{"id":884175,"date":"2026-05-12T19:29:56","date_gmt":"2026-05-12T17:29:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/kho-13-7-2016-3151-utlanningsarende\/"},"modified":"2026-05-12T19:29:56","modified_gmt":"2026-05-12T17:29:56","slug":"kho-13-7-2016-3151-utlanningsarende","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-13-7-2016-3151-utlanningsarende\/","title":{"rendered":"KHO 13.7.2016\/3151 &#8211; Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Migrationsverket hade avslagit tv\u00e5 irakiska medborgares ans\u00f6kan om asyl med h\u00e4nvisning till att ans\u00f6kningarna varit uppenbart ogrundade och kr\u00e4vt att s\u00f6kandena omedelbart skulle \u00e5terv\u00e4nda till Italien, d\u00e4r de hade beviljats status som alternativt skyddsbeh\u00f6vande. Till familjen h\u00f6rde ocks\u00e5 tv\u00e5 sm\u00e5 barn.<\/p>\n<p>F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen ans\u00e5g att s\u00f6kandena och deras barn var i behov av s\u00e4rskilt skydd. F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen \u00e5tervisade saken till Migrationsverket f\u00f6r ny handl\u00e4ggning och f\u00f6r utredning av om familjen i Italien skulle komma att erbjudas s\u00e5dana f\u00f6rh\u00e5llanden som var l\u00e4mpliga med tanke p\u00e5 barnens \u00e5lder och om s\u00f6kandena och deras barn kunde s\u00e4ndas tillbaka till Italien utan att d\u00e4r bli f\u00f6rem\u00e5l f\u00f6r behandling som kr\u00e4nkte m\u00e4nniskov\u00e4rdet. Bland de r\u00e4ttsnormer som f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen hade till\u00e4mpat h\u00e4nvisade den till Europeiska m\u00e4nniskor\u00e4ttsdomstolens avg\u00f6rande Tarakhel mot Schweiz samt till den EU-f\u00f6rordning som brukar kallas ansvarsbest\u00e4mningsf\u00f6rordningen.<\/p>\n<p>Migrationsverket \u00f6verklagade f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolens beslut hos h\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen. H\u00f6gsta f\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen konstaterade att eftersom s\u00f6kandena i Italien hade beviljats status som alternativt skyddsbeh\u00f6vande, skulle ansvarsbest\u00e4mningsf\u00f6rordningen inte till\u00e4mpas. R\u00e4ttsfr\u00e5gan var i st\u00e4llet om s\u00f6kandenas ans\u00f6kningar om internationellt skydd hade kunnat avsl\u00e5s som uppenbart ogrundade eller inte.<\/p>\n<p>S\u00f6kandena hade anl\u00e4nt till Finland fr\u00e5n Italien, som var ett s\u00e4kert asylland. N\u00e4r ans\u00f6kan avgjordes hade det d\u00e4rf\u00f6r i princip varit m\u00f6jligt att till\u00e4mpa 101 \u00a7 3 mom. i utl\u00e4nningslagen.<\/p>\n<p>Presumtionen att ett land \u00e4r ett s\u00e4kert asylland \u00e4r emellertid inte s\u00e5dan att den inte skulle kunna omkullkastas. N\u00e4sta fr\u00e5ga som skulle besvaras var d\u00e4rf\u00f6r om s\u00f6kandena och deras barn kunde s\u00e4ndas tillbaka till Italien utan att d\u00e4r bli f\u00f6rem\u00e5l f\u00f6r s\u00e5dan om\u00e4nsklig behandling som avses i artikel 3 i Europeiska m\u00e4nniskor\u00e4ttskonventionen eller s\u00e5dan behandling som avses i 147 \u00a7 i utl\u00e4nningslagen.<\/p>\n<p>$b8<\/p>\n<p>Finlands grundlag 9 \u00a7 4 mom.