I will start by identifying the specific judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) based on the ruling provided, which involves the United Kingdom, Ireland, and the European Commission, in order to retrieve the facts and legal reasoning necessary for the commentary. I will search for the exact text of the ruling’s operative part to precisely identify the case and retrieve its full content. I will refine my search to find recent cases (2024-2025) where the United Kingdom, Ireland, and the Commission were involved and where the Court ordered Ireland and the Commission to bear their own costs, despite the UK’s action being dismissed. I will specifically search for the operative part of case C-591/22 P, involving the United Kingdom and the Commission, to verify if it matches the ruling provided by the user. I will check the operative part of Joined Cases C-555/22 P, C-556/22 P, and C-564/22 P (United Kingdom v Commission) to see if it matches the ruling provided, as these cases concern state aid and CFC rules. I will check the operative part and the ruling on costs of case C-465/20 P (Apple State Aid) to see if it matches the snippet provided, specifically looking for the costs allocated to the United Kingdom, Ireland, and the Commission. I will search for the exact text of the ruling’s operative part to identify the case, specifically looking for the phrasing « le recours est rejeté », the United Kingdom’s condemnation to costs, and the requirement for Ireland and the Commission to bear their own costs. I will search for the operative part of Joined Cases C-465/20 P and C-467/20 P (Apple State Aid) on the Curia website to confirm the cost distribution and see if it matches the user’s snippet. I will search for the operative part of Case C-591/22 P (United Kingdom v Commission) on Curia to see if it matches the ruling provided by the user. I will examine the logs in the .work/logs/ directory to find any mention of the case number or judgment details, which might provide the context needed for the commentary. I will read the notion_to_wordpress_cjue.log file to identify the titles of recently processed articles, which could reveal the judgment the user is referring to. I will search for « Royaume-Uni » in the logs to see if I can find a judgment involving the United Kingdom, which might lead me to the case the user is referring to. I will search for log entries around October 6, 2025, in notion_to_wordpress_cjue.log.1 to find the judgment synchronization date and identify the relevant case. I will search for the phrase « recours est rejeté » in the project files to locate any articles or logs that include this specific wording, which may help identify the case. I will examine the schema of the cjue_publications.db database to understand how to query it for the judgment details. I will conduct a more focused search on the Curia website for the exact phrase « L’Irlande et la Commission européenne supporteront leurs propres dépens » within judgments from 2024 and 2025 to identify the correct case. I will check the operative part of Case C-491/21 P (United Kingdom v Commission) to see if the cost distribution matches the snippet, as it was decided in September 2024. I will search for Case C-491/21 P directly to retrieve its full text and operative part. I will search for Case C-491/21 P specifically to ensure I find the correct appeal and its corresponding judgment. I will search for the exact wording of the operative part, specifically focusing on the Court’s declaration that the recourse is rejected and the United Kingdom’s condemnation to costs, to identify the specific judgment. I will search for the summary or press release of Case C-491/21 P (United Kingdom v Commission) to understand the legal reasoning and facts required for the commentary. I will search for Case C-491/21 P and « mancozeb » in English to find more detailed information and legal analysis. I will search for the operative part of Case C-491/21 P on the Curia website to confirm the details of the judgment and the parties involved. I will perform another search using the exact wording of the ruling to identify the case, as the previous search results were inconclusive. I will search for the full text of the judgment in Case C-491/21 P to extract specific quotes and legal reasoning for the commentary. I will search for the judgment « United Kingdom v European Commission (Mancozeb) » to find the correct case details and legal reasoning. I will search for Case T-746/20 to find the corresponding CJEU appeal judgment and its legal details. I will search for the operative part in English to precisely identify the case involving the United Kingdom, Ireland, and the European Commission. I will search for the appeal case number corresponding to the General Court decision T-746/20 to find the relevant CJEU judgment.
