{"id":810558,"date":"2026-05-01T22:05:46","date_gmt":"2026-05-01T20:05:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/kho-25-10-2017-5348-patent\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T22:05:46","modified_gmt":"2026-05-01T20:05:46","slug":"kho-25-10-2017-5348-patent","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-25-10-2017-5348-patent\/","title":{"rendered":"KHO 25.10.2017\/5348 – Patent"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Patent- och registerstyrelsen och marknadsdomstolen hade ansett att beskrivningen av ett patent som g\u00e4llde pulsbreddsmodulering av en frekvenstransformator var tillr\u00e4ckligt tydlig och att uppfinningen innehade nyhet och uppfinningsh\u00f6jd i f\u00f6rh\u00e5llande till teknikens f\u00f6retedda st\u00e5ndpunkt. Inv\u00e4ndaren, som \u00f6verklagat marknadsdomstolens beslut, hade anf\u00f6rt att fackmannens slutledningsf\u00f6rm\u00e5ga skulle anses ligga p\u00e5 samma niv\u00e5, b\u00e5de n\u00e4r man bed\u00f6mde beskrivningens tydlighet och n\u00e4r man bed\u00f6mde uppfinningsh\u00f6jden.<\/p>\n

H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen konstaterade att bed\u00f6mningen av om uppfinningen i en patentpublikation hade beskrivits s\u00e5 tydligt att en fackman med ledning av den kunde ut\u00f6va uppfinningen var en annan \u00e4n bed\u00f6mningen av huruvida uppfinningen var s\u00e5 uppenbar f\u00f6r en fackman p\u00e5 omr\u00e5det att den inte uppfyllde kravet p\u00e5 v\u00e4sentlig skillnad eller uppfinningsh\u00f6jd.<\/p>\n

En fackman p\u00e5 omr\u00e5det som l\u00e4ste en patentpublikation bekantade sig med en dokumenterad l\u00f6sning, vars k\u00e4nnetecken han inte sj\u00e4lv beh\u00f6vde finna p\u00e5. Det var d\u00e5 fr\u00e5ga om att till\u00e4mpa den kunskap som framgick av publikationen f\u00f6r att ut\u00f6va l\u00f6sningen i praktiken.<\/p>\n

Vid bed\u00f6mningen av uppfinningsh\u00f6jden utgick man d\u00e4remot ifr\u00e5n att den uppfinning som bed\u00f6mdes inte ingick i teknikens f\u00f6r fackmannen bekanta st\u00e5ndpunkt. Fackmannen p\u00e5 omr\u00e5det j\u00e4mst\u00e4lldes i detta sammanhang med uppfinnaren. Uppfinnaren hade ingen f\u00e4rdig dokumentation eller modell att till\u00e4mpa, utan fr\u00e5gan g\u00e4llde huruvida han p\u00e5 eget initiativ, med sin yrkesskicklighet och enbart teknikens fr\u00e5n tidigare k\u00e4nda st\u00e5ndpunkt som grund skulle komma fram till den l\u00f6sning som presenterades i patentpublikationen.<\/p>\n

Fackmannen p\u00e5 omr\u00e5det antogs s\u00e5ledes i vartdera fallet ha samma grundkunskaper och -skicklighet, men eftersom det var v\u00e4sentligt enklare att p\u00e5 basis av allm\u00e4nkunskap till\u00e4mpa en l\u00f6sning som beskrivits i en publikation \u00e4n att utveckla en ny uppfinning, kunde uppfinningen anses vara tillr\u00e4ckligt tydligt beskriven \u00e4ven om alla dess detaljer inte skulle ha redovisats.<\/p>\n

Det fanns inte sk\u00e4l att upph\u00e4va patentet p\u00e5 den grunden att patentbeskrivningen inte skulle ha varit tillr\u00e4ckligt tydlig.<\/p>\n

Patentlagen 2 \u00a7 1 mom., 8 \u00a7 2 mom. och 25 \u00a7 1 mom. 1\u20122 punkten<\/p>\n

