{"id":671776,"date":"2026-04-24T11:10:41","date_gmt":"2026-04-24T09:10:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5784-18-7t9lsb-l1-a-s1-2022-03-16-2\/"},"modified":"2026-04-24T11:10:41","modified_gmt":"2026-04-24T09:10:41","slug":"acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5784-18-7t9lsb-l1-a-s1-2022-03-16-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5784-18-7t9lsb-l1-a-s1-2022-03-16-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5784\/18.7T9LSB.L1-A.S1 \u2013 2022-03-16"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: NUNO GON?ALVES. I – O recurso extraordin?rio para fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia tem car?cter normativo, visando uniformizar crit?rios interpretativos que garantam a unidade do ordenamento jur?dico penal ou processual penal e, com isso, os princ?pios de seguran?a, da previsibilidade das decis?es judiciais e a igualdade dos cidad?os perante a lei. II – A oposi??o de julgados ? requisito substancial insupr?vel da admiss?o deste recurso extraordin?rio. III – Na fase de admiss?o (ou rejei??o) trata-se de verificar, partindo de uma factualidade equivalente, se a solu??o adotada no ac?rd?o recorrido, quanto a certa quest?o de direito, seria a que o mesmo julgador tomaria, se tivesse que decidir, na mesma ocasi?o, essa quest?o, no ac?rd?o fundamento e vice-versa. IV – A mesmidade da quest?o de direito pressup?e circunstancialismo f?ctico ou processual id?ntico ou equivalente do ponto de vista dos seus efeitos jur?dicos. V – N?o pode haver oposi??o ou contradi??o entre dois ac?rd?os, relativamente ? mesma quest?o fundamental de direito, quando s?o diversos os pressupostos de facto em que assentaram as respetivas decis?es.<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: NUNO GON?ALVES. I – O recurso extraordin?rio para fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia tem car?cter normativo, visando uniformizar crit?rios interpretativos que garantam a unidade do ordenamento jur?dico penal ou processual penal e, com isso, os princ?pios de seguran?a, da previsibilidade das decis?es judiciais e a igualdade dos cidad?os perante a lei. II – A oposi??o de julgados ? requisito substancial insupr?vel da admiss?o deste recurso extraordin?rio. III – Na fase de admiss?o (ou rejei??o) trata-se de verificar, partindo de uma factualidade equivalente, se a solu??o adotada no ac?rd?o recorrido, quanto a certa quest?o de direito, seria a que o mesmo julgador tomaria, se tivesse que decidir, na mesma ocasi?o, essa quest?o, no ac?rd?o fundamento e vice-versa. IV – A mesmidade da quest?o de direito pressup?e circunstancialismo f?ctico ou processual id?ntico ou equivalente do ponto de vista dos seus efeitos jur?dicos. V – N?o pode haver oposi??o ou contradi??o entre dois ac?rd?os, relativamente ? mesma quest?o fundamental de direito, quando s?o diversos os pressupostos de facto em que assentaram as respetivas decis?es.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[7763],"kji_chamber":[8484],"kji_year":[32183],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[7772,7774,7771,7773,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-671776","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-supremo-tribunal-de-justica","kji_chamber-3-seco","kji_year-32183","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-justica","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-supremo","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5784\/18.7T9LSB.L1-A.S1 \u2013 2022-03-16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5784-18-7t9lsb-l1-a-s1-2022-03-16-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5784\/18.7T9LSB.L1-A.S1 \u2013 2022-03-16\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: NUNO GON?ALVES. I - O recurso extraordin?rio para fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia tem car?cter normativo, visando uniformizar crit?rios interpretativos que garantam a unidade do ordenamento jur?dico penal ou processual penal e, com isso, os princ?pios de seguran?a, da previsibilidade das decis?es judiciais e a igualdade dos cidad?os perante a lei. II - A oposi??o de julgados ? requisito substancial insupr?vel da admiss?o deste recurso extraordin?rio. III - Na fase de admiss?o (ou rejei??o) trata-se de verificar, partindo de uma factualidade equivalente, se a solu??o adotada no ac?rd?o recorrido, quanto a certa quest?o de direito, seria a que o mesmo julgador tomaria, se tivesse que decidir, na mesma ocasi?o, essa quest?o, no ac?rd?o fundamento e vice-versa. IV - A mesmidade da quest?o de direito pressup?e circunstancialismo f?ctico ou processual id?ntico ou equivalente do ponto de vista dos seus efeitos jur?dicos. V - N?o pode haver oposi??o ou contradi??o entre dois ac?rd?os, relativamente ? mesma quest?o fundamental de direito, quando s?o diversos os pressupostos de facto em que assentaram as respetivas decis?es.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5784-18-7t9lsb-l1-a-s1-2022-03-16-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5784-18-7t9lsb-l1-a-s1-2022-03-16-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5784-18-7t9lsb-l1-a-s1-2022-03-16-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5784\\\/18.7T9LSB.L1-A.S1 \u2013 2022-03-16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-24T09:10:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5784-18-7t9lsb-l1-a-s1-2022-03-16-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5784-18-7t9lsb-l1-a-s1-2022-03-16-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5784-18-7t9lsb-l1-a-s1-2022-03-16-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5784\\\/18.7T9LSB.L1-A.S1 \u2013 2022-03-16\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5784\/18.7T9LSB.L1-A.S1 \u2013 2022-03-16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5784-18-7t9lsb-l1-a-s1-2022-03-16-2\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5784\/18.7T9LSB.L1-A.S1 \u2013 2022-03-16","og_description":"Relator: NUNO GON?ALVES. I - O recurso extraordin?rio para fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia tem car?cter normativo, visando uniformizar crit?rios interpretativos que garantam a unidade do ordenamento jur?dico penal ou processual penal e, com isso, os princ?pios de seguran?a, da previsibilidade das decis?es judiciais e a igualdade dos cidad?os perante a lei. II - A oposi??o de julgados ? requisito substancial insupr?vel da admiss?o deste recurso extraordin?rio. III - Na fase de admiss?o (ou rejei??o) trata-se de verificar, partindo de uma factualidade equivalente, se a solu??o adotada no ac?rd?o recorrido, quanto a certa quest?o de direito, seria a que o mesmo julgador tomaria, se tivesse que decidir, na mesma ocasi?o, essa quest?o, no ac?rd?o fundamento e vice-versa. IV - A mesmidade da quest?o de direito pressup?e circunstancialismo f?ctico ou processual id?ntico ou equivalente do ponto de vista dos seus efeitos jur?dicos. V - N?o pode haver oposi??o ou contradi??o entre dois ac?rd?os, relativamente ? mesma quest?o fundamental de direito, quando s?o diversos os pressupostos de facto em que assentaram as respetivas decis?es.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5784-18-7t9lsb-l1-a-s1-2022-03-16-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"1 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5784-18-7t9lsb-l1-a-s1-2022-03-16-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5784-18-7t9lsb-l1-a-s1-2022-03-16-2\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5784\/18.7T9LSB.L1-A.S1 \u2013 2022-03-16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-24T09:10:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5784-18-7t9lsb-l1-a-s1-2022-03-16-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5784-18-7t9lsb-l1-a-s1-2022-03-16-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/acordao-supremo-tribunal-de-justica-processo-5784-18-7t9lsb-l1-a-s1-2022-03-16-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Supremo Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a \u2013 Processo 5784\/18.7T9LSB.L1-A.S1 \u2013 2022-03-16"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/671776","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=671776"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=671776"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=671776"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=671776"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=671776"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=671776"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=671776"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=671776"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}