{"id":664668,"date":"2026-04-23T23:01:40","date_gmt":"2026-04-23T21:01:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/kko-1076-2022-oikeudenkayntimenettely\/"},"modified":"2026-04-23T23:01:40","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T21:01:40","slug":"kko-1076-2022-oikeudenkayntimenettely","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko-1076-2022-oikeudenkayntimenettely\/","title":{"rendered":"KKO 1076\/2022 &#8211; Oikeudenk\u00e4yntimenettely"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Oikeusapua saavan syytetyn avustajaksi oli m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4tty asianajaja A, joka ei yleisesti hoitanut asianajoteht\u00e4vi\u00e4 kyseisess\u00e4 k\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeudessa. A oli vaatinut palkkiota muun ohella p\u00e4\u00e4k\u00e4sittelyyn saapumiseen kuluneelta matka-ajalta sek\u00e4 korvausta matkakuluista. K\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeus oli hyl\u00e4nnyt n\u00e4m\u00e4 vaatimukset kokonaisuudessaan.<\/p>\n<p>Korkein oikeus katsoi ratkaisustaan ilmenevill\u00e4 perusteilla, ett\u00e4 hovioikeuden olisi pit\u00e4nyt my\u00f6nt\u00e4\u00e4 A:lle jatkok\u00e4sittelylupa muutos- ja ennakkoratkaisuperusteella.<\/p>\n<h3>OK 25 a luku 11 \u00a7 1 mom 1 kohta<\/h3>\n<h3>OK 25 a luku 11 \u00a7 1 mom 3 kohta<\/h3>\n<h3>OikeusapuL 17 \u00a7 1 mom<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.finlex.fi\/en\/case-law\/supreme-court\/other-decision\/2022\/1076\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Finlex open data, CC BY 4.0. Documentation open data verifiee le 2026-04-12 ; les endpoints judgment documentes renvoient 404 pour les types case-law exposes par le frontend, fallback actuel sur les pages publiques data.finlex.fi.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Oikeusapua saavan syytetyn avustajaksi oli m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4tty asianajaja A, joka ei yleisesti hoitanut asianajoteht\u00e4vi\u00e4 kyseisess\u00e4 k\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeudessa. A oli vaatinut palkkiota muun ohella p\u00e4\u00e4k\u00e4sittelyyn saapumiseen kuluneelta matka-ajalta sek\u00e4 korvausta matkakuluista. K\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeus oli hyl\u00e4nnyt n\u00e4m\u00e4 vaatimukset kokonaisuudessaan. Korkein oikeus katsoi ratkaisustaan ilmenevill\u00e4 perusteilla, ett\u00e4 hovioikeuden olisi pit\u00e4nyt my\u00f6nt\u00e4\u00e4 A:lle jatkok\u00e4sittelylupa muutos- ja ennakkoratkaisuperusteella. OK 25 a luku 11&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7740],"kji_court":[7741],"kji_chamber":[8561],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[34516,9089,23941,34514,34515],"kji_language":[7949],"class_list":["post-664668","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-finlande","kji_court-cour-supreme-de-finlande","kji_chamber-autres-decisions","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-avustajaksi","kji_keyword-oikeudenkayntimenettely","kji_keyword-oikeusapua","kji_keyword-saavan","kji_keyword-syytetyn","kji_language-finnois"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>KKO 1076\/2022 - Oikeudenk\u00e4yntimenettely - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko-1076-2022-oikeudenkayntimenettely\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"KKO 1076\/2022 - Oikeudenk\u00e4yntimenettely\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Oikeusapua saavan syytetyn avustajaksi oli m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4tty asianajaja A, joka ei yleisesti hoitanut asianajoteht\u00e4vi\u00e4 kyseisess\u00e4 k\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeudessa. A oli vaatinut palkkiota muun ohella p\u00e4\u00e4k\u00e4sittelyyn saapumiseen kuluneelta matka-ajalta sek\u00e4 korvausta matkakuluista. K\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeus oli hyl\u00e4nnyt n\u00e4m\u00e4 vaatimukset kokonaisuudessaan. Korkein oikeus katsoi ratkaisustaan ilmenevill\u00e4 perusteilla, ett\u00e4 hovioikeuden olisi pit\u00e4nyt my\u00f6nt\u00e4\u00e4 A:lle jatkok\u00e4sittelylupa muutos- ja ennakkoratkaisuperusteella. OK 25 a luku 11...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko-1076-2022-oikeudenkayntimenettely\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kko-1076-2022-oikeudenkayntimenettely\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kko-1076-2022-oikeudenkayntimenettely\\\/\",\"name\":\"KKO 1076\\\/2022 - Oikeudenk\u00e4yntimenettely - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-23T21:01:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kko-1076-2022-oikeudenkayntimenettely\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kko-1076-2022-oikeudenkayntimenettely\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kko-1076-2022-oikeudenkayntimenettely\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"KKO 1076\\\/2022 &#8211; Oikeudenk\u00e4yntimenettely\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"KKO 1076\/2022 - Oikeudenk\u00e4yntimenettely - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko-1076-2022-oikeudenkayntimenettely\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"KKO 1076\/2022 - Oikeudenk\u00e4yntimenettely","og_description":"Oikeusapua saavan syytetyn avustajaksi oli m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4tty asianajaja A, joka ei yleisesti hoitanut asianajoteht\u00e4vi\u00e4 kyseisess\u00e4 k\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeudessa. A oli vaatinut palkkiota muun ohella p\u00e4\u00e4k\u00e4sittelyyn saapumiseen kuluneelta matka-ajalta sek\u00e4 korvausta matkakuluista. K\u00e4r\u00e4j\u00e4oikeus oli hyl\u00e4nnyt n\u00e4m\u00e4 vaatimukset kokonaisuudessaan. Korkein oikeus katsoi ratkaisustaan ilmenevill\u00e4 perusteilla, ett\u00e4 hovioikeuden olisi pit\u00e4nyt my\u00f6nt\u00e4\u00e4 A:lle jatkok\u00e4sittelylupa muutos- ja ennakkoratkaisuperusteella. OK 25 a luku 11...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko-1076-2022-oikeudenkayntimenettely\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"1 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko-1076-2022-oikeudenkayntimenettely\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko-1076-2022-oikeudenkayntimenettely\/","name":"KKO 1076\/2022 - Oikeudenk\u00e4yntimenettely - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-23T21:01:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko-1076-2022-oikeudenkayntimenettely\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko-1076-2022-oikeudenkayntimenettely\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kko-1076-2022-oikeudenkayntimenettely\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"KKO 1076\/2022 &#8211; Oikeudenk\u00e4yntimenettely"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/664668","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=664668"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=664668"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=664668"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=664668"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=664668"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=664668"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=664668"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=664668"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}