{"id":804806,"date":"2026-05-01T12:09:55","date_gmt":"2026-05-01T10:09:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/kho-28-12-2017-6741-utlanningsarende\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T12:09:55","modified_gmt":"2026-05-01T10:09:55","slug":"kho-28-12-2017-6741-utlanningsarende","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-28-12-2017-6741-utlanningsarende\/","title":{"rendered":"KHO 28.12.2017\/6741 – Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Migrationsverket hade med samma beslut avslagit Etiopiska medborgaren A:s ans\u00f6kan om asyl och uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd samt uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd p\u00e5 grund av familjeband, om vilket ans\u00f6kts skilt. Migrationsverket hade dessutom beslutat att avvisa A till hans hemland Etiopien. Migrationsverket hade i sitt beslut ansett att A inte kunde beviljas uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd eftersom han inte hade uppvisat ett giltigt resedokument i samband med sin uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5ndsans\u00f6kan.<\/p>\n

H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen konstaterade att i samband med asylf\u00f6rfarandet kan avg\u00f6ras \u00e4ven beviljande av uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd som ans\u00f6kts p\u00e5 annan grund. Den i 94 \u00a7 3 momentet i utl\u00e4nningslagen stadgade skyldigheten att i samband med asylf\u00f6rfarandet pr\u00f6va och avg\u00f6ra beviljande av uppeh\u00e5llsr\u00e4tt \u00e4ven p\u00e5 andra grunder som framkommer g\u00e4ller uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5ndgrunder som h\u00e4nf\u00f6r sig till internationellt skydd. I ifr\u00e5gavarande fall var det inte fr\u00e5ga om detta, utan om en parallell uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5ndsans\u00f6kan och d\u00e4rf\u00f6r utgjorde i detta fall skillnaderna i kravet g\u00e4llande resedokument som en f\u00f6ruts\u00e4ttning f\u00f6r beviljande av uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd ett hinder f\u00f6r samtidig behandling av ans\u00f6kningarna.<\/p>\n

A:s uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5ndsans\u00f6kan p\u00e5 grund av familjeband hade varit sekund\u00e4r och dessutom bristf\u00e4llig, eftersom A inte hade uppvisat ett giltigt resedokument. Efter att A hade s\u00f6kt internationell skydd i Finland kunde det inte kr\u00e4vas att han under den tid asylans\u00f6kan \u00e4r anh\u00e4ngig v\u00e4nder sig till sitt hemland f\u00f6r att f\u00e5 det resedokument som kr\u00e4vs f\u00f6r beviljande av uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd p\u00e5 grund av familjeband. Eftersom behovet att uppvisa ett resedokument var beroende av utg\u00e5ngen i asyl\u00e4rendet, kunde behovet att komplettera uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5ndsans\u00f6kan p\u00e5 grund av familjeband inte bed\u00f6mas f\u00f6re asyl\u00e4rendet avgjorts. Migrationsverket borde inte ha avgjort A:s uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5ndsans\u00f6kan p\u00e5 grund av familjeband medan asyl\u00e4rendet var anh\u00e4ngigt och inte heller i det sambandet besluta om att avvisa A.<\/p>\n

H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen upph\u00e4vde Migrationsverkets och f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolens beslut till den del det g\u00e4llde uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd p\u00e5 grund av familjeband och avvisning och \u00e5tervisade \u00e4rendet till Migrationsverket f\u00f6r ny pr\u00f6vning. I och med att beslutet som g\u00e4llde asyl vunnit laga kraft skulle A beredas tillf\u00e4lle att uppvisa ett giltigt resedokument, vilket \u00e4r en f\u00f6ruts\u00e4ttning f\u00f6r beviljande av uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd p\u00e5 grund av familjeband, eller en tillf\u00f6rlitlig utredning om att han av sk\u00e4l som inte beror p\u00e5 honom sj\u00e4lv inte kan f\u00e5 ett av hans hemland beviljat resedokument.<\/p>\n

Utl\u00e4nningslagen 35 \u00a7<\/h3>\n

Se \u00e4ven HFD 2014:24 jmf HFD 19.8.2008\/1987<\/p>\n

\u00c4rendet har avgjorts av justitier\u00e5den Janne Aer, Petri Helander, Tuomas Kuokkanen, Mikko Puumalainen och Pekka Aalto. F\u00f6redragande Jenny Rebold.<\/p>\n

