{"id":1227575,"date":"2026-07-01T16:20:35","date_gmt":"2026-07-01T14:20:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\/"},"modified":"2026-07-01T16:20:35","modified_gmt":"2026-07-01T14:20:35","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-la-confirmation-des-conditions-de-la-prolongation-de-la-retention\">I. La confirmation des conditions de la prolongation de la r\u00e9tention<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-recevabilite-de-la-requete-et-la-regularite-de-la-procedure\">A. La recevabilit\u00e9 de la requ\u00eate et la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-les-diligences-suffisantes-de-ladministration-comme-condition-de-fond\">B. Les diligences suffisantes de l\u2019administration comme condition de fond<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-portee-de-lappreciation-judiciaire-sur-les-garanties-procedurales\">II. La port\u00e9e de l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation judiciaire sur les garanties proc\u00e9durales<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-conciliation-entre-droits-fondamentaux-et-efficacite-de-la-mesure-deloignem\">A. La conciliation entre droits fondamentaux et efficacit\u00e9 de la mesure d\u2019\u00e9loignement<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-levolution-jurisprudentielle-sur-la-charge-de-la-preuve-des-diligences\">B. L\u2019\u00e9volution jurisprudentielle sur la charge de la preuve des diligences<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Par une ordonnance rendue le 28 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a statu\u00e9 sur une requ\u00eate en prolongation de la r\u00e9tention administrative d\u2019un \u00e9tranger faisant l\u2019objet d\u2019une obligation de quitter le territoire fran\u00e7ais sans d\u00e9lai, assortie d\u2019une interdiction de retour. Le 27 f\u00e9vrier 2026, l\u2019autorit\u00e9 administrative avait plac\u00e9 l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9 en r\u00e9tention. Une premi\u00e8re prolongation de vingt-six jours avait \u00e9t\u00e9 ordonn\u00e9e le 3 mars 2026. Le 27 mars 2026, l\u2019administration a saisi le juge aux fins d\u2019une seconde prolongation de trente jours, sur le fondement des articles L. 742-4 et suivants du code de l\u2019entr\u00e9e et du s\u00e9jour des \u00e9trangers et du droit d\u2019asile (CESEDA). La question de droit pos\u00e9e \u00e9tait de savoir si les conditions l\u00e9gales de cette prolongation \u00e9taient r\u00e9unies, notamment au regard des diligences accomplies par l\u2019administration pour ex\u00e9cuter la mesure d\u2019\u00e9loignement. Le juge a constat\u00e9 que la requ\u00eate \u00e9tait recevable, la proc\u00e9dure r\u00e9guli\u00e8re, et que l\u2019administration avait justifi\u00e9 de d\u00e9marches suffisantes aupr\u00e8s des autorit\u00e9s consulaires. Il a en cons\u00e9quence ordonn\u00e9 la prolongation de la r\u00e9tention pour une dur\u00e9e suppl\u00e9mentaire de trente jours.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-la-confirmation-des-conditions-de-la-prolongation-de-la-retention\">I. La confirmation des conditions de la prolongation de la r\u00e9tention<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-recevabilite-de-la-requete-et-la-regularite-de-la-procedure\">A. La recevabilit\u00e9 de la requ\u00eate et la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention a d\u2019abord v\u00e9rifi\u00e9 la recevabilit\u00e9 de la requ\u00eate. Il a relev\u00e9 qu\u2019elle \u00e9tait motiv\u00e9e, dat\u00e9e, sign\u00e9e et accompagn\u00e9e des pi\u00e8ces justificatives utiles, dont la copie du registre pr\u00e9vu \u00e0 l\u2019article L. 744-2 du CESEDA. Cette exigence formelle est la condition premi\u00e8re d\u2019une saisine r\u00e9guli\u00e8re. La jurisprudence veille \u00e0 ce que toute requ\u00eate soit mat\u00e9riellement compl\u00e8te, sous peine d\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9. Sur ce point, la Cour d\u2019appel de Toulouse a rappel\u00e9 que la date de la requ\u00eate peut faire l\u2019objet d\u2019une correction si une erreur mat\u00e9rielle est \u00e9tablie, pourvu que le texte et les pi\u00e8ces d\u00e9montrent une intention claire de l\u2019administration <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6788a090a1dbfbd5d79cd532\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Toulouse, 15 janvier 2025, n\u00b025\/00063)<\/a><\/strong>. