{"id":806521,"date":"2026-05-01T15:32:41","date_gmt":"2026-05-01T13:32:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-7-decembre-2017-n-1207-3884\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T15:32:44","modified_gmt":"2026-05-01T13:32:44","slug":"cour-de-cassation-7-decembre-2017-n-1207-3884","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-7-decembre-2017-n-1207-3884\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation, 7 d\u00e9cembre 2017, n\u00b0 1207-3884"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>N\u00b0 88 \/ 2017 du 07.12.2017.<\/p>\n<p>Num\u00e9ro 3884 du registre.<\/p>\n<p>Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, sept d\u00e9cembre deux mille dix-sept.<\/p>\n<p>Composition:<\/p>\n<p>Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Nico EDON, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Carlo HEYARD, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Yola SCHMIT, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019appel, Serge WAGNER, premier avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, Viviane PROBST, greffier \u00e0 la Cour.<\/p>\n<p>Entre:<\/p>\n<p>X, demeurant \u00e0 (\u2026),<\/p>\n<p>demandeur en cassation,<\/p>\n<p>comparant par Ma\u00eetre Alain GROSS, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, demeurant \u00e0 Luxembourg, en l\u2019\u00e9tude duquel domicile est \u00e9lu,<\/p>\n<p>et:<\/p>\n<p>Y, demeurant \u00e0 (\u2026),<\/p>\n<p>d\u00e9fenderes se en cassation.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>LA COUR DE CASSATION :<\/p>\n<p>Vu l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9, num\u00e9ro 222\/16, rendu le 2 1 d\u00e9cembre 2016 sous le num\u00e9ro 43104 du r\u00f4le par la Cour d\u2019appel du Grand-Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, premi\u00e8re chambre, si\u00e9geant en mati\u00e8re civile ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu le m\u00e9moire en cassation signifi\u00e9 le 2 mars 2017 par X \u00e0 Y, d\u00e9pos\u00e9 le 3 mars 2017 au greffe de la Cour ;<\/p>\n<p>2 Sur le rapport du conseiller Carlo HEYARD et sur les conclusions du premier avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Simone FLAMMANG ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur les faits :<\/p>\n<p>Attendu, selon l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9, que le tribunal d\u2019arrondissement de Luxembourg avait rejet\u00e9 la demande reconventionnelle en divorce de X dirig\u00e9e contre son \u00e9pouse Y pour abandon du domicile conjugal ; que la Cour d\u2019appel a confirm\u00e9 le jugement entrepris ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur le premier moyen de cassation :<\/p>\n<p>tir\u00e9 \u00ab de la violation de l\u2019article 249 alin\u00e9a 1 er du Nouveau code de proc\u00e9dure civile, \u00e0 savoir le d\u00e9faut de motivation du juge d\u2019appel en ce qu\u2019il a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 justifi\u00e9 le d\u00e9part du domicile conjugal de la dame Y<\/p>\n<p>au motif que selon la Cour d\u2019appel, la dame Y verse au d\u00e9bat une attestation testimoniale de A) qui d\u00e9crit &lt;&lt; la situation p\u00e9nible dans laquelle se trouvait l\u2019\u00e9pouse avant de quitter le domicile conjugal &gt;&gt;. \u00bb ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu qu\u2019aux termes de l\u2019article 10 de la loi modifi\u00e9e du 18 f\u00e9vrier 1885 sur les pourvois et la proc\u00e9dure en cassation chaque moyen ou chaque branche doit pr\u00e9ciser, sous peine d\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9, en quoi la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e encourt le reproche all\u00e9gu\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que le moyen manque de la pr\u00e9cision requise en ce qu\u2019il omet d\u2019indiquer en quoi la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e serait entach\u00e9e d\u2019un d\u00e9faut de motivation ;<\/p>\n<p>Qu\u2019il en suit que le moyen est irrecevable ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur le second moyen de cassation :<\/p>\n<p>tir\u00e9 \u00ab de la violation de l\u2019article 402 alin\u00e9a 1 er du Nouveau code de proc\u00e9dure civile en ce que les juges d\u2019appel ont retenu que :<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; La dame Claudette Jos\u00e9phine Y verse au d\u00e9bat une attestation testimoniale de la dame A) qui retranscrit des faits que la dame Y a rapport\u00e9s \u00e0 cette derni\u00e8re \u00e0 savoir &lt;&lt; la situation p\u00e9nible dans laquelle se trouvait l\u2019\u00e9pouse avant de quitter le domicile conjugal &gt;&gt;. &#8211; L\u2019intim\u00e9e a d\u00e8s lors \u00e9tabli que son d\u00e9part \u00e9tait justifi\u00e9 si bien que la pr\u00e9somption du caract\u00e8re fautif et injurieux du non- respect de l\u2019obligation de cohabitation est en l\u2019esp\u00e8ce \u00e9cart\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n<p>Au motif que les seules d\u00e9clarations de la dame A) en ce que la situation p\u00e9nible dans laquelle la dame Y se trouvait valait renversement de la pr\u00e9somption du caract\u00e8re fautif et injurieux du non- respect de l\u2019obligation, les juges d\u2019appel ont viol\u00e9 les termes de l\u2019article 402 alin\u00e9a 1 er du Nouveau code de proc\u00e9dure civile. \u00bb ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que sous le couvert du grief de la violation de la dispos ition vis\u00e9e au moyen, celui-ci ne tend qu\u2019\u00e0 remettre en cause l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souveraine, par les juges du fond, de la valeur probante d\u2019une attestation testimoniale, appr\u00e9ciation qui \u00e9chappe au contr\u00f4le de la Cour de cassation ;<\/p>\n<p>Qu\u2019il en suit que le moyen ne saurait \u00eatre accueilli ;<\/p>\n<p>Par ces motifs,<\/p>\n<p>rejette le pourvoi ;<\/p>\n<p>condamne le demandeur en cassation aux d\u00e9pens de l\u2019instance en cassation.