\u00c4rendet har avgjorts av president Pekka Vihervuori, justitier\u00e5den Niilo J\u00e4\u00e4skinen, Alice Guimaraes-Purokoski, Outi Suviranta och Anne Nenonen samt \u00f6veringenj\u00f6rsr\u00e5den Kenneth Holmberg och Raimo Sepponen. F\u00f6redragande Kristina Bj\u00f6rkvall.<\/p>\n

Korkein hallinto-oikeus totesi, ett\u00e4 sen arviointi, onko keksint\u00f6 esitetty patenttijulkaisussa niin selv\u00e4sti, ett\u00e4 alan ammattilainen voi sen perusteella k\u00e4ytt\u00e4\u00e4 keksint\u00f6\u00e4, oli teht\u00e4v\u00e4 eri tavalla kuin sen arviointi, oliko keksint\u00f6 alan ammattilaiselle niin ilmeinen, ett\u00e4 se ei t\u00e4ytt\u00e4nyt patentoinnille asetettua olennaisen eron eli keksinn\u00f6llisyyden edellytyst\u00e4.<\/p>\n

Alan ammattilainen tutustui patenttijulkaisua lukiessaan dokumentoituun ratkaisuun, jonka piirteit\u00e4 h\u00e4nen ei tarvitse itse keksi\u00e4. Kysymys oli t\u00e4ll\u00f6in julkaisusta ilmenevien tietojen soveltamisesta k\u00e4yt\u00e4nn\u00f6n ratkaisun toteuttamiseksi.<\/p>\n

Keksinn\u00f6llisyysarviointia suoritettaessa l\u00e4hdettiin puolestaan siit\u00e4, ett\u00e4 arvioinnin kohteena oleva keksint\u00f6 ei kuulunut alan ammattilaisen tunteman tekniikan tasoon. Alan ammattilainen rinnastui t\u00e4ll\u00f6in keksij\u00e4\u00e4n. Keksij\u00e4ll\u00e4 ei ollut valmista dokumentaatiota tai mallia sovellettavaksi, vaan kysymys oli siit\u00e4, p\u00e4\u00e4tyisik\u00f6 h\u00e4n oma-aloitteisesti, oman ammattitaitonsa ja pelk\u00e4st\u00e4\u00e4n entuudestaan tuntemansa tekniikan tason varassa patenttijulkaisun mukaiseen ratkaisuun.<\/p>\n

Alan ammattilaisella oletettiin siten olevan kummassakin tapauksessa samat perustiedot ja -taidot, mutta koska patenttijulkaisussa kuvatun ratkaisun soveltaminen yleistietojen pohjalta oli olennaisesti helpompaa kuin uuden keksinn\u00f6n kehitt\u00e4minen, keksint\u00f6\u00e4 voitiin pit\u00e4\u00e4 riitt\u00e4v\u00e4n selv\u00e4sti kuvattuna, vaikka keksinn\u00f6n kaikkia yksityiskohtia ei olisi selostettu.<\/p>\n

Kysymyksess\u00e4 olevaa patenttia ei ollut perusteita kumota sill\u00e4 perusteella, ett\u00e4 patentin selitys ei olisi ollut riitt\u00e4v\u00e4n selv\u00e4.<\/p>\n

Patenttilaki 2 \u00a7 1 momentti, 8 \u00a7 2 momentti ja 25 \u00a7 1 momentti 1\u20122 kohta<\/h3>\n

