{"id":822562,"date":"2026-05-03T08:00:24","date_gmt":"2026-05-03T06:00:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/kho-17-1-2017-130-tyosuojelu\/"},"modified":"2026-05-03T08:00:24","modified_gmt":"2026-05-03T06:00:24","slug":"kho-17-1-2017-130-tyosuojelu","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-17-1-2017-130-tyosuojelu\/","title":{"rendered":"KHO 17.1.2017\/130 – Ty\u00f6suojelu"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

$a7<\/p>\n

Ty\u00f6suojelun vastuualue oli katsonut, ett\u00e4 A Oy ei ollut osoittanut riitt\u00e4v\u00e4\u00e4 huolellisuutta hyv\u00e4ksym\u00e4ll\u00e4 B Oy:n ep\u00e4m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4iset todistukset. A Oy:lle oli t\u00e4m\u00e4n seikan ja er\u00e4iden muiden seikkojen perusteella m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4tty 5 200 euron laiminly\u00f6ntimaksu.<\/p>\n

Hallinto-oikeus oli katsonut, ett\u00e4 todistukset eiv\u00e4t olleet siin\u00e4 m\u00e4\u00e4rin virheellisen n\u00e4k\u00f6isi\u00e4, ett\u00e4 A Oy:n edustajien olisi ollut syyt\u00e4 ep\u00e4ill\u00e4 niiden aitoutta pelk\u00e4st\u00e4\u00e4n niiden ulkoasun perusteella. Hallinto-oikeus oli asiaa kokonaisuutena harkiten pit\u00e4nyt A Oy:n laiminly\u00f6nti\u00e4 siten v\u00e4h\u00e4isen\u00e4, ett\u00e4 laiminly\u00f6ntimaksu oli perusteltua ja kohtuullista j\u00e4tt\u00e4\u00e4 m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4\u00e4m\u00e4tt\u00e4 tilaajavastuulain 9 \u00a7:n 4 momentin nojalla.<\/p>\n

$a8<\/p>\n

Tilaajan selvitysvelvollisuudesta ja vastuusta ulkopuolista ty\u00f6voimaa k\u00e4ytett\u00e4ess\u00e4 annettu laki 1 \u00a7, 5 \u00a7 1 momentti, 5 a \u00a7 ja 9 \u00a7 1 momentti 1 kohta<\/p>\n

Yritys- ja yhteis\u00f6tietolaki 15 \u00a7 (637\/2006) 1 ja 2 momentti<\/h3>\n

Asian ovat ratkaisseet oikeusneuvokset Irma Telivuo, Leena \u00c4\u00e4ril\u00e4, Mikko Pikkuj\u00e4ms\u00e4, Vesa-Pekka Nuotio ja Antti Pekkala. Asian esittelij\u00e4 Jouko Tuomi.<\/p>\n

$a9<\/p>\n

Ansvarsomr\u00e5det f\u00f6r arbetarskyddet hade ansett att A Ab inte hade visat tillr\u00e4cklig omsorg n\u00e4r bolaget accepterade B Ab:s vaga intyg. Med anledning av detta samt andra omst\u00e4ndigheter hade A Ab p\u00e5f\u00f6rts en 5 200 euro stor f\u00f6rsummelseavgift.<\/p>\n

F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade ansett att intygen inte s\u00e5g s\u00e5 felaktiga ut att A Ab:s representanter hade haft orsak att misst\u00e4nka \u00e4ktheten av dem enbart med anledning av hur intygen s\u00e5g ut. F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade efter en helhetsbed\u00f6mning av saken ansett att A Ab:s f\u00f6rsummelse hade varit s\u00e5 ringa att det med st\u00f6d av 9 \u00a7 4 mom. i best\u00e4llaransvarslagen var motiverat och sk\u00e4ligt att inte p\u00e5f\u00f6ra A Ab p\u00e5f\u00f6ljdsavgift.<\/p>\n

$aa<\/p>\n

Eftersom A Ab inte hade g\u00e5tt till v\u00e4ga p\u00e5 ovan n\u00e4mnt s\u00e4tt, utan s\u00e5som utredning hade accepterat dokument vars \u00e4kthet det hade funnit orsak att betvivla, hade A Ab f\u00f6rsummat den utredningsskyldighet om vilken best\u00e4ms i 5 \u00a7 i best\u00e4llaransvarslagen. Eftersom A Ab:s g\u00e4rning inte skulle anses vara ringa, upph\u00e4vde h\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolens beslut och satte i kraft det beslut som ansvarsomr\u00e5det f\u00f6r arbetarskyddet hade fattat. Omr\u00f6stning 4 – 1.<\/p>\n

Lagen om best\u00e4llarens utredningsskyldighet och ansvar vid anlitande av utomst\u00e5ende arbetskraft 1 \u00a7, 5 \u00a7 1 mom., 5 a \u00a7 och 9 \u00a7 1 mom. 1 punkten<\/p>\n

F\u00f6retags- och organisationsdatalag 15 \u00a7 (637\/2006) 1 och 2 mom.<\/p>\n