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, aucun d\u00e9faut de forme n\u2019a \u00e9t\u00e9 soulev\u00e9, l\u2019ordonnance ne mentionne aucune cause d\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>S\u2019agissant de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure, le juge a appliqu\u00e9 l\u2019article L. 743-11 du CESEDA, qui interdit de soulever lors de l\u2019audience relative \u00e0 la seconde prolongation des irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9s ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 la premi\u00e8re prolongation. Il a examin\u00e9 les mentions du registre et a constat\u00e9 que la personne retenue avait \u00e9t\u00e9 inform\u00e9e de ses droits d\u00e8s son placement et avait \u00e9t\u00e9 mise en mesure de les exercer. La violation \u00e9ventuelle des droits de la d\u00e9fense en amont de la premi\u00e8re prolongation \u00e9tait donc forclose. Cette solution est conforme \u00e0 la logique de concentration des moyens qui anime le contentieux de la r\u00e9tention. La Cour d\u2019appel de Rennes a soulign\u00e9 que le respect des d\u00e9lais de saisine conditionne la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure, et qu\u2019une requ\u00eate pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e dans les temps ne saurait \u00eatre \u00e9cart\u00e9e pour tardivet\u00e9 <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67e78dd4a0756e3a702f8d97\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Rennes, 28 mars 2025, n\u00b025\/00209)<\/a><\/strong>. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, la requ\u00eate a \u00e9t\u00e9 re\u00e7ue le 27 mars 2026, soit dans le d\u00e9lai l\u00e9gal, et la proc\u00e9dure a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9clar\u00e9e r\u00e9guli\u00e8re.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-les-diligences-suffisantes-de-ladministration-comme-condition-de-fond\">B. Les diligences suffisantes de l\u2019administration comme condition de fond<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge a ensuite appr\u00e9ci\u00e9 le bien-fond\u00e9 de la demande de prolongation. L\u2019article L. 742-4 du CESEDA permet au juge de prolonger la r\u00e9tention au-del\u00e0 de vingt-huit jours notamment lorsque, malgr\u00e9 les diligences de l\u2019administration, l\u2019\u00e9loignement n\u2019a pu \u00eatre ex\u00e9cut\u00e9 en raison du d\u00e9faut de d\u00e9livrance des documents de voyage par le consulat. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, l\u2019administration a d\u00e9montr\u00e9 avoir saisi les autorit\u00e9s consulaires d\u00e8s le 21 janvier 2026, puis relanc\u00e9 les 24 f\u00e9vrier et 18 mars 2026, et avoir transmis un proc\u00e8s-verbal d\u2019identification le 20 mars 2026. Ces d\u00e9marches constituent des diligences r\u00e9elles et continues.<\/p>\n<p>Le juge a estim\u00e9 que ces \u00e9l\u00e9ments caract\u00e9risaient suffisamment la r\u00e9alisation des diligences requises. Il a \u00e9galement relev\u00e9 que la demande d\u2019asile introduite par l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9 le 4 mars 2026 avait \u00e9t\u00e9 rejet\u00e9e le 11 mars 2026, ce qui \u00e9cartait tout obstacle proc\u00e9dural. En cons\u00e9quence, la condition de fond de l\u2019impossibilit\u00e9 d\u2019ex\u00e9cution malgr\u00e9 les diligences \u00e9tait remplie. La prolongation de trente jours suppl\u00e9mentaires a \u00e9t\u00e9 ordonn\u00e9e. Cette d\u00e9cision s\u2019inscrit dans une jurisprudence constante qui exige de l\u2019administration une preuve concr\u00e8te et document\u00e9e de ses efforts, sans pour autant exiger un r\u00e9sultat.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-portee-de-lappreciation-judiciaire-sur-les-garanties-procedurales\">II. La port\u00e9e de l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation judiciaire sur les garanties proc\u00e9durales<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-conciliation-entre-droits-fondamentaux-et-efficacite-de-la-mesure-deloignem\">A. La conciliation entre droits fondamentaux et efficacit\u00e9 de la mesure d\u2019\u00e9loignement<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge a veill\u00e9 \u00e0 ce que la privation de libert\u00e9 soit strictement encadr\u00e9e. En d\u00e9clarant la proc\u00e9dure r\u00e9guli\u00e8re et la requ\u00eate recevable, il a respect\u00e9 les exigences de l\u2019article 66 de la Constitution et de l\u2019article 5 de la Convention europ\u00e9enne des droits de l\u2019homme. Toutefois, la prolongation ordonn\u00e9e pour trente jours suppl\u00e9mentaires, portant la dur\u00e9e totale de r\u00e9tention au-del\u00e0 de cinquante-six jours, interroge sur l\u2019\u00e9quilibre entre la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 administrative et les droits de l\u2019\u00e9tranger. L\u2019administration a justifi\u00e9 d\u2019une attente de r\u00e9ponse consulaire, mais rien ne garantit que cette r\u00e9ponse interviendra dans le nouveau d\u00e9lai.<\/p>\n<p>La jurisprudence a pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 que les diligences doivent \u00eatre non seulement effectives, mais aussi proportionn\u00e9es. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, les relances espac\u00e9es de trois semaines peuvent \u00eatre jug\u00e9es suffisantes, mais la Cour d\u2019appel de Rennes a rappel\u00e9 que le respect des d\u00e9lais de saisine conditionne la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67e78dd4a0756e3a702f8d97\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Rennes, 28 mars 2025, n\u00b025\/00209)<\/a><\/strong>. Le juge a ici implicitement valid\u00e9 le rythme des d\u00e9marches. Cette solution est classique : le juge ne se substitue pas \u00e0 l\u2019administration dans la conduite des n\u00e9gociations consulaires, mais il sanctionne l\u2019absence totale de diligences. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, les preuves \u00e9taient suffisantes.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-levolution-jurisprudentielle-sur-la-charge-de-la-preuve-des-diligences\">B. L\u2019\u00e9volution jurisprudentielle sur la charge de la preuve des diligences<\/h3>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e contribue \u00e0 pr\u00e9ciser la charge de la preuve incombant \u00e0 l\u2019administration. Le juge a exig\u00e9 la production d\u2019\u00e9l\u00e9ments concrets : date de saisine, dates de relances, transmission du proc\u00e8s-verbal d\u2019identification. Il ne s\u2019est pas content\u00e9 d\u2019une simple affirmation. Cette exigence s\u2019inscrit dans un mouvement jurisprudentiel renfor\u00e7ant le contr\u00f4le judiciaire. La Cour d\u2019appel de Toulouse a par exemple consid\u00e9r\u00e9 qu\u2019une erreur mat\u00e9rielle sur la date de la requ\u00eate ne remettait pas en cause la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 des diligences si le texte de la requ\u00eate mentionnait des dates actualis\u00e9es <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6788a090a1dbfbd5d79cd532\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Toulouse, 15 janvier 2025, n\u00b025\/00063)<\/a><\/strong>. Cela montre que les juges du fond s\u2019attachent \u00e0 la substance plut\u00f4t qu\u2019\u00e0 la forme.<\/p>\n<p>En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le juge a estim\u00e9 que les diligences \u00e9taient suffisantes pour justifier une prolongation. Toutefois, il n\u2019a pas examin\u00e9 si l\u2019administration avait envisag\u00e9 d\u2019autres moyens, comme une assignation \u00e0 r\u00e9sidence. L\u2019article L. 743-13 du CESEDA impose au juge de rechercher si des mesures alternatives sont possibles. La d\u00e9cision ne mentionne pas cette analyse. Ce silence pourrait \u00eatre critiqu\u00e9, car la privation de libert\u00e9 doit \u00eatre une mesure de dernier recours. N\u00e9anmoins, l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9 avait d\u00e9j\u00e0 fait l\u2019objet d\u2019une obligation de quitter le territoire sans d\u00e9lai, ce qui laisse supposer un risque de fuite. La solution retenue, bien que s\u00e9v\u00e8re, reste conforme \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tat du droit positif.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6788a090a1dbfbd5d79cd532\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Toulouse, le 15 janvier 2025, n\u00b025\/00063<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67e78dd4a0756e3a702f8d97\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Rennes, le 28 mars 2025, n\u00b025\/00209<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000042774939\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 744-2 du Code de l&#8217;entr\u00e9e et du s\u00e9jour des \u00e9trangers et du droit d&#8217;asile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Il est tenu, dans tous les lieux de r\u00e9tention, un registre mentionnant l&#8217;\u00e9tat civil des personnes retenues, ainsi que les conditions de leur placement ou de leur maintien en r\u00e9tention. Le registre mentionne \u00e9galement l&#8217;\u00e9tat civil des enfants mineurs accompagnant ces personnes ainsi que les conditions de leur accueil.<br \/>L&#8217;autorit\u00e9 administrative tient \u00e0 la disposition des personnes qui en font la demande les \u00e9l\u00e9ments d&#8217;information concernant les date et heure du d\u00e9but du placement de chaque \u00e9tranger en r\u00e9tention, le lieu exact de celle-ci ainsi que les date et heure des d\u00e9cisions de prolongation.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000048446971\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 743-11 du Code de l&#8217;entr\u00e9e et du s\u00e9jour des \u00e9trangers et du droit d&#8217;asile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>\nA peine d&#8217;irrecevabilit\u00e9, prononc\u00e9e d&#8217;office, aucune irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 ant\u00e9rieure \u00e0 une audience \u00e0 l&#8217;issue de laquelle le magistrat du si\u00e8ge du tribunal judiciaire a prolong\u00e9 la mesure ne peut \u00eatre soulev\u00e9e lors d&#8217;une audience ult\u00e9rieure.