Asian ovat ratkaisseet presidentti Pekka Vihervuori, oikeusneuvokset Niilo J\u00e4\u00e4skinen, Alice Guimaraes-Purokoski, Outi Suviranta ja Anne Nenonen sek\u00e4 yli-insin\u00f6\u00f6rineuvokset Kenneth Holmberg ja Raimo Sepponen. Asian esittelij\u00e4 Kristina Bj\u00f6rkvall.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Finlex open data, CC BY 4.0. Documentation open data verifiee le 2026-04-12 ; les endpoints judgment documentes renvoient 404 pour les types case-law exposes par le frontend, fallback actuel sur les pages publiques data.finlex.fi.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Patent- och registerstyrelsen och marknadsdomstolen hade ansett att beskrivningen av ett patent som g\u00e4llde pulsbreddsmodulering av en frekvenstransformator var tillr\u00e4ckligt tydlig och att uppfinningen innehade nyhet och uppfinningsh\u00f6jd i f\u00f6rh\u00e5llande till teknikens f\u00f6retedda st\u00e5ndpunkt. Inv\u00e4ndaren, som \u00f6verklagat marknadsdomstolens beslut, hade anf\u00f6rt att fackmannens slutledningsf\u00f6rm\u00e5ga skulle anses ligga p\u00e5 samma niv\u00e5, b\u00e5de n\u00e4r man bed\u00f6mde beskrivningens…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7740],"kji_court":[28668],"kji_chamber":[31727],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[20869,54731,16391,13131,35739],"kji_language":[7746],"class_list":["post-810558","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-finlande","kji_court-cour-supreme-administrative-de-finlande","kji_chamber-sommaires","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-ansett","kji_keyword-bedomde","kji_keyword-marknadsdomstolen","kji_keyword-patent","kji_keyword-registerstyrelsen","kji_language-multilingue"],"yoast_head":"\nKHO 25.10.2017\/5348 - Patent - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-25-10-2017-5348-patent\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"KHO 25.10.2017\/5348 - Patent\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patent- och registerstyrelsen och marknadsdomstolen hade ansett att beskrivningen av ett patent som g\u00e4llde pulsbreddsmodulering av en frekvenstransformator var tillr\u00e4ckligt tydlig och att uppfinningen innehade nyhet och uppfinningsh\u00f6jd i f\u00f6rh\u00e5llande till teknikens f\u00f6retedda st\u00e5ndpunkt. Inv\u00e4ndaren, som \u00f6verklagat marknadsdomstolens beslut, hade anf\u00f6rt att fackmannens slutledningsf\u00f6rm\u00e5ga skulle anses ligga p\u00e5 samma niv\u00e5, b\u00e5de n\u00e4r man bed\u00f6mde beskrivningens...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-25-10-2017-5348-patent\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-25-10-2017-5348-patent\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-25-10-2017-5348-patent\\\/\",\"name\":\"KHO 25.10.2017\\\/5348 - Patent - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-01T20:05:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-25-10-2017-5348-patent\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-25-10-2017-5348-patent\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-25-10-2017-5348-patent\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"KHO 25.10.2017\\\/5348 – Patent\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"KHO 25.10.2017\/5348 - Patent - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-25-10-2017-5348-patent\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"KHO 25.10.2017\/5348 - Patent","og_description":"Patent- och registerstyrelsen och marknadsdomstolen hade ansett att beskrivningen av ett patent som g\u00e4llde pulsbreddsmodulering av en frekvenstransformator var tillr\u00e4ckligt tydlig och att uppfinningen innehade nyhet och uppfinningsh\u00f6jd i f\u00f6rh\u00e5llande till teknikens f\u00f6retedda st\u00e5ndpunkt. Inv\u00e4ndaren, som \u00f6verklagat marknadsdomstolens beslut, hade anf\u00f6rt att fackmannens slutledningsf\u00f6rm\u00e5ga skulle anses ligga p\u00e5 samma niv\u00e5, b\u00e5de n\u00e4r man bed\u00f6mde beskrivningens...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-25-10-2017-5348-patent\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"3 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-25-10-2017-5348-patent\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-25-10-2017-5348-patent\/","name":"KHO 25.10.2017\/5348 - Patent - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-01T20:05:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-25-10-2017-5348-patent\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-25-10-2017-5348-patent\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-25-10-2017-5348-patent\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"KHO 25.10.2017\/5348 – Patent"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/810558","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=810558"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=810558"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=810558"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=810558"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=810558"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=810558"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=810558"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=810558"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}