Maahanmuuttovirasto oli samalla p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksell\u00e4 hyl\u00e4nnyt Etiopian kansalaisen A:n turvapaikkaa ja oleskelulupaa sek\u00e4 erikseen perhesiteen perusteella haettua oleskelulupaa koskevat hakemukset. Maahanmuuttovirasto oli lis\u00e4ksi p\u00e4\u00e4tt\u00e4nyt k\u00e4\u00e4nnytt\u00e4\u00e4 A:n kotimaahansa Etiopiaan. Maahanmuuttovirasto oli p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6ksess\u00e4\u00e4n katsonut, ett\u00e4 A:lle ei voitu my\u00f6nt\u00e4\u00e4 oleskelulupaa, sill\u00e4 h\u00e4nell\u00e4 ei ollut esitt\u00e4\u00e4 voimassaolevaa passia oleskelulupahakemuksensa yhteydess\u00e4.<\/p>\n

Korkein hallinto-oikeus totesi, ett\u00e4 turvapaikkamenettelyn yhteydess\u00e4 voidaan ratkaista hakijan muulla perusteella tekem\u00e4 oleskelulupahakemus. Ulkomaalaislain 94 \u00a7:n 3 momentissa s\u00e4\u00e4detty velvollisuus tutkia ja ratkaista turvapaikkamenettelyn yhteydess\u00e4 oleskeluluvan my\u00f6nt\u00e4minen my\u00f6s muulla perusteella koskee kansainv\u00e4liseen suojeluun liittyvi\u00e4 oleskelulupaperusteita. T\u00e4ss\u00e4 tapauksessa t\u00e4st\u00e4 ei ollut kysymys, vaan rinnakkaisesta oleskelulupahakemuksesta, jolloin matkustusasiakirjaan liittyv\u00e4t erot oleskeluluvan my\u00f6nt\u00e4misedellytyksiss\u00e4 olivat esteen\u00e4 hakemusten yhdess\u00e4 k\u00e4sittelylle.<\/p>\n

A:n perhesiteen perusteella tehty hakemus oli ollut paitsi toissijainen, niin my\u00f6s puutteellinen, koska A ei ollut esitt\u00e4nyt voimassa olevaa matkustusasiakirjaa. H\u00e4nen haettuaan kansainv\u00e4list\u00e4 suojelua Suomesta ei ollut voitu edellytt\u00e4\u00e4, ett\u00e4 h\u00e4n turvapaikkahakemuksensa vireill\u00e4 ollessa k\u00e4\u00e4ntyy kotivaltionsa puoleen saadakseen perhesiteeseen perustuvan oleskeluluvan my\u00f6nt\u00e4miseksi vaadittavan matkustusasiakirjan. Koska matkustusasiakirjan esitt\u00e4misen tarve riippui turvapaikkahakemuksen lopputuloksesta, perhesiteen perusteella tehdyn hakemuksen t\u00e4ydent\u00e4misen tarpeellisuutta ei ollut voitu arvioida ennen turvapaikkahakemuksen ratkaisemista. Maahanmuuttoviraston ei olisi tullut ottaa ratkaistavakseen A:n perhesiteen perusteella my\u00f6nnett\u00e4v\u00e4\u00e4 oleskelulupaa koskevaa asiaa A:n kansainv\u00e4list\u00e4 suojelua koskevan asian ollessa edelleen vireill\u00e4 eik\u00e4 tehd\u00e4 siin\u00e4 yhteydess\u00e4 ratkaisua A:n k\u00e4\u00e4nnytt\u00e4misest\u00e4.<\/p>\n

Korkein hallinto-oikeus kumosi Maahanmuuttoviraston ja hallinto-oikeuden p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6kset perhesiteen perusteella my\u00f6nnett\u00e4v\u00e4\u00e4 oleskelulupaa ja k\u00e4\u00e4nnytt\u00e4mist\u00e4 koskevilta osin ja palautti asian Maahanmuuttoviraston uudelleen k\u00e4sitelt\u00e4v\u00e4ksi. A:lle oli, kansainv\u00e4list\u00e4 suojelua koskevan asian tultua lainvoimaisesti ratkaistuksi, varattava tilaisuus esitt\u00e4\u00e4 perhesiteen perusteella my\u00f6nnett\u00e4v\u00e4n oleskeluluvan edellytyksen\u00e4 oleva voimassaoleva matkustusasiakirja tai luotettava selvitys siit\u00e4, ett\u00e4 h\u00e4n ei voi itsest\u00e4\u00e4n riippumattomista syist\u00e4 saada kotivaltionsa my\u00f6nt\u00e4m\u00e4\u00e4 matkustusasiakirjaa.<\/p>\n

