{"id":790658,"date":"2026-04-30T23:41:30","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T21:41:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/kho-8-5-2018-2090-barnskydd-2\/"},"modified":"2026-04-30T23:41:30","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T21:41:30","slug":"kho-8-5-2018-2090-barnskydd-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-8-5-2018-2090-barnskydd-2\/","title":{"rendered":"KHO 8.5.2018\/2090 &#8211; Barnskydd"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade godk\u00e4nt den ledande tj\u00e4nsteinnehavaren f\u00f6r socialv\u00e5rdens ans\u00f6kan om omh\u00e4ndertagande och placering av barnet i v\u00e5rd utom hemmet enligt ans\u00f6kan, bland annat vad g\u00e4llde platsen f\u00f6r v\u00e5rd utom hemmet.<\/p>\n<p>Barnskyddsmyndigheten hade emellertid under \u00e4rendets handl\u00e4ggning i f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen permanent \u00e4ndrat platsen f\u00f6r v\u00e5rd utom hemmet. Myndigheten hade inte meddelat f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen om sitt beslut med vilket platsen f\u00f6r v\u00e5rd utom hemmet hade \u00e4ndrats, s\u00e5som det f\u00f6ruts\u00e4tts enligt 25 d \u00a7 2 mom. i barnskyddslagen. Myndigheten hade inte heller meddelat \u00e5t f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen att platsen f\u00f6r v\u00e5rd utom hemmet som avs\u00e5gs i ans\u00f6kan inte p\u00e5 grund av fostermammans sjukdom l\u00e4ngre var tillg\u00e4nglig. Myndigheten hade inte heller \u00e4ndrat sin ans\u00f6kan g\u00e4llande platsen f\u00f6r v\u00e5rd utom hemmet.<\/p>\n<p>H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen ans\u00e5g att f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolens beslut hade grundat sig p\u00e5 ett misstag som berodde p\u00e5 fel i barnskyddsmyndighetens f\u00f6rfarande. I beslutet som \u00f6verklagades hade d\u00e4rf\u00f6r inte avgjorts fr\u00e5gan som g\u00e4llde valet av plats f\u00f6r v\u00e5rd utom hemmet enligt 50 \u00a7 i barnskyddslagen s\u00e5som det f\u00f6ruts\u00e4tts i lagen.<\/p>\n<p>H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen upph\u00e4vde och undanr\u00f6jde f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolens beslut till den del det g\u00e4llde platsen f\u00f6r v\u00e5rd utom hemmet och \u00e5terf\u00f6rvisade \u00e4rendet till denna del till f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen f\u00f6r ny pr\u00f6vning. F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen skulle, efter att ha mottagit barnskyddsmyndighetens reviderade ans\u00f6kan om omh\u00e4ndertagande, bed\u00f6ma om den i ans\u00f6kan avsedda platsen f\u00f6r v\u00e5rd utom hemmet uppfyllde kraven enligt 50 \u00a7 i barnskyddslagen. H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen beslutade \u00e4ven att under \u00e4rendets handl\u00e4ggning i f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen skulle barnets v\u00e5rd utom hemmet forts\u00e4tta p\u00e5 den plats d\u00e4r barnskyddsmyndigheten hade placerat barnet med sitt beslut om \u00e4ndring av platsen f\u00f6r v\u00e5rd utom hemmet.<\/p>\n<p>Barnskyddslagen 25 d \u00a7 2 ja 3 mom., 43 \u00a7 2 mom., 44 \u00a7 1 mom. 5 punkten och 50 \u00a7<\/p>\n<p>\u00c4rendet har avgjorts av justitier\u00e5den Niilo J\u00e4\u00e4skinen, Eija Siitari, Outi Suviranta, Timo R\u00e4bin\u00e4 och Toomas Kotkas. F\u00f6redragande Annina Nieminen.<\/p>\n<p>Hallinto-oikeus oli hyv\u00e4ksynyt lapsen huostaanottoa ja sijaishuoltoon sijoittamista koskevan hakemuksen sosiaalihuollon johtavan viranhaltijan esitt\u00e4m\u00e4n sis\u00e4lt\u00f6isen\u00e4 muun ohella sijaishuoltopaikan osalta.