{"id":823491,"date":"2026-05-03T10:46:26","date_gmt":"2026-05-03T08:46:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-22-decembre-2016-n-1222-3724-2\/"},"modified":"2026-05-03T10:46:28","modified_gmt":"2026-05-03T08:46:28","slug":"cour-de-cassation-22-decembre-2016-n-1222-3724-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-22-decembre-2016-n-1222-3724-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation, 22 d\u00e9cembre 2016, n\u00b0 1222-3724"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

N\u00b0 99 \/ 16. du 22.12.2016.<\/p>\n

Num\u00e9ro 3724 du registre.<\/p>\n

Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, vingt-deux d\u00e9cembre deux mille sei ze.<\/p>\n

Composition:<\/p>\n

Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Nico EDON, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Carlo HEYARD, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation, Marie MACKEL, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019appel, Simone FLAMMANG, avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, Viviane PROBST, greffier \u00e0 la Cour.<\/p>\n

Entre:<\/p>\n

X, demeurant \u00e0 (\u2026),<\/p>\n

demanderesse en cassation,<\/p>\n

comparant par Ma\u00eetre Fernando A. DIAS SOBRAL , avocat \u00e0 la Cour, en l\u2019\u00e9tude duquel domicile est \u00e9lu,<\/p>\n

et:<\/p>\n

l\u2019ASSOCIATION D\u2019ASSURANCE ACCIDENT, \u00e9tablissement public, \u00e9tablie et ayant son si\u00e8ge \u00e0 L-2976 Luxembourg, 125, route d\u2019Esch, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par le pr\u00e9sident de son comit\u00e9 directeur, inscrite au registre de commerce et des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s sous le num\u00e9ro J 16,<\/p>\n

d\u00e9fenderesse en cassation.<\/p>\n

=======================================================<\/p>\n

LA COUR DE CASSATION :<\/p>\n

Vu l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 rendu le 11 janvier 2016 sous le num\u00e9ro 2016\/0008 (No. du reg. : G 2014\/0228) par le Conseil sup\u00e9rieur de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale ;<\/p>\n

Vu le m\u00e9moire en cassation signifi\u00e9 le 16 mars 2016 par X \u00e0 l\u2019ASSOCIATION D\u2019ASSURANCE ACCIDENT, d\u00e9pos\u00e9 au greffe de la Cour le 18 mars 2016 ;<\/p>\n

Sur le rapport du conseiller Carlo HEYARD et sur les conclusions du premier avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral John PETRY ;<\/p>\n

Sur les faits :<\/p>\n

Attendu, selon l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9, que le Conseil arbitral de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale avait, sur base de rapports m\u00e9dicaux, d\u00e9clar\u00e9 non fond\u00e9 le recours form\u00e9 par X contre une d\u00e9cision du comit\u00e9 directeur de l\u2019ASSOCIATION D\u2019ASSURANCE ACCIDENT de refuser la prise en charge d\u2019un traitement m\u00e9dical que la requ\u00e9rante affirmait \u00eatre en relation causale avec un accident du travail et avait refus\u00e9 l\u2019institution d\u2019une expertise m\u00e9dicale suppl\u00e9mentaire ; que sur appel de X , le Conseil sup\u00e9rieur de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale a confirm\u00e9 le jugement entrepris ;<\/p>\n

Sur l\u2019unique moyen de cassation :<\/p>\n

\u00ab tir\u00e9 de la violation de l\u2019article 6\u00a71 de la CESDH qui garantit le droit \u00e0 un proc\u00e8s \u00e9quitable disposant que 1. Toute personne a droit \u00e0 ce que sa cause soit entendue \u00e9quitablement, publiquement et dans un d\u00e9lai raisonnable, par un tribunal ind\u00e9pendant et impartial, \u00e9tabli par la loi, qui d\u00e9cidera, soit des contestations sur ses droits et obligations de caract\u00e8re civil, (\u2026)<\/p>\n

En ce que<\/p>\n

Le Conseil sup\u00e9rieur de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale CSSS a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 l'appel non fond\u00e9 et rejet\u00e9 de surcro\u00eet la demande de contre-expertise demand\u00e9e<\/p>\n

aux motifs que<\/p>\n

<< qu'il appartient \u00e0 l'assur\u00e9 de d\u00e9montrer positivement l'existence d'un lien causal entre sa pathologie et l'accident de travail, afin que la r\u00e9ouverture de son dossier puisse \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9e justifi\u00e9e. De simples critiques formul\u00e9es contre l'expertise m\u00e9dicale ne sont pas de nature \u00e0 rapporter cette preuve. M\u00eame le Docteur Y, dans son expertise et son \u2019\u2019dire \u00e0 expert\u2019\u2019 n'affirme pas qu'un tel lien de causalit\u00e9 est \u00e9tabli, ni m\u00eame probable, mais il est fait \u00e9tat du fait que la l\u00e9sion initiale serait \u2019\u2019capable\u2019\u2019 de d\u00e9terminer la pathologie actuelle, ce qui documente une simple possibilit\u00e9, mais pas un lien causal certain,<\/p>\n

