{"id":809891,"date":"2026-05-01T20:07:40","date_gmt":"2026-05-01T18:07:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-9-novembre-2017-n-1109-3876\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T20:07:45","modified_gmt":"2026-05-01T18:07:45","slug":"cour-de-cassation-9-novembre-2017-n-1109-3876","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-9-novembre-2017-n-1109-3876\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation, 9 novembre 2017, n\u00b0 1109-3876"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>N\u00b0 60 \/ 2017 p\u00e9nal. du 09.11.2017. Not. 23469\/ 15\/CD Num\u00e9ro 3876 du registre.<\/p>\n<p>La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, form\u00e9e conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi du 7 mars 1980 sur l&#039;organisation judiciaire, a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, neuf novembre deux mille dix -sept,<\/p>\n<p>sur le pourvoi de :<\/p>\n<p>1) X, n\u00e9 le (\u2026) \u00e0 (\u2026 ), demeurant \u00e0 (\u2026),<\/p>\n<p>2) la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e SOC1) , \u00e9tablie et ayant son si\u00e8ge social \u00e0 (\u2026), repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par son g\u00e9rant, inscrite au registre de commerce et des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s sous le num\u00e9ro (\u2026),<\/p>\n<p>demandeurs en cassation,<\/p>\n<p>comparant par Ma\u00eetre Jean-Jacques LORANG, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, demeurant \u00e0 Luxembourg, en l\u2019\u00e9tude duquel domicile est \u00e9lu,<\/p>\n<p>en pr\u00e9sence du Minist\u00e8re p ublic,<\/p>\n<p>l\u2019arr\u00eat qui suit :<\/p>\n<p>=======================================================<\/p>\n<p>LA COUR DE CASSATION :<\/p>\n<p>Vu l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 rendu le 4 janvier 2017 sous le num\u00e9ro 09\/17 Ch.c.C. par la Chambre du conseil de la Cour d\u2019appel du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu le pourvoi en cassation form\u00e9 par Ma\u00eetre Jean -Jacques LORANG, pour et au nom de X et de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SOC1) s.\u00e0 r.l., suivant d\u00e9claration du 9 f\u00e9vrier 2017 au greffe de la Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu le m\u00e9moire en cassation d\u00e9pos\u00e9 le 9 mars 2017 au greffe de la Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur le rapport du conseiller Nico EDON et sur les conclusions du premier avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral John PETRY ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur la recevabilit\u00e9 du pourvoi qui est contest\u00e9e :<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 a statu\u00e9 sur le recours des actuelles parties demanderesses en cassation contre une d\u00e9cision de la juridiction d\u2019instruction du premier degr\u00e9 qui avait dit irrecevable une demande en nullit\u00e9 dirig\u00e9e contre une d\u00e9cision du juge d\u2019instruction ayant refus\u00e9 aux actuelles parties demanderesses en cassation l\u2019acc\u00e8s au dossier instruit sur plainte avec constitution de partie civile visant les actuelles parties demanderesses en cassation, sans que celles-ci aient d\u2019ores et d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e9t\u00e9 inculp\u00e9es ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que le pourvoi en cassation est une voie de recours extraordinaire ;<\/p>\n<p>Qu\u2019en vertu de l\u2019article 2 de la loi modifi\u00e9e du 18 f\u00e9vrier 1885, les cas d\u2019annulation ou de cassation en mati\u00e8re p\u00e9nale sont r\u00e9gl\u00e9s par le Code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu qu\u2019aux termes de l\u2019article 407 du Code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale, les arr\u00eats et jugements rendus en dernier ressort en mati\u00e8re criminelle, correctionnelle ou de police peuvent \u00eatre annul\u00e9s en cas de violation de la loi sur le pourvoi en cassation form\u00e9 par le minist\u00e8re public, le pr\u00e9venu ou la partie civile, le tout sans pr\u00e9judice des dispositions de l\u2019article 416 du m\u00eame code r\u00e9glant le recours en cassation contre les arr\u00eats pr\u00e9paratoires et d\u2019instruction et les jugements en dernier ressort de cette qualit\u00e9, qui n\u2019ouvre le recours en cassation en principe qu\u2019apr\u00e8s l\u2019arr\u00eat ou le jugement d\u00e9finitif ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que le pourvoi form\u00e9 par X et par la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SOC1) s. \u00e0 r.l. n\u2019\u00e9mane ni d\u2019une partie pr\u00e9venue ni d\u2019une partie civile ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 n\u2019\u00e9puise pas non plus la saisine des juridictions judiciaires \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9gard des parties demanderesses en cassation ;<\/p>\n<p>Qu\u2019il en suit que le pourvoi est irrecevable ;<\/p>\n<p>Par ces motifs,<\/p>\n<p>d\u00e9clare le pourvoi irrecevable ;<\/p>\n<p>condamne les parties demanderesses en cassation aux frais de l\u2019instance en cassation, ceux expos\u00e9s par le minist\u00e8re public \u00e9tant liquid\u00e9s \u00e0 2,50 euros<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi jug\u00e9 par la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg en son audience publique du jeudi, neuf novembre deux mille dix-sept, \u00e0 la Cit\u00e9 Judiciaire, B\u00e2timent CR, Plateau du St. Esprit, compos\u00e9e de :<\/p>\n<p>3 Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Nico EDON, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Carlo HEYARD, c onseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Marc WAGNER, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019appel,<\/p>\n<p>qui ont sign\u00e9 le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat avec le greffier Viviane PROBST.