{"id":804800,"date":"2026-05-01T12:09:38","date_gmt":"2026-05-01T10:09:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/kho-29-12-2017-6937-utlanningsarende\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T12:09:38","modified_gmt":"2026-05-01T10:09:38","slug":"kho-29-12-2017-6937-utlanningsarende","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-29-12-2017-6937-utlanningsarende\/","title":{"rendered":"KHO 29.12.2017\/6937 &#8211; Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Migrationsverket hade avslagit ans\u00f6kan till den del det g\u00e4llde uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd f\u00f6r arbetstagare med h\u00e4nvisning till att s\u00f6kanden \u00e4ventyrade allm\u00e4n ordning och s\u00e4kerhet samt Finlands internationella f\u00f6rbindelser p\u00e5 det s\u00e4tt som avses i 36 \u00a7 1 momentet i utl\u00e4nningslagen. I Migrationsverkets beslut n\u00e4mndes att Skyddspolisen givit ett utl\u00e5tande i \u00e4rendet, enligt vilket s\u00f6kanden kunde anses utg\u00f6ra en fara f\u00f6r Finlands allm\u00e4nna ordning och interna s\u00e4kerhet.<\/p>\n<p>F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen h\u00e4nvisade i sitt beslut till \u00e4ndrings\u00f6kandens eventuella bakgrund som soldat i Tunisiens arm\u00e9 samt Skyddspolisens utl\u00e5tande och konstaterade att Migrationsverket med st\u00f6d av 36 \u00a7 1 momentet i utl\u00e4nningslagen hade kunnat avvisa uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5ndsans\u00f6kan.<\/p>\n<p>H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen konstaterade att f\u00f6r att tillgodose kraven enligt 13 artikeln i Europeiska m\u00e4nniskor\u00e4ttskonventionen samt 21 \u00a7 i grundlagen ska f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen pr\u00f6va om det i \u00e4rendet har uppn\u00e5tts en r\u00e4ttvis balans mellan individens r\u00e4ttigheter och det allm\u00e4nna intresset, dvs. allm\u00e4n ordning och statens s\u00e4kerhet. Av Europeiska m\u00e4nniskor\u00e4ttsdomstolens r\u00e4ttspraxis framg\u00e5r att r\u00e4tten att ta del av allt de relevanta material som lagts fram vid r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ngen inte \u00e4r absolut, men den ol\u00e4genhet som begr\u00e4nsningen av denna r\u00e4tt medf\u00f6r parten b\u00f6r minimeras vid r\u00e4tteg\u00e5ngen. Om material undantas fr\u00e5n partsoffentligheten i den nationella s\u00e4kerhetens namn ska domstolen pr\u00f6va myndighetens beslutsfattande f\u00f6r att f\u00f6rs\u00e4kra att beslutfattandet uppfyller l\u00e4mpliga krav. \u00c4ven EU-domstolen samt h\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen och h\u00f6gsta domstolen har bifallit motsvarande principer i sin r\u00e4ttspraxis.<\/p>\n<p>H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen konstaterade att f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen i sitt beslut g\u00e4llande uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd f\u00f6r arbetstagare hade h\u00e4nvisat till Skyddspolisens utl\u00e5tande utan att ha granskat de omst\u00e4ndigheter och den utredning som l\u00e5g till grund f\u00f6r utl\u00e5tandet. Eftersom f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen inte hade granskat grunderna till Skyddspolisens utl\u00e5tande hade f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen inte kunnat pr\u00f6va om slutsatserna som framgick av utl\u00e5tandet var grundade. F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade d\u00e4rmed inte heller kunnat pr\u00f6va om de grunder g\u00e4llande det allm\u00e4nna intresset samt allm\u00e4n ordning och nationell s\u00e4kerhet som framgick av utl\u00e5tandet hade varit tillr\u00e4ckligt v\u00e4gande i f\u00f6rh\u00e5llande till individens intressen f\u00f6r att motivera att uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5ndet avvisades.