alors que<\/p>\n

3 Le droit \u00e0 un tribunal impartial impose \u00e0 la juridiction saisie d'analyser et de lire attentivement et objectivement tous les \u00e9l\u00e9ments du dossier dans leurs moindres d\u00e9tails, ce qui ne fut pas le cas en l'esp\u00e8ce, alors que contrairement aux motifs retenus par le CSSS, le Dr Y a clairement et express\u00e9ment retenu dans son rapport d'expertise le lien de causalit\u00e9 entre les l\u00e9sions du pied de la requ\u00e9rante et son accident de travail \u00bb ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que sous le couvert du grief de la violation de la disposition vis\u00e9e au moyen, celui-ci ne tend qu\u2019\u00e0 remettre en discussion l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souveraine, par les juges d\u2019appel, de la valeur d\u2019un \u00e9l\u00e9ment de preuve qui leur a \u00e9t\u00e9 soumis, appr\u00e9ciation qui \u00e9chappe au contr\u00f4le de la Cour de cassation ;<\/p>\n

Qu\u2019il en suit que le moyen ne saurait \u00eatre accueilli ;<\/p>\n

Par ces motifs,<\/p>\n

rejette le pourvoi ;<\/p>\n

condamne la demanderesse en cassation aux d\u00e9pens de l\u2019instance en cassation.<\/p>\n

La lecture du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite en la susdite audience publique par Monsieur le pr\u00e9sident Jean- Claude WIWINIUS, en pr\u00e9sence de Madame Simone FLAMMANG, avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, et de Madame Viviane PROBST, greffier \u00e0 la Cour.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Licence CC BY-ND 4.0 (Administration judiciaire, data.public.lu). Republication autorisee avec attribution, sans modification editoriale du texte integral.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

N\u00b0 99 \/ 16. du 22.12.2016. Num\u00e9ro 3724 du registre. Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, vingt-deux d\u00e9cembre deux mille sei ze. Composition: Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation,\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[8418],"kji_court":[8423],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[61603],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8424,8464],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-823491","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-luxembourg","kji_court-cour-de-cassation","kji_year-61603","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-decembre","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour de cassation, 22 d\u00e9cembre 2016, n\u00b0 1222-3724 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-22-decembre-2016-n-1222-3724-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation, 22 d\u00e9cembre 2016, n\u00b0 1222-3724\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"N\u00b0 99 \/ 16. du 22.12.2016. Num\u00e9ro 3724 du registre. Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, vingt-deux d\u00e9cembre deux mille sei ze. Composition: Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation,\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-22-decembre-2016-n-1222-3724-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-03T08:46:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-22-decembre-2016-n-1222-3724-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-22-decembre-2016-n-1222-3724-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 22 d\u00e9cembre 2016, n\u00b0 1222-3724 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-03T08:46:26+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-03T08:46:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-22-decembre-2016-n-1222-3724-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-22-decembre-2016-n-1222-3724-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-22-decembre-2016-n-1222-3724-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation, 22 d\u00e9cembre 2016, n\u00b0 1222-3724\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation, 22 d\u00e9cembre 2016, n\u00b0 1222-3724 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-22-decembre-2016-n-1222-3724-2\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation, 22 d\u00e9cembre 2016, n\u00b0 1222-3724","og_description":"N\u00b0 99 \/ 16. du 22.12.2016. Num\u00e9ro 3724 du registre. Audience publique de la Cour de cassation du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg du jeudi, vingt-deux d\u00e9cembre deux mille sei ze. Composition: Jean-Claude WIWINIUS, pr\u00e9sident de la Cour, Romain LUDOVICY, conseiller \u00e0 la Cour de cassation,\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-22-decembre-2016-n-1222-3724-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-05-03T08:46:28+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"4 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-22-decembre-2016-n-1222-3724-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-22-decembre-2016-n-1222-3724-2\/","name":"Cour de cassation, 22 d\u00e9cembre 2016, n\u00b0 1222-3724 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-03T08:46:26+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-03T08:46:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-22-decembre-2016-n-1222-3724-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-22-decembre-2016-n-1222-3724-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-22-decembre-2016-n-1222-3724-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation, 22 d\u00e9cembre 2016, n\u00b0 1222-3724"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/823491","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=823491"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=823491"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=823491"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=823491"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=823491"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=823491"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=823491"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=823491"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}