltningslagen.<\/p>\n<p>(16) Ett beslut som har fattats vid ompr\u00f6vningsf\u00f6rfarande och som g\u00e4ller bland annat bed\u00f6mning av en studieprestation f\u00e5r enligt lagens 84 \u00a7 2 mom. inte \u00f6verklagas genom besv\u00e4r.<\/p>\n<p>(17) Av universitetslagens ovan refererade 82 \u00a7 3 mom. och 84 \u00a7 2 mom. framg\u00e5r att bed\u00f6mningen av en magisteravhandling kan ompr\u00f6vas i ett internt f\u00f6rfarande av universitetets egna organ men inte \u00f6verklagas genom besv\u00e4r.<\/p>\n<p>(18) Besv\u00e4rsf\u00f6rbudet i fr\u00e5ga om bed\u00f6mningen av l\u00e4rdomsprov kan anses \u00f6verensst\u00e4mma med universitetens sj\u00e4lvstyrelse enligt universitetslagens 3 \u00a7 1 mom. Det har i r\u00e4ttslitteraturen motiverats med att bed\u00f6mningen av ett l\u00e4rdomsprov inte ber\u00f6r n\u00e5gons r\u00e4tt eller skyldighet. Ett l\u00e4rdomsprov kan g\u00f6ras om och vid bed\u00f6mningen \u00e4r det inte fr\u00e5ga om lagtill\u00e4mpning. I \u00f6vrigt kan besv\u00e4r anf\u00f6ras \u00f6ver universitetets beslut i f\u00f6rvaltnings\u00e4renden, till exempel beslut om att bevilja examensbetyg (Olli M\u00e4enp\u00e4\u00e4: Yliopistolaki, Talentum 2009).<\/p>\n<p>(19) I \u00e5rsboksbeslutet HFD 2016:68, som \u00c5bo Akademi har h\u00e4nvisat till, var det fr\u00e5ga om \u00e5terbrytande av beslut att utf\u00e4rda examensbevis \u00f6ver avlagd magisterexamen, medan magisteravhandlingen redan tidigare hade underk\u00e4nts vid en ny granskning.<\/p>\n<p>(20) H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen konstaterar att bed\u00f6mningen av en magistersavhandling \u00e4r en vetenskaplig granskning som faller inom ramen f\u00f6r universitetets sj\u00e4lvstyrelse och som inte \u00f6verhuvudtaget kan vara f\u00f6rem\u00e5l f\u00f6r en pr\u00f6vning i f\u00f6rvaltningsr\u00e4ttskipningsordning.<\/p>\n<p>(21) S\u00e5ledes \u00e4r det beslut som ans\u00f6kan riktats mot inte ett s\u00e5dant lagakraftvunnet f\u00f6rvaltningsbeslut som h\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen kan \u00e5terbryta.<\/p>\n<p>(22) Ans\u00f6kan ska d\u00e4rf\u00f6r avvisas utan pr\u00f6vning.<\/p>\n<p>\u00c4rendet har avgjorts av justitier\u00e5den Anne E. Niemi, Janne Aer och Juha Lavapuro. F\u00f6redragande Kristina Bj\u00f6rkvall.<\/p>\n<h3>Dekanen f\u00f6r en fakultet vid \u00c5bo Akademi<\/h3>\n<h3>Dekanen<\/h3>\n<h3>Kansler f\u00f6r \u00c5bo Akademi<\/h3>\n<h3>Rektor f\u00f6r \u00c5bo Akademi<\/h3>\n<h3>\u00c5bo Akademi<\/h3>\n<p>f\u00f6rvaltningsprocesslagen<\/p>\n<p>universitetslagen<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.finlex.fi\/en\/case-law\/supreme-administrative-court\/precedents\/2023\/45\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Finlex open data, CC BY 4.0. Documentation open data verifiee le 2026-04-12 ; les endpoints judgment documentes renvoient 404 pour les types case-law exposes par le frontend, fallback actuel sur les pages publiques data.finlex.fi.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Asian ovat ratkaisseet oikeusneuvokset Anne E. Niemi, Janne Aer ja Juha Lavapuro. Asian esittelij\u00e4 Kristina Bj\u00f6rkvall. Seloste on kokonaisuudessaan ruotsinkielisell\u00e4 p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ssivustolla. \u00c5bo Akademin rehtori oli hakenut maisterintutkielman hyv\u00e4ksymist\u00e4 koskevan p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen purkamista sill\u00e4 perusteella, ett\u00e4 tutkielma oli suurilta osin plagioitu aiemmin hyv\u00e4ksytyst\u00e4 maisterintutkielmasta. Korkein hallinto-oikeus totesi, ettei opinn\u00e4ytteen arvostelu ole sellainen lainvoimainen hallintop\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s, jonka korkein