<\/p>\n<p>La lecture du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite en la susdite audience publique par Monsieur le pr\u00e9sident Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, en pr\u00e9sence de Madame Monique SCHMITZ, avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, et de Madame Viviane PROBST, greffier \u00e0 la Cour.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/data.public.lu\/fr\/datasets\/cour-de-cassation\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/download.data.public.lu\/resources\/cour-de-cassation\/20240806-145536\/20171109-3876a-accessible.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Licence CC BY-ND 4.0 (Administration judiciaire, data.public.lu). Republication autorisee avec attribution, sans modification editoriale du texte integral.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>N\u00b0 60 \/ 2017 p\u00e9nal. du 09.11.2017. Not. 23469\/ 15\/CD Num\u00e9ro 3876 du registre. La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, form\u00e9e conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi du 7 mars 1980 sur l&#8217;organisation judiciaire, a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, neuf novembre\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[8418],"kji_court":[8423],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8424,8576,8425],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-809891","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-luxembourg","kji_court-cour-de-cassation","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-novembre","kji_keyword-penal","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour de cassation, 9 novembre 2017, n\u00b0 1109-3876 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-9-novembre-2017-n-1109-3876\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation, 9 novembre 2017, n\u00b0 1109-3876\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"N\u00b0 60 \/ 2017 p\u00e9nal. du 09.11.2017. Not. 23469\/ 15\/CD Num\u00e9ro 3876 du registre. La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, form\u00e9e conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi du 7 mars 1980 sur l&#039;organisation judiciaire, a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, neuf novembre\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-9-novembre-2017-n-1109-3876\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-01T18:07:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-9-novembre-2017-n-1109-3876\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-9-novembre-2017-n-1109-3876\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 9 novembre 2017, n\u00b0 1109-3876 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-01T18:07:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-01T18:07:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-9-novembre-2017-n-1109-3876\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-9-novembre-2017-n-1109-3876\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-9-novembre-2017-n-1109-3876\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 9 novembre 2017, n\u00b0 1109-3876\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation, 9 novembre 2017, n\u00b0 1109-3876 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-9-novembre-2017-n-1109-3876\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation, 9 novembre 2017, n\u00b0 1109-3876","og_description":"N\u00b0 60 \/ 2017 p\u00e9nal. du 09.11.2017. Not. 23469\/ 15\/CD Num\u00e9ro 3876 du registre. La Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg, form\u00e9e conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi du 7 mars 1980 sur l'organisation judiciaire, a rendu en son audience publique du jeudi, neuf novembre\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-9-novembre-2017-n-1109-3876\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-05-01T18:07:45+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"4 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-9-novembre-2017-n-1109-3876\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-9-novembre-2017-n-1109-3876\/","name":"Cour de cassation, 9 novembre 2017, n\u00b0 1109-3876 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-01T18:07:40+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-01T18:07:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-9-novembre-2017-n-1109-3876\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-9-novembre-2017-n-1109-3876\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-9-novembre-2017-n-1109-3876\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation, 9 novembre 2017, n\u00b0 1109-3876"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/809891","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=809891"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=809891"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=809891"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=809891"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=809891"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=809891"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=809891"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=809891"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}