{"id":659384,"date":"2026-04-23T13:16:44","date_gmt":"2026-04-23T11:16:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3940-20-7t8stb-a-e1-s1-2022-09-06\/"},"modified":"2026-04-23T13:16:44","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T11:16:44","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3940-20-7t8stb-a-e1-s1-2022-09-06","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3940-20-7t8stb-a-e1-s1-2022-09-06\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3940\/20.7T8STB-A.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-06"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: JOS? RAINHO. I – A LULL n?o fixa o prazo dentro do qual deve ser preenchida a livran?a entregue em branco, t?o pouco o fazendo qualquer outro dispositivo legal. Ser? normalmente o acordo de preenchimento subjacente ? emiss?o da livran?a em branco que define os termos do preenchimento. II – Nada tendo sido estabelecido diversamente em sede de acordo de preenchimento, ? direito potestativo do portador preencher a livran?a com uma qualquer data de vencimento ulterior ao momento do alegado incumprimento da subscritora. III ? Ainda que em ambas as situa??es releve o decurso do tempo, n?o h? que confundir entre prescri??o da obriga??o cartular e exerc?cio abusivo, na modalidade da chamada supressio, do direito ao preenchimento da livran?a em branco. IV ? Mostrando-se que entre a data de vencimento aposta na livran?a e o exerc?cio do cr?dito cartular contra o avalista da subscritora n?o passaram mais de tr?s anos, ? quanto basta para se concluir pela improced?ncia da prescri??o estabelecida no art. 70.? da LULL.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: JOS? RAINHO. I – A LULL n?o fixa o prazo dentro do qual deve ser preenchida a livran?a entregue em branco, t?o pouco o fazendo qualquer outro dispositivo legal. Ser? normalmente o acordo de preenchimento subjacente ? emiss?o da livran?a em branco que define os termos do preenchimento. II – Nada tendo sido estabelecido diversamente em sede de acordo de preenchimento, ? direito potestativo do portador preencher a livran?a com uma qualquer data de vencimento ulterior ao momento do alegado incumprimento da subscritora. III ? Ainda que em ambas as situa??es releve o decurso do tempo, n?o h? que confundir entre prescri??o da obriga??o cartular e exerc?cio abusivo, na modalidade da chamada supressio, do direito ao preenchimento da livran?a em branco. IV ? Mostrando-se que entre a data de vencimento aposta na livran?a e o exerc?cio do cr?dito cartular contra o avalista da subscritora n?o passaram mais de tr?s anos, ? quanto basta para se concluir pela improced?ncia da prescri??o estabelecida no art. 70.? da LULL.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8887],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,7771,19610,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-659384","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-6-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-stb-a","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3940\/20.7T8STB-A.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3940-20-7t8stb-a-e1-s1-2022-09-06\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3940\/20.7T8STB-A.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-06\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: JOS? RAINHO. I - A LULL n?o fixa o prazo dentro do qual deve ser preenchida a livran?a entregue em branco, t?o pouco o fazendo qualquer outro dispositivo legal. Ser? normalmente o acordo de preenchimento subjacente ? emiss?o da livran?a em branco que define os termos do preenchimento. II - Nada tendo sido estabelecido diversamente em sede de acordo de preenchimento, ? direito potestativo do portador preencher a livran?a com uma qualquer data de vencimento ulterior ao momento do alegado incumprimento da subscritora. III ? Ainda que em ambas as situa??es releve o decurso do tempo, n?o h? que confundir entre prescri??o da obriga??o cartular e exerc?cio abusivo, na modalidade da chamada supressio, do direito ao preenchimento da livran?a em branco. IV ? Mostrando-se que entre a data de vencimento aposta na livran?a e o exerc?cio do cr?dito cartular contra o avalista da subscritora n?o passaram mais de tr?s anos, ? quanto basta para se concluir pela improced?ncia da prescri??o estabelecida no art. 70.? da LULL.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3940-20-7t8stb-a-e1-s1-2022-09-06\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3940-20-7t8stb-a-e1-s1-2022-09-06\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3940-20-7t8stb-a-e1-s1-2022-09-06\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3940\\\/20.7T8STB-A.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-23T11:16:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3940-20-7t8stb-a-e1-s1-2022-09-06\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3940-20-7t8stb-a-e1-s1-2022-09-06\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3940-20-7t8stb-a-e1-s1-2022-09-06\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3940\\\/20.7T8STB-A.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-06\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3940\/20.7T8STB-A.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3940-20-7t8stb-a-e1-s1-2022-09-06\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3940\/20.7T8STB-A.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-06","og_description":"Relator: JOS? RAINHO. I - A LULL n?o fixa o prazo dentro do qual deve ser preenchida a livran?a entregue em branco, t?o pouco o fazendo qualquer outro dispositivo legal. Ser? normalmente o acordo de preenchimento subjacente ? emiss?o da livran?a em branco que define os termos do preenchimento. II - Nada tendo sido estabelecido diversamente em sede de acordo de preenchimento, ? direito potestativo do portador preencher a livran?a com uma qualquer data de vencimento ulterior ao momento do alegado incumprimento da subscritora. III ? Ainda que em ambas as situa??es releve o decurso do tempo, n?o h? que confundir entre prescri??o da obriga??o cartular e exerc?cio abusivo, na modalidade da chamada supressio, do direito ao preenchimento da livran?a em branco. IV ? Mostrando-se que entre a data de vencimento aposta na livran?a e o exerc?cio do cr?dito cartular contra o avalista da subscritora n?o passaram mais de tr?s anos, ? quanto basta para se concluir pela improced?ncia da prescri??o estabelecida no art. 70.? da LULL.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3940-20-7t8stb-a-e1-s1-2022-09-06\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"1 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3940-20-7t8stb-a-e1-s1-2022-09-06\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3940-20-7t8stb-a-e1-s1-2022-09-06\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3940\/20.7T8STB-A.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-06 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-23T11:16:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3940-20-7t8stb-a-e1-s1-2022-09-06\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3940-20-7t8stb-a-e1-s1-2022-09-06\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-3940-20-7t8stb-a-e1-s1-2022-09-06\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 3940\/20.7T8STB-A.E1.S1 \u2013 2022-09-06"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/659384","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=659384"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=659384"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=659384"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=659384"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=659384"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=659384"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=659384"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=659384"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}