hallinto-oikeus&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7740],"kji_court":[28668],"kji_chamber":[7742],"kji_year":[24566],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[16625,31309,31021,31565,31020],"kji_language":[7746],"class_list":["post-648432","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-finlande","kji_court-cour-supreme-administrative-de-finlande","kji_chamber-precedents","kji_year-24566","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-asian","kji_keyword-niemi","kji_keyword-oikeusneuvokset","kji_keyword-purku","kji_keyword-ratkaisseet","kji_language-multilingue"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>KHO:2023:45 - Purku - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho202345-purku\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"KHO:2023:45 - Purku\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Asian ovat ratkaisseet oikeusneuvokset Anne E. Niemi, Janne Aer ja Juha Lavapuro. Asian esittelij\u00e4 Kristina Bj\u00f6rkvall. Seloste on kokonaisuudessaan ruotsinkielisell\u00e4 p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ssivustolla. \u00c5bo Akademin rehtori oli hakenut maisterintutkielman hyv\u00e4ksymist\u00e4 koskevan p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen purkamista sill\u00e4 perusteella, ett\u00e4 tutkielma oli suurilta osin plagioitu aiemmin hyv\u00e4ksytyst\u00e4 maisterintutkielmasta. Korkein hallinto-oikeus totesi, ettei opinn\u00e4ytteen arvostelu ole sellainen lainvoimainen hallintop\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s, jonka korkein hallinto-oikeus...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho202345-purku\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho202345-purku\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho202345-purku\\\/\",\"name\":\"KHO:2023:45 - Purku - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-22T12:01:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho202345-purku\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho202345-purku\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho202345-purku\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"KHO:2023:45 &#8211; Purku\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"KHO:2023:45 - Purku - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho202345-purku\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"KHO:2023:45 - Purku","og_description":"Asian ovat ratkaisseet oikeusneuvokset Anne E. Niemi, Janne Aer ja Juha Lavapuro. Asian esittelij\u00e4 Kristina Bj\u00f6rkvall. Seloste on kokonaisuudessaan ruotsinkielisell\u00e4 p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ssivustolla. \u00c5bo Akademin rehtori oli hakenut maisterintutkielman hyv\u00e4ksymist\u00e4 koskevan p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen purkamista sill\u00e4 perusteella, ett\u00e4 tutkielma oli suurilta osin plagioitu aiemmin hyv\u00e4ksytyst\u00e4 maisterintutkielmasta. Korkein hallinto-oikeus totesi, ettei opinn\u00e4ytteen arvostelu ole sellainen lainvoimainen hallintop\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s, jonka korkein hallinto-oikeus...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho202345-purku\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"5 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho202345-purku\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho202345-purku\/","name":"KHO:2023:45 - Purku - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-22T12:01:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho202345-purku\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho202345-purku\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho202345-purku\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"KHO:2023:45 &#8211; Purku"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/648432","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=648432"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=648432"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=648432"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=648432"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=648432"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=648432"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=648432"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=648432"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}