Supreme Court of Mauritius, 25 juin 2020, 2020 MOK 3 – POLICE v AUCHARAZ R

POLICE v AUCHARAZ R 2020 MOK 3 Cause No: 5105/18 THE DISTRICT COURT OF MOKA In the matter of: Police v Ramesh Aucharaz JUDGMENT The accused is charged with insult in breach of section 296 of the Criminal Code. He was legally represented by Mr Ramchurn of Counsel during the trial and the proceedings were held in Creole. In support...

Source officielle PDF

2 min de lecture 362 mots

POLICE v AUCHARAZ R

2020 MOK 3

Cause No: 5105/18

THE DISTRICT COURT OF MOKA

In the matter of: Police

v

Ramesh Aucharaz JUDGMENT

The accused is charged with insult in breach of section 296 of the Criminal Code. He was legally represented by Mr Ramchurn of Counsel during the trial and the proceedings were held in Creole.

In support of the case for the prosecution, the alleged victim has related how his neighbour insulted him on 17 October 2017 at his place in Dagotière. On the other hand, the accused has denied the charge when he was questioned by the police, and he has exercised his right to silence during the proceedings in Court.

I have considered all the evidence on record. I am of the opinion that the prosecution has not proved its case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt for the reasons enunciated in the following paragraph.

First, the witness for the prosecution has stated that the accused uttered the words “trappe mo gogot” to his address on the material date, but Constable Amboorallee has mentioned that the alleged victim had reported to the police that the words “filmer mo gogot” were uttered to his address. I consider that even with the passage of time, the witness for the prosecution would have been expected to recall with more accuracy what was uttered to his address bearing in mind that he has claimed that he was mentally stressed as a result of the incident. Second, the alleged victim has stated that the accused was at a distance of 3 metres from him when he was insulted, but Constable Amboorallee has mentioned that the parties were at a distance of 10 metres from each other when the incident occurred. Third, the witness for the prosecution has admitted that he is not on good terms with the accused such that the possibility that the charge is the result of a false and malicious denunciation cannot be excluded.

I accordingly dismiss the charge against the accused.

Navish Jheelan Senior District Magistrate 25 June 2020


Supreme Court of Mauritius – public domain

A propos de cette decision

Décisions similaires

Maurice

Supreme Court of Mauritius

Divers EN

Supreme Court of Mauritius, 15 mai 2026, 2026 PMP 7 - Police v Ravi Kumar Seeborun

Police v Ravi Kumar Seeborun 2026 PMP 7 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF PAMPLEMOUSSES CN: 4868/25 In the matter of:- Police v Ravi Kumar Seeborun JUGMENT A. Introduction 1. The Accused stands charged with an offence of Driving without due care and attention in breach of Sections 123C (1)(a) and 52 Second Schedule of Road Traffic Act as amended. 2....

Maurice

Supreme Court of Mauritius

Divers EN

Supreme Court of Mauritius, 14 mai 2026, 2026 PMP 6 - Yoan Jonathan Attiow

Yoan Jonathan Attiow 2026 PMP 6 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF PAMPLEMOUSSES CN: 2613/20 In the matter of:- Police v Yoan Jonathan Atthiow JUGMENT A. Introduction 1. The Accused stands charged with an offence of Assaulting an agent of the civil authority in breach of Section 158 and 159 of the Criminal Code. 2. The information avers that on or...

Maurice

Supreme Court of Mauritius

Divers EN

Supreme Court of Mauritius, 13 mai 2026, 2026 SAV 67 - POLICE v K K MOHUR

Page 1 POLICE v K K MOHUR 2026 SAV 67 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAVANNE Cause No.: 1586/24 Police v/s Karan Kumar Mohur Judgment The accused stands charged with the offence of « Breach of Protection From Domestic Violence Act » in breach of Sections 2 and 13(2) of the Protection from Domestic Violence Act. As per the information...

Analyse stratégique offerte

Envoyez vos pièces. Recevez une stratégie.

Transmettez-nous les pièces de votre dossier. Maître Hassan KOHEN vous répond personnellement sous 24 heures avec une première analyse stratégique de votre situation.

  • Première analyse offerte et sans engagement
  • Réponse personnelle de l'avocat sous 24 heures
  • 100 % confidentiel, secret professionnel garanti
  • Jusqu'à 1 Go de pièces, dossiers et sous-dossiers acceptés

Cliquez ou glissez vos fichiers ici
Tous formats acceptes (PDF, Word, images, etc.)

Envoi en cours...

Vos donnees sont utilisees uniquement pour traiter votre demande. Politique de confidentialite.