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000052086319\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 742-4 du Code de l&#8217;entr\u00e9e et du s\u00e9jour des \u00e9trangers et du droit d&#8217;asile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le magistrat du si\u00e8ge du tribunal judiciaire peut, dans les m\u00eames conditions qu&#8217;\u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 742-1, \u00eatre \u00e0 nouveau saisi aux fins de prolongation du maintien en r\u00e9tention au-del\u00e0 de trente jours, dans les cas suivants :<\/p>\n<p>1\u00b0 En cas d&#8217;urgence absolue ou de menace pour l&#8217;ordre public ;<\/p>\n<p>2\u00b0 Lorsque l&#8217;impossibilit\u00e9 d&#8217;ex\u00e9cuter la d\u00e9cision d&#8217;\u00e9loignement r\u00e9sulte de la perte ou de la destruction des documents de voyage de l&#8217;int\u00e9ress\u00e9, de la dissimulation par celui-ci de son identit\u00e9 ou de l&#8217;obstruction volontaire faite \u00e0 son \u00e9loignement ;<\/p>\n<p>3\u00b0 Lorsque la d\u00e9cision d&#8217;\u00e9loignement n&#8217;a pu \u00eatre ex\u00e9cut\u00e9e en raison :<\/p>\n<p>a) du d\u00e9faut de d\u00e9livrance des documents de voyage par le consulat dont rel\u00e8ve l&#8217;int\u00e9ress\u00e9 ou lorsque la d\u00e9livrance des documents de voyage est intervenue trop tardivement pour proc\u00e9der \u00e0 l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution de la d\u00e9cision d&#8217;\u00e9loignement ;<\/p>\n<p>b) de l&#8217;absence de moyens de transport.<\/p>\n<p>L&#8217;\u00e9tranger peut \u00eatre maintenu \u00e0 disposition de la justice dans les conditions pr\u00e9vues \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 742-2.<\/p>\n<p>Si le juge ordonne la prolongation de la r\u00e9tention, celle-ci court \u00e0 compter de l&#8217;expiration de la pr\u00e9c\u00e9dente p\u00e9riode de r\u00e9tention et pour une nouvelle p\u00e9riode d&#8217;une dur\u00e9e maximale de trente jours. La dur\u00e9e maximale de la r\u00e9tention n&#8217;exc\u00e8de alors pas soixante jours.<\/p>\n<p>La prolongation de la r\u00e9tention peut \u00eatre renouvel\u00e9e une fois, dans les m\u00eames conditions. La dur\u00e9e maximale de la r\u00e9tention n&#8217;exc\u00e8de alors pas quatre-vingt-dix jours.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000048446965\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 743-13 du Code de l&#8217;entr\u00e9e et du s\u00e9jour des \u00e9trangers et du droit d&#8217;asile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>\nLe magistrat du si\u00e8ge du tribunal judiciaire peut ordonner l&#8217;assignation \u00e0 r\u00e9sidence de l&#8217;\u00e9tranger lorsque celui-ci dispose de garanties de repr\u00e9sentation effectives.<\/p>\n<p>L&#8217;assignation \u00e0 r\u00e9sidence ne peut \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9e par le juge qu&#8217;apr\u00e8s remise \u00e0 un service de police ou \u00e0 une unit\u00e9 de gendarmerie de l&#8217;original du passeport et de tout document justificatif de son identit\u00e9, en \u00e9change d&#8217;un r\u00e9c\u00e9piss\u00e9 valant justification de l&#8217;identit\u00e9 et sur lequel est port\u00e9e la mention de la d\u00e9cision d&#8217;\u00e9loignement en instance d&#8217;ex\u00e9cution.<\/p>\n<p>Lorsque l&#8217;\u00e9tranger s&#8217;est pr\u00e9alablement soustrait \u00e0 l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution d&#8217;une d\u00e9cision mentionn\u00e9e \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 700-1, \u00e0 l&#8217;exception de son 4\u00b0, l&#8217;assignation \u00e0 r\u00e9sidence fait l&#8217;objet d&#8217;une motivation sp\u00e9ciale.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Par une ordonnance rendue le 28 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a statu\u00e9 sur une requ\u00eate en prolongation&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":4857,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cac536cdc6046d478b24dd","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cac536cdc6046d478b24dd","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cac536cdc6046d478b24dd","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Lyon","_kj_chambre":"J.L.D.","_kj_rg":"26\/01009","_kj_date":"2026-03-28","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1227575","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01009 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Par une ordonnance rendue le 28 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a statu\u00e9 sur une requ\u00eate en prolongation...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"zh_CN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Par une ordonnance rendue le 28 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a statu\u00e9 sur une requ\u00eate en prolongation...