<\/p>\n<h3>Europeiska m\u00e4nniskor\u00e4ttskonventionen artikel 3<\/h3>\n<h3>Europeiska unionens stadga om de grundl\u00e4ggande r\u00e4ttigheterna, artiklarna 4, 18 och 19<\/h3>\n<p>R\u00e5dets direktiv 2005\/85\/EG om miniminormer f\u00f6r medlemsstaternas f\u00f6rfaranden f\u00f6r beviljande eller \u00e5terkallande av flyktingstatus (det s.k. f\u00f6rfarandedirektivet) artikel 25.2 a och 25.2 d samt artikel 26<\/p>\n<p>Europaparlamentets och r\u00e5dets direktiv 2013\/32\/EU om gemensamma f\u00f6rfaranden f\u00f6r att bevilja och \u00e5terkalla internationellt skydd (det s\u00e5 kallade omarbetade f\u00f6rfarandedirektivet), artikel 33.2 a och artikel 35<\/p>\n<p>Europaparlamentets och r\u00e5dets direktiv 2011\/95\/EU om normer f\u00f6r n\u00e4r tredjelandsmedborgare eller statsl\u00f6sa personer ska anses ber\u00e4ttigade till internationellt skydd, f\u00f6r en enhetlig status f\u00f6r flyktingar eller personer som uppfyller kraven f\u00f6r att betecknas som subsidi\u00e4rt skyddsbeh\u00f6vande, och f\u00f6r inneh\u00e5llet i det beviljade skyddet (det s.k. omarbetade skyddsgrundsdirektivet) kapitel VII<\/p>\n<p>Utl\u00e4nningslagen 6 \u00a7 1 mom., 99 \u00a7 (301\/2004), 101 \u00a7 3 punkten (973\/2007) och 147 \u00a7<\/p>\n<p>Europeiska m\u00e4nniskor\u00e4ttsdomstolens domar i m\u00e5len Saadi mot Italien 28.2.2008, N. mot F\u00f6renade konungariket 27.5.2008 och M.S.S. mot Belgien och Grekland 21.1.2011<\/p>\n<p>Europeiska m\u00e4nniskor\u00e4ttsdomstolens beslut i m\u00e5let Mohammed Hussein mot Nederl\u00e4nderna och Italien 2.4.2014<\/p>\n<p>\u00c4rendet har avgjorts av f\u00f6rvaltningsr\u00e5den Matti Pellonp\u00e4\u00e4, Anne E. Niemi, Sakari Vanhala, Janne Aer och Petri Helander. F\u00f6redragande Hannele Klemettinen.<\/p>\n<p>Maahanmuuttovirasto oli hyl\u00e4nnyt kahden Irakin kansalaisen turvapaikkahakemuksen ilmeisen perusteettomana ja vaatinut heit\u00e4 v\u00e4litt\u00f6m\u00e4sti siirtym\u00e4\u00e4n Italiaan, jossa heille oli my\u00f6nnetty toissijainen suojeluasema. Perheeseen kuului my\u00f6s kaksi pient\u00e4 lasta.<\/p>\n<p>Hallinto-oikeus katsoi, ett\u00e4 hakijat lapsineen olivat erityisen suojelun tarpeessa. Hallinto-oikeus palautti asian Maahanmuuttovirastolle uudelleen k\u00e4sitelt\u00e4v\u00e4ksi sen selvitt\u00e4miseksi, tullaanko Italiassa tarjoamaan perheelle lasten ik\u00e4tasoon sopivat olosuhteet ja voidaanko asianosaiset lapsineen palauttaa Italiaan siten, ett\u00e4 he eiv\u00e4t joudu siell\u00e4 ihmisarvoa loukkaavan kohtelun kohteeksi. Hallinto-oikeus viittasi sovelletuissa oikeusohjeissa Euroopan ihmisoikeustuomioistuimen ratkaisuun Tarakhel v. Sveitsi sek\u00e4 niin sanottuun vastuunm\u00e4\u00e4ritt\u00e4misasetukseen.<\/p>\n<p>Korkein hallinto-oikeus totesi Maahanmuuttoviraston valituksesta, ett\u00e4 koska hakijoille oli my\u00f6nnetty Italiassa toissijainen suojeluasema, asiassa ei sovellettu vastuunm\u00e4\u00e4ritt\u00e4misasetusta. Sit\u00e4 vastoin oikeudellisena kysymyksen\u00e4 asiassa oli, oliko hakijoiden kansainv\u00e4list\u00e4 suojelua koskevat hakemukset voitu hyl\u00e4t\u00e4 ilmeisen perusteettomina.<\/p>\n<p>Hakijat olivat saapuneet Suomeen Italiasta, joka oli turvallinen turvapaikkamaa. Hakemusta ratkaistaessa oli l\u00e4ht\u00f6kohtaisesti voitu soveltaa ulkomaalaislain 101 \u00a7:n 3 momenttia.<\/p>\n<p>Koska oletus turvallisesta turvapaikkamaasta ei kuitenkaan ole kumoamaton, asiassa oli seuraavaksi arvioitava, voitiinko hakijat lapsineen palauttaa Italiaan siten, ett\u00e4 he eiv\u00e4t joudu siell\u00e4 Euroopan ihmisoikeussopimuksen 3 artiklassa tarkoitetun ep\u00e4inhimillisen kohtelun kohteeksi tai ulkomaalaislain 147 \u00a7:ss\u00e4 tarkoitetun kohtelun kohteeksi.