{"id":678327,"date":"2026-04-25T06:03:41","date_gmt":"2026-04-25T04:03:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/exn-v-alder-hey-childrens-nhs-foundation-trust-2\/"},"modified":"2026-04-25T06:03:41","modified_gmt":"2026-04-25T04:03:41","slug":"exn-v-alder-hey-childrens-nhs-foundation-trust-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/exn-v-alder-hey-childrens-nhs-foundation-trust-2\/","title":{"rendered":"EXN v Alder Hey Children&#8217;s NHS Foundation Trust"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Note: This judgment was produced for the parties, approved by the Judge, after using voice-recognition software during an ex tempore judgment. MR JUSTICE FORDHAM : 1. The purpose of today\u2019s hearing has been for me to consider whether the proposed settlement of the damages claim in this case is in the best interests of the Claimant who is aged 13 and is a protected party. His dad stands as his litigation friend and a Deputy has been appointed. An anonymity order was sought and provisional anonymisation was used in the cause list \u2013 publicly accessible through the \u201ccourtserve\u201d website \u2013 for today\u2019s hearing. I dealt with anonymity at the start of the hearing. The Defendant adopted a neutral position as to anonymity, but raised a helpful point in relation to notice in the third party application mechanisms for which the anonymity order would provide. No member of the press or public raised any objection to anonymity. I made an anonymity order. I was satisfied, having regard to the principles in X v Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust [2015] 1 WLR 3647, that anonymity is necessary. It is because of the anonymity order, which I have made for the protection of the Claimant, that I am calling him \u201cthe Claimant\u201d and I am going to refer to other family members without using anyone\u2019s name, in this judgment. 2. This is a clinical negligence case. On 19 September 2009, the Claimant (who was just 17 months old) suffered a focal seizure which affected the right side of his face. An ambulance was called, and he was taken to Alder Hey Children\u2019s Hospital. While in the A&amp;E department, he suffered a second focal seizure, while under observation by medical personnel. He was sent home and, despite re-attendance, was not diagnosed with the virus HSV until 24 September 2009. He sustained catastrophic brain injuries, leading to profound impairments, and intractable epilepsy. Proceedings were commenced in October 2018. Subsequently, the Defendant admitted breach of duty. Subject to one contested point, the Defendant also admitted causation of loss and damage. This was recorded when judgment was entered for the Claimant by DJ Jenkinson on 9 April 2020, the order stating that it was \u201cthe Defendant\u2019s case that the Claimant would always have suffered a mild residual cognitive deficit and epilepsy in any event and, therefore, to that extent, causation is still in dispute\u201d. The questions of quantum of damages, including that contested causation point, were listed for a ten-day trial due to take place in this Court, before me, starting on 1 November 2021. In the run up to the trial the parties arrived at the settlement, subject to the approval of the Court. As Mr Braithwaite QC emphasised, the Claimant\u2019s parents were only relieved of the pressure on them, two working days before the trial. 3. The Claimant suffers from severe learning difficulties, mild right hemiplegia, severe drug-resistant multifocal epilepsy, autism and severe behavioural problems with violent outbursts. He has very significant care needs. The relevant experts agree that he needs what is called in the papers \u201cdouble-up care\u201d, for the rest of his life. That means two carers caring for him 24\/7, including at night when one of the two carers can be sleeping but is \u2018on call\u2019 for when needed. The Claimant also needs specialist modified accommodation, specialist medical therapies and specialist equipment. What is proposed is that there be a lump sum award of \u00a37,750,000, from which credit is to be given in the sum of \u00a3225,000 in respect of previous interim payments and in the sum of \u00a38,584.60 in respect of the CRU (Compensation Recovery Unit) referable to payments made by the Defendant to the Department of Work and Pensions. I am invited to approve an apportionment which would involve a payment to the Claimant\u2019s Litigation Friend of the sum of \u00a3455,000 in respect of past gratuitous care and past final expenses met by the parents (calculated having regard to the interim payments received). The balance of the lump sum (\u00a37,061,415.40) will be payable into the Claimant\u2019s Deputyship Account. In addition to the lump sum, there are index-linked periodical payments, to be made throughout the Claimant\u2019s life. These are in respect of future care and case management, linked to the ASHE 6115 index, starting at \u00a3330,000 per year payable next month to continue until the Claimant is aged 19, and then at \u00a3337,500 per year for the rest of his life. The Claimant\u2019s team have helpfully given me their overall capitalised value of this award as being approximately \u00a327.3 million. 