<\/p>\n<p>Lastensuojeluviranomainen oli kuitenkin asian hallinto-oikeusk\u00e4sittelyn aikana muuttanut lapsen sijaishuoltopaikkaa pysyv\u00e4isluonteisesti. Viranomainen ei ollut, toisin kuin lastensuojelulain 25 d \u00a7:n 2 momentissa edellytet\u00e4\u00e4n, ilmoittanut hallinto-oikeudelle tietoa lapsen sijaishuoltopaikan muuttamista koskevasta p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksest\u00e4\u00e4n. Viranomainen ei my\u00f6sk\u00e4\u00e4n ollut ilmoittanut hallinto-oikeudelle tietoa siit\u00e4, ett\u00e4 hakemuksen mukainen sijaishuoltopaikka ei en\u00e4\u00e4 ollut tosiasiallisesti k\u00e4ytett\u00e4viss\u00e4 sijais\u00e4idin sairastumisen vuoksi, eik\u00e4 viranomainen ollut muuttanut hakemustaan sijaishuoltopaikan osalta.<\/p>\n<p>Korkein hallinto-oikeus katsoi, ett\u00e4 hallinto-oikeuden p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s oli perustunut lastensuojeluviranomaisen menettelyvirheest\u00e4 johtuvaan erehdykseen, ja t\u00e4m\u00e4 oli vaikuttanut olennaisesti hallinto-oikeuden p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen sis\u00e4lt\u00f6\u00f6n. Valituksenalaisessa p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksess\u00e4 ei siten ollut lain edellytt\u00e4m\u00e4ll\u00e4 tavalla asianmukaisesti ratkaistu kysymyst\u00e4 lapsen lastensuojelulain 50 \u00a7:n mukaisesta sijaishuoltopaikasta.<\/p>\n<p>Korkein hallinto-oikeus kumosi ja poisti hallinto-oikeuden p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksen sijaishuoltopaikan osalta ja palautti asian t\u00e4lt\u00e4 osin hallinto-oikeuteen uudelleen k\u00e4sitelt\u00e4v\u00e4ksi. Hallinto-oikeuden tuli saatuaan lastensuojeluviranomaisen tarkistetun huostaanottohakemuksen arvioida, t\u00e4ytt\u00e4\u00e4k\u00f6 hakemuksen mukainen sijaishuoltopaikka lastensuojelulain 50 \u00a7:n mukaiset edellytykset. Samalla korkein hallinto-oikeus m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4si, ett\u00e4 lapsen sijoitusta jatketaan hallinto-oikeusk\u00e4sittelyn ajan siin\u00e4 paikassa, johon lastensuojeluviranomainen oli lapsen sijoittanut sijaishuoltopaikan muuttamista koskeneella p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksell\u00e4\u00e4n.<\/p>\n<h3>Lastensuojelulaki 25 d \u00a7 2 ja 3 momentti, 43 \u00a7 2 momentti, 44 \u00a7 1 momentti 5 kohta ja 50 \u00a7<\/h3>\n<p>Asian ovat ratkaisseet oikeusneuvokset Niilo J\u00e4\u00e4skinen, Eija Siitari, Outi Suviranta, Timo R\u00e4bin\u00e4 ja Toomas Kotkas. Asian esittelij\u00e4 Annina Nieminen.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.finlex.fi\/en\/case-law\/supreme-administrative-court\/decision-summary\/2018\/2090\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Finlex open data, CC BY 4.0. Documentation open data verifiee le 2026-04-12 ; les endpoints judgment documentes renvoient 404 pour les types case-law exposes par le frontend, fallback actuel sur les pages publiques data.finlex.fi.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade godk\u00e4nt den ledande tj\u00e4nsteinnehavaren f\u00f6r socialv\u00e5rdens ans\u00f6kan om omh\u00e4ndertagande och placering av barnet i v\u00e5rd utom hemmet enligt ans\u00f6kan, bland annat vad g\u00e4llde platsen f\u00f6r v\u00e5rd utom hemmet. Barnskyddsmyndigheten hade emellertid under \u00e4rendets handl\u00e4ggning i f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen permanent \u00e4ndrat platsen f\u00f6r v\u00e5rd utom hemmet. Myndigheten hade inte meddelat f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen om sitt beslut med vilket&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7740],"kji_court":[28668],"kji_chamber":[31727],"kji_year":[47917],"kji_subject":[7712],"kji_keyword":[19363,28998,28676,29870,33667],"kji_language":[7746],"class_list":["post-790658","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-finlande","kji_court-cour-supreme-administrative-de-finlande","kji_chamber-sommaires","kji_year-47917","kji_subject-social","kji_keyword-ansokan","kji_keyword-barnskydd","kji_keyword-forvaltningsdomstolen","kji_keyword-godkant","kji_keyword-hemmet","kji_language-multilingue"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>KHO 