<\/p>\n<p>H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen ans\u00e5g p\u00e5 ovan n\u00e4mnda grunder med h\u00e4nvisning till 33 \u00a7 i f\u00f6rvaltningsprocesslagen att f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen inte hade sett till att \u00e4rendet som g\u00e4llde uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd hade blivit utrett i den utstr\u00e4ckning som beh\u00f6vdes f\u00f6r att pr\u00f6va \u00e4rendet. D\u00e4rf\u00f6r upph\u00e4vdes f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolens beslut till den del det g\u00e4llde uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd f\u00f6r arbetstagare, avvisning och inresef\u00f6rbud och \u00e4rendet \u00e5tervisades till f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen f\u00f6r ny pr\u00f6vning. H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen har inte till n\u00e5gon del avgjort fr\u00e5gan som g\u00e4ller partens r\u00e4tt att ta del av utredningen som h\u00e4nf\u00f6r sig till Skyddspolisens utl\u00e5tande. F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen ska avg\u00f6ra detta efter att ha tagit del av utredningen.<\/p>\n<h3>Europeiska m\u00e4nniskor\u00e4ttsdomstolen 13 artikeln<\/h3>\n<h3>Grundlagen 21 \u00a7<\/h3>\n<h3>F\u00f6rvaltningsprocesslagen 33 \u00a7<\/h3>\n<p>Europeiska m\u00e4nniskor\u00e4ttsdomstolens dom i \u00e4rendet Regner v. Tjeckien 19.9.2017<\/p>\n<p>Europeiska unionens domstols dom C-300\/11, ZZ v. F\u00f6renade kungariket, 4.6.2013<\/p>\n<h3>HFD 2007:48<\/h3>\n<h3>HD 2016:20<\/h3>\n<p>Maahanmuuttovirasto oli hyl\u00e4nnyt hakemuksen ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4n oleskeluluvan osalta, koska hakijan katsottiin vaarantavan yleist\u00e4 j\u00e4rjestyst\u00e4 ja turvallisuutta ja Suomen kansainv\u00e4lisi\u00e4 suhteita ulkomaalaislain 36 \u00a7:n 1 momentin tarkoittamalla tavalla. Maahanmuuttoviraston p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksess\u00e4 mainittiin, ett\u00e4 Suojelupoliisi oli antanut hakijan asiassa lausunnon, jossa katsottiin hakijan voivan muodostaa vaaran Suomen yleiselle j\u00e4rjestykselle ja sis\u00e4iselle turvallisuudelle.<\/p>\n<p>Hallinto-oikeus oli perustellessaan valituksen hylk\u00e4\u00e4mist\u00e4 ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4n oleskeluluvan osalta katsonut, ett\u00e4 kun otettiin huomioon valittajan mahdollinen tausta Tunisian armeijan sotilaana sek\u00e4 Suojelupoliisin asiassa antama lausunto, Maahanmuuttovirasto oli voinut hyl\u00e4t\u00e4 valittajan oleskelulupahakemuksen ulkomaalaislain 36 \u00a7:n 1 momentissa tarkoitetulla perusteella.<\/p>\n<p>Korkein hallinto-oikeus totesi, ett\u00e4 Euroopan ihmisoikeussopimuksen 13 artiklan samoin kuin perustuslain 21 \u00a7:n mukaisten vaatimusten t\u00e4ytt\u00e4miseksi on hallintotuomioistuimen teht\u00e4v\u00e4n\u00e4 tutkia, onko valittajan oikeuksien ja kansallisesta turvallisuudesta johtuvien intressien v\u00e4lill\u00e4 asiassa saavutettu oikeudenmukainen tasapaino. Euroopan ihmisoikeustuomioistuimen vakiintuneessa oikeusk\u00e4yt\u00e4nn\u00f6ss\u00e4 on katsottu, ettei oikeus saada tieto kaikesta oikeudenk\u00e4ynniss\u00e4 esitetyst\u00e4 relevantista selvityksest\u00e4 ole ehdoton, mutta t\u00e4m\u00e4n oikeuden rajoituksista aiheutuvaa haittaa asianosaiselle tulee pyrki\u00e4 lievent\u00e4m\u00e4\u00e4n oikeudenk\u00e4ynniss\u00e4. Jos tietoa selvityksest\u00e4 ei voida yleisen edun vuoksi antaa asianosaiselle, tuomioistuimen tulee tutkia viranomaisen p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksenteko sen varmistamiseksi, ett\u00e4 p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksenteko t\u00e4ytt\u00e4\u00e4 asianmukaiset vaatimukset. Vastaavat periaatteet on hyv\u00e4ksytty my\u00f6s Euroopan unionin tuomioistuimen oikeusk\u00e4yt\u00e4nn\u00f6ss\u00e4 sek\u00e4 korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden ja korkeimman oikeuden oikeusk\u00e4yt\u00e4nn\u00f6ss\u00e4.