Ulkomaalaislaki 35 \u00a7<\/h3>\n

Ks. my\u00f6s KHO 2014:24 vrt KHO 19.8.2008\/1987<\/p>\n

Asian ovat ratkaisseet oikeusneuvokset Janne Aer, Petri Helander, Tuomas Kuokkanen, Mikko Puumalainen ja Pekka Aalto. Asian esittelij\u00e4 Jenny Rebold.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Finlex open data, CC BY 4.0. Documentation open data verifiee le 2026-04-12 ; les endpoints judgment documentes renvoient 404 pour les types case-law exposes par le frontend, fallback actuel sur les pages publiques data.finlex.fi.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Migrationsverket hade med samma beslut avslagit Etiopiska medborgaren A:s ans\u00f6kan om asyl och uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd samt uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd p\u00e5 grund av familjeband, om vilket ans\u00f6kts skilt. Migrationsverket hade dessutom beslutat att avvisa A till hans hemland Etiopien. Migrationsverket hade i sitt beslut ansett att A inte kunde beviljas uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd eftersom han inte hade uppvisat ett giltigt resedokument…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7740],"kji_court":[28668],"kji_chamber":[31727],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[15610,28704,28706],"kji_language":[7746],"class_list":["post-804806","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-finlande","kji_court-cour-supreme-administrative-de-finlande","kji_chamber-sommaires","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-beslut","kji_keyword-migrationsverket","kji_keyword-uppehallstillstand","kji_language-multilingue"],"yoast_head":"\nKHO 28.12.2017\/6741 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-28-12-2017-6741-utlanningsarende\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"KHO 28.12.2017\/6741 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Migrationsverket hade med samma beslut avslagit Etiopiska medborgaren A:s ans\u00f6kan om asyl och uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd samt uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd p\u00e5 grund av familjeband, om vilket ans\u00f6kts skilt. Migrationsverket hade dessutom beslutat att avvisa A till hans hemland Etiopien. Migrationsverket hade i sitt beslut ansett att A inte kunde beviljas uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd eftersom han inte hade uppvisat ett giltigt resedokument...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-28-12-2017-6741-utlanningsarende\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-28-12-2017-6741-utlanningsarende\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-28-12-2017-6741-utlanningsarende\\\/\",\"name\":\"KHO 28.12.2017\\\/6741 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-01T10:09:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-28-12-2017-6741-utlanningsarende\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-28-12-2017-6741-utlanningsarende\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-28-12-2017-6741-utlanningsarende\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"KHO 28.12.2017\\\/6741 – Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"KHO 28.12.2017\/6741 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-28-12-2017-6741-utlanningsarende\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"KHO 28.12.2017\/6741 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende","og_description":"Migrationsverket hade med samma beslut avslagit Etiopiska medborgaren A:s ans\u00f6kan om asyl och uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd samt uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd p\u00e5 grund av familjeband, om vilket ans\u00f6kts skilt. Migrationsverket hade dessutom beslutat att avvisa A till hans hemland Etiopien. Migrationsverket hade i sitt beslut ansett att A inte kunde beviljas uppeh\u00e5llstillst\u00e5nd eftersom han inte hade uppvisat ett giltigt resedokument...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-28-12-2017-6741-utlanningsarende\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"4 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-28-12-2017-6741-utlanningsarende\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-28-12-2017-6741-utlanningsarende\/","name":"KHO 28.12.2017\/6741 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-01T10:09:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-28-12-2017-6741-utlanningsarende\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-28-12-2017-6741-utlanningsarende\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-28-12-2017-6741-utlanningsarende\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"KHO 28.12.2017\/6741 – Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/804806","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=804806"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=804806"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=804806"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=804806"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=804806"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=804806"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=804806"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=804806"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}