<\/p>\n<p>$b9<\/p>\n<h3>Suomen perustuslaki 9 \u00a7 4 momentti<\/h3>\n<h3>Euroopan ihmisoikeussopimus 3 artikla<\/h3>\n<h3>Euroopan unionin perusoikeuskirja 4 artikla, 18 artikla ja 19 artikla<\/h3>\n<p>Pakolaisaseman my\u00f6nt\u00e4mist\u00e4 tai poistamista koskevissa menettelyiss\u00e4 j\u00e4senvaltioissa sovellettavista v\u00e4himm\u00e4isvaatimuksista annettu neuvoston direktiivi 2005\/85\/EY (ns. menettelydirektiivi) 25 artikla 2 kohta a ja d alakohta ja 26 artikla<\/p>\n<p>Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston direktiivi 2013\/32\/EU kansainv\u00e4lisen suojelun my\u00f6nt\u00e4mist\u00e4 ja poistamista koskevista yhteisist\u00e4 menettelyist\u00e4 (ns. uudelleenlaadittu menettelydirektiivi), 33 artikla 2 kohta a alakohta ja 35 artikla<\/p>\n<p>Vaatimuksista kolmansien maiden kansalaisten ja kansalaisuudettomien henkil\u00f6iden m\u00e4\u00e4rittelemiseksi kansainv\u00e4list\u00e4 suojelua saaviksi henkil\u00f6iksi, pakolaisten ja henkil\u00f6iden, jotka voivat saada toissijaista suojelua, yhdenmukaiselle asemalle sek\u00e4 my\u00f6nnetyn suojelun sis\u00e4ll\u00f6lle annetun Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston direktiivin 2011\/95\/EU (ns. uudelleenlaadittu m\u00e4\u00e4ritelm\u00e4direktiivi) VII luku<\/p>\n<h3>Ulkomaalaislaki 6 \u00a7 1 momentti, 99 \u00a7 (301\/2004), 101 \u00a7 3 kohta (973\/2007) ja 147 \u00a7<\/h3>\n<p>Euroopan ihmisoikeustuomioistuimen tuomiot Saadi v. Italia 28.2.2008, N. v. Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta 27.5.2008 ja M.S.S. v. Belgia ja Kreikka 21.1.2011<\/p>\n<p>Euroopan ihmisoikeustuomioistuimen p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00f6s Mohammed Hussein v. Alankomaat ja Italia 2.4.2013<\/p>\n<p>Asian ovat ratkaisseet hallintoneuvokset Matti Pellonp\u00e4\u00e4, Anne E. Niemi, Sakari Vanhala, Janne Aer ja Petri Helander. Asian esittelij\u00e4 Hannele Klemettinen.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.finlex.fi\/en\/case-law\/supreme-administrative-court\/decision-summary\/2016\/3151\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Finlex open data, CC BY 4.0. Documentation open data verifiee le 2026-04-12 ; les endpoints judgment documentes renvoient 404 pour les types case-law exposes par le frontend, fallback actuel sur les pages publiques data.finlex.fi.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Migrationsverket hade avslagit tv\u00e5 irakiska medborgares ans\u00f6kan om asyl med h\u00e4nvisning till att ans\u00f6kningarna varit uppenbart ogrundade och kr\u00e4vt att s\u00f6kandena omedelbart skulle \u00e5terv\u00e4nda till Italien, d\u00e4r de hade beviljats status som alternativt skyddsbeh\u00f6vande. Till familjen h\u00f6rde ocks\u00e5 tv\u00e5 sm\u00e5 barn. F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen ans\u00e5g att s\u00f6kandena och deras barn var i behov av s\u00e4rskilt skydd. F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7740],"kji_court":[28668],"kji_chamber":[31727],"kji_year":[61603],"kji_subject":[7612],"kji_keyword":[29169,47815,34755,28704,28700],"kji_language":[7746],"class_list":["post-884175","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-finlande","kji_court-cour-supreme-administrative-de-finlande","kji_chamber-sommaires","kji_year-61603","kji_subject-fiscal","kji_keyword-avslagit","kji_keyword-irakiska","kji_keyword-medborgares","kji_keyword-migrationsverket","kji_keyword-utlanningsarende","kji_language-multilingue"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.6 (Yoast SEO v27.6) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>KHO 13.7.2016\/3151 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-13-7-2016-3151-utlanningsarende\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"KHO 