<\/p>\n<p>La lecture du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite en la susdite audience publique par Monsieur le pr\u00e9sident Jean -Claude WIWINIUS, en pr\u00e9sence de Monsieur Serge WAGNER, premier avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, et de Madame Viviane PROBST, greffier \u00e0 la Cour.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/data.public.lu\/fr\/datasets\/cour-de-cassation\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/download.data.public.lu\/resources\/cour-de-cassation\/20240806-145645\/20171207-3884a-accessible.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Licence CC BY-ND 4.0 (Administration judiciaire, data.public.lu). Republication autorisee avec attribution, sans modification editoriale du texte integral.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>N\u00b0 88 \/ 2017 du 07.12.2017. Num\u00e9ro 3884 du registre. Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, sept d\u00e9cembre deux mille dix-sept. Composition: Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Nico\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[8418],"kji_court":[8423],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8424,8464],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-806521","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-luxembourg","kji_court-cour-de-cassation","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-decembre","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour de cassation, 7 d\u00e9cembre 2017, n\u00b0 1207-3884 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-7-decembre-2017-n-1207-3884\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation, 7 d\u00e9cembre 2017, n\u00b0 1207-3884\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"N\u00b0 88 \/ 2017 du 07.12.2017. Num\u00e9ro 3884 du registre. Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, sept d\u00e9cembre deux mille dix-sept. Composition: Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Nico\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-7-decembre-2017-n-1207-3884\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-01T13:32:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-7-decembre-2017-n-1207-3884\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-7-decembre-2017-n-1207-3884\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 7 d\u00e9cembre 2017, n\u00b0 1207-3884 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-01T13:32:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-01T13:32:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-7-decembre-2017-n-1207-3884\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-7-decembre-2017-n-1207-3884\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-7-decembre-2017-n-1207-3884\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 7 d\u00e9cembre 2017, n\u00b0 1207-3884\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation, 7 d\u00e9cembre 2017, n\u00b0 1207-3884 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-7-decembre-2017-n-1207-3884\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation, 7 d\u00e9cembre 2017, n\u00b0 1207-3884","og_description":"N\u00b0 88 \/ 2017 du 07.12.2017. Num\u00e9ro 3884 du registre. Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, sept d\u00e9cembre deux mille dix-sept. Composition: Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Nico\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-7-decembre-2017-n-1207-3884\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-05-01T13:32:44+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"4 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-7-decembre-2017-n-1207-3884\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-7-decembre-2017-n-1207-3884\/","name":"Cour de cassation, 7 d\u00e9cembre 2017, n\u00b0 1207-3884 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-01T13:32:41+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-01T13:32:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-7-decembre-2017-n-1207-3884\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-7-decembre-2017-n-1207-3884\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-7-decembre-2017-n-1207-3884\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation, 7 d\u00e9cembre 2017, n\u00b0 1207-3884"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/806521","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=806521"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=806521"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=806521"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=806521"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=806521"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=806521"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=806521"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=806521"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}