\u00c4rendet har avgjorts av justitier\u00e5den Irma Telivuo, Leena \u00c4\u00e4ril\u00e4, Mikko Pikkuj\u00e4ms\u00e4, Vesa-Pekka Nuotio och Antti Pekkala. F\u00f6redragande Jouko Tuomi.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Finlex open data, CC BY 4.0. Documentation open data verifiee le 2026-04-12 ; les endpoints judgment documentes renvoient 404 pour les types case-law exposes par le frontend, fallback actuel sur les pages publiques data.finlex.fi.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

$a7 Ty\u00f6suojelun vastuualue oli katsonut, ett\u00e4 A Oy ei ollut osoittanut riitt\u00e4v\u00e4\u00e4 huolellisuutta hyv\u00e4ksym\u00e4ll\u00e4 B Oy:n ep\u00e4m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4iset todistukset. A Oy:lle oli t\u00e4m\u00e4n seikan ja er\u00e4iden muiden seikkojen perusteella m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4tty 5 200 euron laiminly\u00f6ntimaksu. Hallinto-oikeus oli katsonut, ett\u00e4 todistukset eiv\u00e4t olleet siin\u00e4 m\u00e4\u00e4rin virheellisen n\u00e4k\u00f6isi\u00e4, ett\u00e4 A Oy:n edustajien olisi ollut syyt\u00e4 ep\u00e4ill\u00e4 niiden aitoutta pelk\u00e4st\u00e4\u00e4n…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7740],"kji_court":[28668],"kji_chamber":[31727],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[61202],"kji_language":[7746],"class_list":["post-822562","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-finlande","kji_court-cour-supreme-administrative-de-finlande","kji_chamber-sommaires","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-tyosuojelu","kji_language-multilingue"],"yoast_head":"\nKHO 17.1.2017\/130 - Ty\u00f6suojelu - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-17-1-2017-130-tyosuojelu\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"KHO 17.1.2017\/130 - Ty\u00f6suojelu\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"$a7 Ty\u00f6suojelun vastuualue oli katsonut, ett\u00e4 A Oy ei ollut osoittanut riitt\u00e4v\u00e4\u00e4 huolellisuutta hyv\u00e4ksym\u00e4ll\u00e4 B Oy:n ep\u00e4m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4iset todistukset. A Oy:lle oli t\u00e4m\u00e4n seikan ja er\u00e4iden muiden seikkojen perusteella m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4tty 5 200 euron laiminly\u00f6ntimaksu. Hallinto-oikeus oli katsonut, ett\u00e4 todistukset eiv\u00e4t olleet siin\u00e4 m\u00e4\u00e4rin virheellisen n\u00e4k\u00f6isi\u00e4, ett\u00e4 A Oy:n edustajien olisi ollut syyt\u00e4 ep\u00e4ill\u00e4 niiden aitoutta pelk\u00e4st\u00e4\u00e4n...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-17-1-2017-130-tyosuojelu\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-17-1-2017-130-tyosuojelu\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-17-1-2017-130-tyosuojelu\\\/\",\"name\":\"KHO 17.1.2017\\\/130 - Ty\u00f6suojelu - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-03T06:00:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-17-1-2017-130-tyosuojelu\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-17-1-2017-130-tyosuojelu\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-17-1-2017-130-tyosuojelu\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"KHO 17.1.2017\\\/130 – Ty\u00f6suojelu\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"KHO 17.1.2017\/130 - Ty\u00f6suojelu - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-17-1-2017-130-tyosuojelu\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"KHO 17.1.2017\/130 - Ty\u00f6suojelu","og_description":"$a7 Ty\u00f6suojelun vastuualue oli katsonut, ett\u00e4 A Oy ei ollut osoittanut riitt\u00e4v\u00e4\u00e4 huolellisuutta hyv\u00e4ksym\u00e4ll\u00e4 B Oy:n ep\u00e4m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4iset todistukset. A Oy:lle oli t\u00e4m\u00e4n seikan ja er\u00e4iden muiden seikkojen perusteella m\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4tty 5 200 euron laiminly\u00f6ntimaksu. Hallinto-oikeus oli katsonut, ett\u00e4 todistukset eiv\u00e4t olleet siin\u00e4 m\u00e4\u00e4rin virheellisen n\u00e4k\u00f6isi\u00e4, ett\u00e4 A Oy:n edustajien olisi ollut syyt\u00e4 ep\u00e4ill\u00e4 niiden aitoutta pelk\u00e4st\u00e4\u00e4n...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-17-1-2017-130-tyosuojelu\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"2 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-17-1-2017-130-tyosuojelu\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-17-1-2017-130-tyosuojelu\/","name":"KHO 17.1.2017\/130 - Ty\u00f6suojelu - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-03T06:00:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-17-1-2017-130-tyosuojelu\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-17-1-2017-130-tyosuojelu\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-17-1-2017-130-tyosuojelu\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"KHO 17.1.2017\/130 – Ty\u00f6suojelu"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/822562","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=822562"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=822562"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=822562"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=822562"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=822562"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=822562"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=822562"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=822562"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}