I will first search for the full text of the CJUE decision mentioned in the prompt, using the provided operative part and synchronization date to identify the specific case and its legal context. I will examine the `notion_to_wordpress_cjue.log` file and the `cjue_publications.db` database to see if I can find the full text or the title of the decision associated with the synchronization date of October 6, 2025. I will read the last 100 lines of the `notion_to_wordpress_cjue.log` file to identify any recent activity or information about the decision. I will search for the string « 135 caractères » in all files in the current directory to see if I can find more context or the source of this short text. I will search for the phrase « le recours est rejeté » in all files to find any mentions or related logs. I will use `sqlite3` to examine the `cjue_publications.db` database and retrieve the most recent entries, which might provide clues about the decision. I will search the Curia website for CJUE decisions from 2025 that involve the European Commission, are in German, and have the operative part « le recours est rejeté. » I will search for the exact German operative part to find the specific CJUE case and its corresponding facts. I will read the last lines of the `notion_to_wordpress_cjue.log` file, starting from line 31,000, to see the most recent activity and identify any processed decisions. I will search for the phrase « le recours est rejeté » within the `cjue_publications.db` file to see if it is stored there. I will read the `generate_cjue_commentaire.py` script to understand the commentary generation process and how it handles short inputs. I will read the `cjue_commentaire_service.py` script to see if it provides additional context or how it interacts with the commentary generation. I will read the `cjue_commentaire_service.log` file from the `~/Library/Logs/` directory to see if I can find the metadata for the most recently processed decision. I will search for CJUE decisions rendered on October 6, 2025, to identify the case corresponding to the operative part provided in the prompt. I will search for the number « 135 » in all files within the directory to find any related logs or data. I will search for the date « 2025-10-06 » in all files within the directory to find any mentions or related logs. I will search for the date « 2025-10-06 » in the `notion_to_wordpress_cjue.log.1` file. I will search for CJUE decisions from September 2025 where the appeal was rejected, to find a case that matches the operative part. I will search for the exact wording « le recours est rejeté » and « Commission européenne est condamnée aux dépens » to find the specific case where both these conditions were met. I will search for CJUE decisions rendered on October 2, 2025, to find a case that matches the operative part. I will search for the exact German operative part to find cases where the Commission’s action was dismissed and it was ordered to pay costs. I will list the contents of the `/Users/kohen1/Codes/Wordpress/Gemini-CJUE/outputs` directory to see if any generated commentaries exist. I will search for the motifs of the case T-553/23 (Philippe Latombe v. European Commission) to see if they match the operative part in the prompt. I will search for CJUE decisions from 2025 where the appeal was rejected and the European Commission was ordered to pay costs. I will search for cases involving the Commission against Germany in 2025 to find a match for the operative part and the German language requirement. I will search for CJUE case C-135/24 to see if it matches the synchronization date and operative part. I will read the `notion_to_wordpress_cjue.log` file from line 30,000 to see the entries for today and identify any recently processed decisions. I will search for Case C-562/10 in the `notion_to_wordpress_cjue.log` file to see if it has been processed. I will search for the string « 562/10 » in the log files to find any mentions of the case.