<\/p>\n<p>Korkein hallinto-oikeus totesi, ett\u00e4 hallinto-oikeus oli osittain perustellut ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4n oleskelulupaa koskevaa p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6st\u00e4\u00e4n Suojelupoliisin antamalla lausunnolla kuitenkaan perehtym\u00e4tt\u00e4 lausunnon perusteena oleviin seikkoihin ja selvitykseen. Koska hallinto-oikeus ei ollut selvitt\u00e4nyt asian k\u00e4sittelyn aikana Suojelupoliisin lausunnon perusteena olevia seikkoja, hallinto-oikeus ei ollut voinut arvioida, oliko lausunnosta ilmeneville johtop\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksille ollut perusteita. Hallinto-oikeus ei siten ollut my\u00f6sk\u00e4\u00e4n asiallisesti voinut punnita sit\u00e4, olivatko lausunnosta ilmenev\u00e4t yleisen edun sek\u00e4 yleisen j\u00e4rjestyksen ja valtion turvallisuuden perusteet olleet yksityiseen etuun n\u00e4hden riitt\u00e4v\u00e4n painavia oikeuttamaan oleskeluluvan ep\u00e4\u00e4misen.<\/p>\n<p>Edell\u00e4 mainitulla perusteella korkein hallinto-oikeus katsoi, ett\u00e4 hallinto-oikeus ei ollut hallintolaink\u00e4ytt\u00f6lain 33 \u00a7:n mukaisesti huolehtinut siit\u00e4, ett\u00e4 oleskelulupa-asia on tullut selvitetyksi riitt\u00e4v\u00e4sti, jotta sit\u00e4 koskeva valitus voidaan ratkaista. T\u00e4m\u00e4n vuoksi hallinto-oikeuden p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s kumottiin ty\u00f6ntekij\u00e4n oleskeluluvan, k\u00e4\u00e4nnytt\u00e4misen ja maahantulokiellon osalta ja asia palautettiin hallinto-oikeudelle uudelleen k\u00e4sitelt\u00e4v\u00e4ksi. Korkein hallinto-oikeus ei ole milt\u00e4\u00e4n osin ratkaissut kysymyst\u00e4 asianosaisen oikeudesta saada tieto Suojelupoliisin lausuntoon liittyv\u00e4st\u00e4 selvityksest\u00e4, vaan t\u00e4m\u00e4 kysymys hallinto-oikeuden oli ratkaistava selvityksen saatuaan.<\/p>\n<h3>Euroopan ihmisoikeussopimus 13 artikla<\/h3>\n<h3>Perustuslaki 21 \u00a7<\/h3>\n<h3>Hallintolaink\u00e4ytt\u00f6laki 33 \u00a7<\/h3>\n<p>Euroopan ihmisoikeustuomioistuimen tuomio Regner v. Tsekin tasavalta, 19.9.2017<\/p>\n<p>Euroopan unionin tuomioistuimen tuomio C-300\/11, ZZ v. Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta, 4.6.2013<\/p>\n<h3>KHO 2007:48<\/h3>\n<h3>KKO 2016:20<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.finlex.fi\/en\/case-law\/supreme-administrative-court\/decision-summary\/2017\/6937\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Finlex open data, CC BY 4.0. Documentation open data verifiee le 2026-04-12 ; les endpoints judgment documentes renvoient 404 pour les types case-law exposes par le frontend, fallback actuel sur les pages publiques data.finlex.fi.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Migrationsverket hade avslagit ans\u00f6kan till den del det g\u00e4llde uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd f\u00f6r arbetstagare med h\u00e4nvisning till att s\u00f6kanden \u00e4ventyrade allm\u00e4n ordning och s\u00e4kerhet samt Finlands internationella f\u00f6rbindelser p\u00e5 det s\u00e4tt som avses i 36 \u00a7 1 momentet i utl\u00e4nningslagen. I Migrationsverkets beslut n\u00e4mndes att Skyddspolisen givit ett utl\u00e5tande i \u00e4rendet, enligt vilket s\u00f6kanden kunde anses utg\u00f6ra&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7740],"kji_court":[28668],"kji_chamber":[31727],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[29464,52865,17883,30744],"kji_language":[7746],"class_list":["post-804800","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-finlande","kji_court-cour-supreme-administrative-de-finlande","kji_chamber-sommaires","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-finlands","kji_keyword-ordning","kji_keyword-sakerhet","kji_keyword-sokanden","kji_language-multilingue"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.6 (Yoast SEO v27.6) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>KHO 29.12.2017\/6937 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-29-12-2017-6937-utlanningsarende\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"KHO 29.12.2017\/6937 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Migrationsverket hade avslagit ans\u00f6kan till den del det g\u00e4llde uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd f\u00f6r arbetstagare med h\u00e4nvisning till att s\u00f6kanden \u00e4ventyrade allm\u00e4n ordning och s\u00e4kerhet samt Finlands internationella f\u00f6rbindelser p\u00e5 det s\u00e4tt som avses i 36 \u00a7 1 momentet i utl\u00e4nningslagen. I Migrationsverkets beslut n\u00e4mndes att Skyddspolisen givit ett utl\u00e5tande i \u00e4rendet, enligt vilket s\u00f6kanden kunde anses utg\u00f6ra...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-29-12-2017-6937-utlanningsarende\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-29-12-2017-6937-utlanningsarende\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-29-12-2017-6937-utlanningsarende\\\/\",\"name\":\"KHO 29.12.2017\\\/6937 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-01T10:09:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-29-12-2017-6937-utlanningsarende\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-29-12-2017-6937-utlanningsarende\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-29-12-2017-6937-utlanningsarende\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"KHO 29.12.2017\\\/6937 &#8211; Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"KHO 29.12.2017\/6937 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-29-12-2017-6937-utlanningsarende\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"KHO 29.12.2017\/6937 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende","og_description":"Migrationsverket hade avslagit ans\u00f6kan till den del det g\u00e4llde uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd f\u00f6r arbetstagare med h\u00e4nvisning till att s\u00f6kanden \u00e4ventyrade allm\u00e4n ordning och s\u00e4kerhet samt Finlands internationella f\u00f6rbindelser p\u00e5 det s\u00e4tt som avses i 36 \u00a7 1 momentet i utl\u00e4nningslagen. I Migrationsverkets beslut n\u00e4mndes att Skyddspolisen givit ett utl\u00e5tande i \u00e4rendet, enligt vilket s\u00f6kanden kunde anses utg\u00f6ra...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-29-12-2017-6937-utlanningsarende\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"5 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-29-12-2017-6937-utlanningsarende\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-29-12-2017-6937-utlanningsarende\/","name":"KHO 29.12.2017\/6937 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-01T10:09:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-29-12-2017-6937-utlanningsarende\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-29-12-2017-6937-utlanningsarende\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-29-12-2017-6937-utlanningsarende\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"KHO 29.12.2017\/6937 &#8211; Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/804800","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=804800"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=804800"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=804800"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=804800"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=804800"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=804800"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=804800"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=804800"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}