Supreme Court of Mauritius, 23 juin 2020, 2020 MOK 2 – SANS SOUCI Y v POLICE
SANS SOUCI Y v POLICE 2020 MOK 2 Cause No: 579/20 THE DISTRICT COURT OF MOKA In the matter of: Yoan Winley Sans Souci Applicant v Police Respondent RULING The applicant is provisionally charged with drug dealing contrary to section 30 of the Dangerous Drugs Act. He has applied to be released on bail, but the respondent has objected to...
2 min de lecture · 325 mots
SANS SOUCI Y v POLICE
2020 MOK 2
Cause No: 579/20
THE DISTRICT COURT OF MOKA
In the matter of: Yoan Winley Sans Souci Applicant v
Police Respondent RULING
The applicant is provisionally charged with drug dealing contrary to section 30 of the Dangerous Drugs Act. He has applied to be released on bail, but the respondent has objected to his request on the ground that he will commit other offences. He was legally assisted by Mr Seewooram of Counsel during the hearing.
In support of the case for the respondent, the enquiring officer has explained that the applicant was found in possession of 7.59 grams of cannabis valued at MUR 4,542 on 18 June 2020 when he proposed to sell the drugs to an undercover police officer. In addition, he has mentioned that the applicant has admitted the charge.
I note that the enquiring officer has asserted that the applicant will commit similar offences as drug dealing is a lucrative business. I also note that the applicant appears to be unemployed and has to cater for a child which means that he might be even more tempted to pursue this illegal activity. On the other side of the scale, he does not have any previous conviction for drug dealing, and he has not committed the present offence after having been admitted to bail.
In the circumstances, there is a reasonable risk that the applicant will commit other offences. I consider, however that the imposition of a reasonable surety will ensure that suck risk is maintained at a negligible level.
I accordingly release the applicant on bail on the condition that he furnishes a surety in the sum of MUR 25,000 in cash, and enters into a recognisance in the sum of MUR 50,000.
Navish Jheelan
Senior District Magistrate 23 June 2020
Sources officielles : consulter la page source · PDF officiel
Supreme Court of Mauritius – public domain
Articles similaires
A propos de cette decision
Décisions similaires
Maurice
Supreme Court of Mauritius
Supreme Court of Mauritius, 15 mai 2026, 2026 PMP 7 - Police v Ravi Kumar Seeborun
Police v Ravi Kumar Seeborun 2026 PMP 7 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF PAMPLEMOUSSES CN: 4868/25 In the matter of:- Police v Ravi Kumar Seeborun JUGMENT A. Introduction 1. The Accused stands charged with an offence of Driving without due care and attention in breach of Sections 123C (1)(a) and 52 Second Schedule of Road Traffic Act as amended. 2....
Maurice
Supreme Court of Mauritius
Supreme Court of Mauritius, 14 mai 2026, 2026 PMP 6 - Yoan Jonathan Attiow
Yoan Jonathan Attiow 2026 PMP 6 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF PAMPLEMOUSSES CN: 2613/20 In the matter of:- Police v Yoan Jonathan Atthiow JUGMENT A. Introduction 1. The Accused stands charged with an offence of Assaulting an agent of the civil authority in breach of Section 158 and 159 of the Criminal Code. 2. The information avers that on or...
Maurice
Supreme Court of Mauritius
Supreme Court of Mauritius, 13 mai 2026, 2026 SAV 67 - POLICE v K K MOHUR
Page 1 POLICE v K K MOHUR 2026 SAV 67 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAVANNE Cause No.: 1586/24 Police v/s Karan Kumar Mohur Judgment The accused stands charged with the offence of « Breach of Protection From Domestic Violence Act » in breach of Sections 2 and 13(2) of the Protection from Domestic Violence Act. As per the information...