13.7.2016\/3151 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Migrationsverket hade avslagit tv\u00e5 irakiska medborgares ans\u00f6kan om asyl med h\u00e4nvisning till att ans\u00f6kningarna varit uppenbart ogrundade och kr\u00e4vt att s\u00f6kandena omedelbart skulle \u00e5terv\u00e4nda till Italien, d\u00e4r de hade beviljats status som alternativt skyddsbeh\u00f6vande. Till familjen h\u00f6rde ocks\u00e5 tv\u00e5 sm\u00e5 barn. F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen ans\u00e5g att s\u00f6kandena och deras barn var i behov av s\u00e4rskilt skydd. F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-13-7-2016-3151-utlanningsarende\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-13-7-2016-3151-utlanningsarende\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-13-7-2016-3151-utlanningsarende\\\/\",\"name\":\"KHO 13.7.2016\\\/3151 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-12T17:29:56+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-13-7-2016-3151-utlanningsarende\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-13-7-2016-3151-utlanningsarende\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/kho-13-7-2016-3151-utlanningsarende\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"KHO 13.7.2016\\\/3151 &#8211; Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"KHO 13.7.2016\/3151 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-13-7-2016-3151-utlanningsarende\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"KHO 13.7.2016\/3151 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende","og_description":"Migrationsverket hade avslagit tv\u00e5 irakiska medborgares ans\u00f6kan om asyl med h\u00e4nvisning till att ans\u00f6kningarna varit uppenbart ogrundade och kr\u00e4vt att s\u00f6kandena omedelbart skulle \u00e5terv\u00e4nda till Italien, d\u00e4r de hade beviljats status som alternativt skyddsbeh\u00f6vande. Till familjen h\u00f6rde ocks\u00e5 tv\u00e5 sm\u00e5 barn. F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen ans\u00e5g att s\u00f6kandena och deras barn var i behov av s\u00e4rskilt skydd. F\u00f6rvaltningsdomstolen...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-13-7-2016-3151-utlanningsarende\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"5 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-13-7-2016-3151-utlanningsarende\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-13-7-2016-3151-utlanningsarende\/","name":"KHO 13.7.2016\/3151 - Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-12T17:29:56+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-13-7-2016-3151-utlanningsarende\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-13-7-2016-3151-utlanningsarende\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/kho-13-7-2016-3151-utlanningsarende\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"KHO 13.7.2016\/3151 &#8211; Utl\u00e4nnings\u00e4rende"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/884175","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=884175"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=884175"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=884175"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=884175"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=884175"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=884175"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=884175"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=884175"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}