4. I have had the benefit of reading the very thorough confidential Advice dated 3 November 2021 written by the Claimant\u2019s junior Counsel Christopher Barnes. It sets out the reasons why he, and the Claimant\u2019s Leading Counsel Bill Braithwaite QC and the Claimant\u2019s solicitor Carla Duprey of Stephensons, consider that a settlement in these figures and structured in this way is in the Claimant\u2019s best interests. Mr Braithwaite QC describes the Advice \u2013 rightly \u2013 as an \u201cexcellent guide\u201d. I have been taken through the key features, including the unusual features, by Mr Braithwaite QC in his submissions today. I can see the very careful thought that has been given, and the positions that were adopted in the run up to trial. I also have the benefit of two confidential reports from an independent financial adviser, Richard Cropper, dated 16 July 2021 and 2 November 2021. These reports address the appropriateness of the form and structure of the award, and in particular of the periodical payments. I have had access to the trial bundles and have been able to consider relevant materials from within them in doing my job in relation to the question of approval of the settlement. 5. I am satisfied that the proposed settlement is a sensible settlement from the Claimant\u2019s point of view. I am happy to give my approval to the settlement. I will make an Order in the form that has been proposed, circulated and considered. My Order \u2013 a document available from the court files \u2013 will contain the appropriate recitals, including recording my satisfaction of features relating to the periodical payments orders being made and as to the payment regarding the apportionment. There will, as agreed, be an order for costs and for a further interim payment on account of costs of \u00a3175,000. 6. This approval hearing took place fully in-person in Manchester, with everyone present in the court room. That was what mum and dad wanted and I agreed with them and with the Claimant\u2019s legal representatives that it was appropriate. I have been able to read, in the papers before the Court, about those events of September 2009, and how the Claimant had been a healthy toddler who was developing normally, could walk unaided and was speaking his first few words. I have read about how the world of each of the members of the family was \u201cturned upside down\u201d. I have seen descriptions of what the position was at various stages during the twelve years and two months, since September 2009. That has included the seizures which had begun at the end of 2010, described as ten to twenty seizures every day including four or more every night, seizures which needed mum or dad to be standing behind the Claimant with arms wrapped tightly around him, to help him; and which later came to include \u201cdrop seizures\u201d, meaning the Claimant using a wheelchair and wearing a helmet when out and about. I have read witness statements and I have seen photos. I have learned about how mum and dad came to operate, like a \u201ctag team\u201d, so that one of them was with the Claimant at all times. That was usually mum, especially when dad was at work as a finance director. It was one parent sleeping alongside the Claimant at night. It is a story of married partners and parents feeling like \u201cpassing ships\u201d; feeling low; feeling that they had \u201chardly any time\u201d to devote to the Claimant\u2019s older sister. But I have also read about the Claimant\u2019s beautiful smile when he gets to be driven around in dad\u2019s car; and how it is when he is having fun in the pool. 7. The Claimants\u2019 lawyers have told me about how mum and dad had to cope with these most traumatic events, and these most difficult circumstances, and responded by meeting the Claimant\u2019s needs by themselves. As the lawyers put it, the fact that the Claimant is doing as well as he is is a reflection, mum and dad, of your devoted action. Mr Braithwaite QC \u2013 on behalf of himself, Mr Barnes and Ms Duprey \u2013 told me that even in the short time that Counsel have represented the Claimant it has \u201cshone out to them\u201d how extremely difficult this has been and how well they have coped. Mr Gimlette, on behalf of the Defendant, put the position in this way: nobody reading the papers in this case could fail to recognise the tireless and remarkable care provided by the Claimant\u2019s parents and family. Mr Gimlette has also informed the Court that a letter of apology was sent to the Claimant\u2019s parents in this case in September and that an apology has been given on behalf the Defendant by its Leading Counsel. 8. I found a vivid description in the papers which I have read. It is a description which tells the Court about how, as parents: you \u201clost your sense of self\u201d, being \u201cthrust into the role of full-time carers\u201d; becoming \u201cconsumed\u201d by \u201ccaring for and looking after\u201d your vulnerable son, who was reliant on you, 24\/7. Three words encapsulate your response as parents: you were \u201cconsumed by caring\u201d. In addition to recording in that way this Court\u2019s tribute to you, may I also thank you for thinking to tell the Court about your daughter\u2019s essay: the one she wrote at school, from her own experiences as the Claimant\u2019s sister, about \u201chidden disability\u201d and about not judging people. That is particularly poignant having in mind behavioural consequences of injuries, as in this case. And thank you for enabling me to finish this approval judgment by mentioning a trip to PC World, a couple of years ago. It was a trip which had the Claimant sitting in an enclosed area on a video game, in a driver\u2019s seat, behind a steering wheel. He loved it. So much so \u2013 you tell me \u2013 that you struggled to get him off it. 8.11.21<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk\/ewhc\/qb\/2021\/2989\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Open Justice Licence (The National Archives).