{"id":699191,"date":"2026-04-26T23:58:24","date_gmt":"2026-04-26T21:58:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr20231647-hoge-raad-24-11-2023-22-04643\/"},"modified":"2026-04-26T23:58:24","modified_gmt":"2026-04-26T21:58:24","slug":"eclinlhr20231647-hoge-raad-24-11-2023-22-04643","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr20231647-hoge-raad-24-11-2023-22-04643\/","title":{"rendered":"ECLI:NL:HR:2023:1647 Hoge Raad , 24-11-2023 \/ 22\/04643"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Inhoudsindicatie.<\/strong> Art. 81 lid 1 RO. Burgerlijk procesrecht. Niet-ontvankelijkverklaring in hoger beroep wegens overschrijding appelgrens (art. 332 lid 1 Rv) nadat de zaak al inhoudelijk was behandeld.<\/p>\n

HOGE RAAD DER NEDERLANDEN<\/p>\n

CIVIELE KAMER<\/p>\n

Nummer 22\/04643<\/p>\n

Datum 24 november 2023<\/p>\n

ARREST<\/p>\n

In de zaak van<\/p>\n

[betrokkene],<\/p>\n

wonende te [woonplaats],<\/p>\n

EISER tot cassatie,<\/p>\n

hierna: [betrokkene],<\/p>\n

advocaat: J. van Weerden,<\/p>\n

tegen<\/p>\n

DE STAAT DER NEDERLANDEN, vertegenwoordigd door de DIENST UITVOERING ONDERWIJS,<\/p>\n

gevestigd te Groningen,<\/p>\n

VERWEERDER in cassatie,<\/p>\n

hierna: DUO,<\/p>\n

niet verschenen.<\/p>\n

1Procesverloop<\/h3>\n

Voor het verloop van het geding in feitelijke instanties verwijst de Hoge Raad naar:<\/p>\n

a. de vonnissen in de zaak C\/18\/183598\/HA ZA 18-86 van de rechtbank Noord-Nederland van 5 december 2018, 4 september 2019, 22 juli 2020 en 27 januari 2021;<\/p>\n

b. de arresten in de zaak 200.295.506\/01 van het gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden van 20 juli 2021 en 13 september 2022.<\/p>\n

[betrokkene] heeft tegen het arrest van het hof van 13 september 2022 beroep in cassatie ingesteld.<\/p>\n

Tegen DUO is verstek verleend.<\/p>\n

De conclusie van de Advocaat-Generaal R.H. de Bock strekt tot verwerping van het cassatieberoep.<\/p>\n

De advocaat van [betrokkene] heeft schriftelijk op die conclusie gereageerd.<\/p>\n

2Beoordeling van het middel<\/h3>\n

De Hoge Raad heeft de klachten over het arrest van het hof beoordeeld. De uitkomst hiervan is dat deze klachten niet kunnen leiden tot vernietiging van dat arrest. De Hoge Raad hoeft niet te motiveren waarom hij tot dit oordeel is gekomen. Bij de beoordeling van deze klachten is het namelijk niet nodig om antwoord te geven op vragen die van belang zijn voor de eenheid of de ontwikkeling van het recht (zie artikel 81 lid 1 van de Wet op de rechterlijke organisatie).<\/p>\n

3Beslissing<\/h3>\n

De Hoge Raad:<\/p>\n

– verwerpt het beroep;<\/p>\n

– veroordeelt [betrokkene] in de kosten van het geding in cassatie, tot op deze uitspraak aan de zijde van DUO begroot op nihil.<\/p>\n

Dit arrest is gewezen door de vicepresident M.J. Kroeze als voorzitter en de raadsheren T.H. Tanja-van den Broek, H.M. Wattendorff, G.C. Makkink en K. Teuben, en in het openbaar uitgesproken door de raadsheer F.J.P. Lock op 24 november 2023.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Rechtspraak.nl open data, Creative Commons Zero. Volume cible 1.8M decisions.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Art. 81 lid 1 RO. Burgerlijk procesrecht. Niet-ontvankelijkverklaring in hoger beroep wegens overschrijding appelgrens (art. 332 lid 1 Rv) nadat de zaak al inhoudelijk was behandeld.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7669],"kji_court":[7834],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[24566],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[7992,19085,10203,13023,7845],"kji_language":[7671],"class_list":["post-699191","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-pays-bas","kji_court-hoge-raad","kji_year-24566","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-beroep","kji_keyword-burgerlijk","kji_keyword-hoger","kji_keyword-niet-ontvankelijkverklaring","kji_keyword-procesrecht","kji_language-nl"],"yoast_head":"\nECLI:NL:HR:2023:1647 Hoge Raad , 24-11-2023 \/ 22\/04643 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr20231647-hoge-raad-24-11-2023-22-04643\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ECLI:NL:HR:2023:1647 Hoge Raad , 24-11-2023 \/ 22\/04643\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Art. 81 lid 1 RO. Burgerlijk procesrecht. Niet-ontvankelijkverklaring in hoger beroep wegens overschrijding appelgrens (art. 332 lid 1 Rv) nadat de zaak al inhoudelijk was behandeld.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr20231647-hoge-raad-24-11-2023-22-04643\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr20231647-hoge-raad-24-11-2023-22-04643\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr20231647-hoge-raad-24-11-2023-22-04643\\\/\",\"name\":\"ECLI:NL:HR:2023:1647 Hoge Raad , 24-11-2023 \\\/ 22\\\/04643 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-26T21:58:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr20231647-hoge-raad-24-11-2023-22-04643\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr20231647-hoge-raad-24-11-2023-22-04643\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/eclinlhr20231647-hoge-raad-24-11-2023-22-04643\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"ECLI:NL:HR:2023:1647 Hoge Raad , 24-11-2023 \\\/ 22\\\/04643\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ECLI:NL:HR:2023:1647 Hoge Raad , 24-11-2023 \/ 22\/04643 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr20231647-hoge-raad-24-11-2023-22-04643\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"ECLI:NL:HR:2023:1647 Hoge Raad , 24-11-2023 \/ 22\/04643","og_description":"Art. 81 lid 1 RO. Burgerlijk procesrecht. Niet-ontvankelijkverklaring in hoger beroep wegens overschrijding appelgrens (art. 332 lid 1 Rv) nadat de zaak al inhoudelijk was behandeld.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr20231647-hoge-raad-24-11-2023-22-04643\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"2 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr20231647-hoge-raad-24-11-2023-22-04643\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr20231647-hoge-raad-24-11-2023-22-04643\/","name":"ECLI:NL:HR:2023:1647 Hoge Raad , 24-11-2023 \/ 22\/04643 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-26T21:58:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr20231647-hoge-raad-24-11-2023-22-04643\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr20231647-hoge-raad-24-11-2023-22-04643\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/eclinlhr20231647-hoge-raad-24-11-2023-22-04643\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ECLI:NL:HR:2023:1647 Hoge Raad , 24-11-2023 \/ 22\/04643"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/699191","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=699191"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=699191"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=699191"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=699191"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=699191"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=699191"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=699191"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=699191"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}