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-01T14:20:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stefanos-kogkas-9zo1-38VfCE-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"5443\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3287\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u4f5c\u8005\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 \u5206\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01009\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T14:20:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2096,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/stefanos-kogkas-9zo1-38VfCE-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01009\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-01T14:20:35+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01009 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/stefanos-kogkas-9zo1-38VfCE-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T14:20:35+00:00\",\"description\":\"Par une ordonnance rendue le 28 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a statu\u00e9 sur une requ\u00eate en prolongation...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/stefanos-kogkas-9zo1-38VfCE-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/stefanos-kogkas-9zo1-38VfCE-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":5443,\"height\":3287},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"zh-Hans\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/zh-hans\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01009 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Par une ordonnance rendue le 28 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a statu\u00e9 sur une requ\u00eate en prolongation...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\/","og_locale":"zh_CN","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01009","og_description":"Par une ordonnance rendue le 28 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a statu\u00e9 sur une requ\u00eate en prolongation...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-01T14:20:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":5443,"height":3287,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stefanos-kogkas-9zo1-38VfCE-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u4f5c\u8005":"Kohen","\u9884\u8ba1\u9605\u8bfb\u65f6\u95f4":"10 \u5206"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01009","datePublished":"2026-07-01T14:20:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\/"},"wordCount":2096,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stefanos-kogkas-9zo1-38VfCE-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01009","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-01T14:20:35+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01009 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stefanos-kogkas-9zo1-38VfCE-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-01T14:20:35+00:00","description":"Par une ordonnance rendue le 28 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a statu\u00e9 sur une requ\u00eate en prolongation...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"zh-Hans","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stefanos-kogkas-9zo1-38VfCE-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stefanos-kogkas-9zo1-38VfCE-unsplash.webp","width":5443,"height":3287},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01009\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"zh-Hans"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"zh-Hans","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/stefanos-kogkas-9zo1-38VfCE-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-59lB","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":498688,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-27-novembre-2025-n25-01530\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227575,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 27 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/01530","author":"Kohen","date":"2026\u5e744\u67088\u65e5","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a rend\u2026","rel":"","context":"\u5728\u201cD\u00e9cisions juridiques\u201d\u4e2d","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-uZDXjqtVifU-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":457287,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/caa-caa-de-lyon-15-01-2026-n-25ly01713\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227575,"position":1},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de LYON \u2013 15\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25LY01713","author":"Kohen","date":"2026\u5e744\u67087\u65e5","format":false,"excerpt":"Par un arr\u00eat rendu le 15 janvier 2026, la Cour adm\u2026","rel":"","context":"\u5728\u201cJuridictions