<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Note: This judgment was produced for the parties, approved by the Judge, after using voice-recognition software during an ex tempore judgment. MR JUSTICE FORDHAM : 1. The purpose of today\u2019s hearing has been for me to consider whether the proposed settlement of the damages claim in this case is in the best interests of the Claimant who is aged 13&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7608],"kji_court":[33569],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[36297],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[9056,7643,7697,7707,9168],"kji_language":[7611],"class_list":["post-678327","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-royaume-uni","kji_court-high-court-queens-bench-division","kji_year-36297","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-anonymity","kji_keyword-claimant","kji_keyword-defendant","kji_keyword-order","kji_keyword-settlement","kji_language-anglais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>EXN v Alder Hey Children&#039;s NHS Foundation Trust - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/exn-v-alder-hey-childrens-nhs-foundation-trust-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"EXN v Alder Hey Children&#039;s NHS Foundation Trust\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Note: This judgment was produced for the parties, approved by the Judge, after using voice-recognition software during an ex tempore judgment. MR JUSTICE FORDHAM : 1. The purpose of today\u2019s hearing has been for me to consider whether the proposed settlement of the damages claim in this case is in the best interests of the Claimant who is aged 13...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/exn-v-alder-hey-childrens-nhs-foundation-trust-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"9 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/exn-v-alder-hey-childrens-nhs-foundation-trust-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/exn-v-alder-hey-childrens-nhs-foundation-trust-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"EXN v Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-25T04:03:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/exn-v-alder-hey-childrens-nhs-foundation-trust-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/exn-v-alder-hey-childrens-nhs-foundation-trust-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/exn-v-alder-hey-childrens-nhs-foundation-trust-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"EXN v Alder Hey Children&rsquo;s NHS Foundation Trust\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"EXN v Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/exn-v-alder-hey-childrens-nhs-foundation-trust-2\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"EXN v Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust","og_description":"Note: This judgment was produced for the parties, approved by the Judge, after using voice-recognition software during an ex tempore judgment. MR JUSTICE FORDHAM : 1. The purpose of today\u2019s hearing has been for me to consider whether the proposed settlement of the damages claim in this case is in the best interests of the Claimant who is aged 13...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/exn-v-alder-hey-childrens-nhs-foundation-trust-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"9 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/exn-v-alder-hey-childrens-nhs-foundation-trust-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/exn-v-alder-hey-childrens-nhs-foundation-trust-2\/","name":"EXN v Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-25T04:03:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/exn-v-alder-hey-childrens-nhs-foundation-trust-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/exn-v-alder-hey-childrens-nhs-foundation-trust-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/exn-v-alder-hey-childrens-nhs-foundation-trust-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"EXN v Alder Hey Children&rsquo;s NHS Foundation Trust"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/678327","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=678327"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=678327"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=678327"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=678327"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=678327"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=678327"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=678327"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=678327"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}