8.5.2018\/2090 - Barnskydd - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-8-5-2018-2090-barnskydd-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"KHO 8.5.2018\/2090 - Barnskydd\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade godk\u00e4nt den ledande tj\u00e4nsteinnehavaren f\u00f6r socialv\u00e5rdens ans\u00f6kan om omh\u00e4ndertagande och placering av barnet i v\u00e5rd utom hemmet enligt ans\u00f6kan, bland annat vad g\u00e4llde platsen f\u00f6r v\u00e5rd utom hemmet. Barnskyddsmyndigheten hade emellertid under \u00e4rendets handl\u00e4ggning i f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen permanent \u00e4ndrat platsen f\u00f6r v\u00e5rd utom hemmet. Myndigheten hade inte meddelat f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen om sitt beslut med vilket...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-8-5-2018-2090-barnskydd-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-8-5-2018-2090-barnskydd-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-8-5-2018-2090-barnskydd-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"KHO 8.5.2018\\\/2090 - Barnskydd - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-30T21:41:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-8-5-2018-2090-barnskydd-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-8-5-2018-2090-barnskydd-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-8-5-2018-2090-barnskydd-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"KHO 8.5.2018\\\/2090 &#8211; Barnskydd\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"KHO 8.5.2018\/2090 - Barnskydd - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-8-5-2018-2090-barnskydd-2\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"KHO 8.5.2018\/2090 - Barnskydd","og_description":"F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade godk\u00e4nt den ledande tj\u00e4nsteinnehavaren f\u00f6r socialv\u00e5rdens ans\u00f6kan om omh\u00e4ndertagande och placering av barnet i v\u00e5rd utom hemmet enligt ans\u00f6kan, bland annat vad g\u00e4llde platsen f\u00f6r v\u00e5rd utom hemmet. Barnskyddsmyndigheten hade emellertid under \u00e4rendets handl\u00e4ggning i f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen permanent \u00e4ndrat platsen f\u00f6r v\u00e5rd utom hemmet. Myndigheten hade inte meddelat f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen om sitt beslut med vilket...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-8-5-2018-2090-barnskydd-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"3 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-8-5-2018-2090-barnskydd-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-8-5-2018-2090-barnskydd-2\/","name":"KHO 8.5.2018\/2090 - Barnskydd - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-30T21:41:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-8-5-2018-2090-barnskydd-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-8-5-2018-2090-barnskydd-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-8-5-2018-2090-barnskydd-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"KHO 8.5.2018\/2090 &#8211; Barnskydd"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/790658","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=790658"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=790658"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=790658"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=790658"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=790658"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=790658"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=790658"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=790658"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}