administratives\u201d\u4e2d","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/sofia-vila-flor-iX4r2YviN8E-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/sofia-vila-flor-iX4r2YviN8E-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/sofia-vila-flor-iX4r2YviN8E-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/sofia-vila-flor-iX4r2YviN8E-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/sofia-vila-flor-iX4r2YviN8E-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/sofia-vila-flor-iX4r2YviN8E-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":457254,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/caa-caa-de-lyon-15-01-2026-n-25ly01943\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227575,"position":2},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de LYON \u2013 15\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25LY01943","author":"Kohen","date":"2026\u5e744\u67087\u65e5","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour administrative d'appel de Lyon, par un arr\u2026","rel":"","context":"\u5728\u201cJuridictions administratives\u201d\u4e2d","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/roman-suslov-7jSq1rrpku0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/roman-suslov-7jSq1rrpku0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/roman-suslov-7jSq1rrpku0-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/roman-suslov-7jSq1rrpku0-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/roman-suslov-7jSq1rrpku0-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/roman-suslov-7jSq1rrpku0-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1050797,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/cour-administrative-dappel-de-nancy-le-2-juin-2026-n25nc01939\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227575,"position":3},"title":"Cour administrative d&#8217;appel de Nancy, le 2 juin 2026, n\u00b025NC01939","author":"Kohen","date":"2026\u5e746\u67085\u65e5","format":false,"excerpt":"I. Le rejet du renouvellement de titre de s\u00e9jour a\u2026","rel":"","context":"\u5728\u201cJuridictions administratives\u201d\u4e2d","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-7Jdaf6S9UJY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-7Jdaf6S9UJY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-7Jdaf6S9UJY-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-7Jdaf6S9UJY-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-7Jdaf6S9UJY-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-7Jdaf6S9UJY-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":494432,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-octobre-2025-n20-00773\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227575,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 octobre 2025, n\u00b020\/00773","author":"Kohen","date":"2026\u5e744\u67088\u65e5","format":false,"excerpt":"Le p\u00f4le social du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, par\u2026","rel":"","context":"\u5728\u201cD\u00e9cisions juridiques\u201d\u4e2d","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/maximilian-zahn-SKf_POUVJnQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/maximilian-zahn-SKf_POUVJnQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/maximilian-zahn-SKf_POUVJnQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/maximilian-zahn-SKf_POUVJnQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/maximilian-zahn-SKf_POUVJnQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/maximilian-zahn-SKf_POUVJnQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":498027,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-lyon-le-27-novembre-2025-n2025f06466\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227575,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Lyon, le 27 novembre 2025, n\u00b02025F06466","author":"Kohen","date":"2026\u5e744\u67088\u65e5","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Lyon, le \u2026","rel":"","context":"\u5728\u201cD\u00e9cisions juridiques\u201d\u4e2d","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kateryna-hliznitsova-mbsL-olOezY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kateryna-hliznitsova-mbsL-olOezY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kateryna-hliznitsova-mbsL-olOezY-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kateryna-hliznitsova-mbsL-olOezY-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kateryna-hliznitsova-mbsL-olOezY-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kateryna-hliznitsova-mbsL-olOezY-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1227575","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1227575"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1227575\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4857"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1227575"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1227575"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/zh-hans\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1227575"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}