Décisions de justice publiées par le cabinet
-
High Court (Commercial Court), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1249 (Comm)
1. This is the hearing of an appeal by the Appellant (“MWP”) from an Order of Mr Registrar Kay QC made as long ago as the 14 June 2018 by...
-
High Court (Queen's Bench Division), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1313 (QB)
Mr Justice Freedman: JUDGMENT IContents PARAGRAPH NUMBER SUBJECT I Contents 1-3 II Introduction 4-15 III The application for a WFO 16-21 IV The evidence of the Defendant 22-23 V The...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1286 (Ch)
1. This is the hearing of an application by the Defendant, Pyxis Capital Management Ltd (“Pyxis”), for a stay of proceedings pursuant to Article 29 of Regulation (EC) No. 1215/2012...
-
High Court (Family Division), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1301 (Fam)
The Honourable Mr Justice Cobb: Introduction 1. The application before the court, dated 13 January 2020 (and in re-amended form, dated 27 April 2020), is for an order that the...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWCA Civ 671
Sir Geoffrey Vos, Chancellor of the High Court: Introduction 1. This appeal raises two significant questions affecting the limitation period applicable to follow-on claims made in proceedings before the Competition...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1245 (Ch)
INTRODUCTION 1. This is a sad case. It is a dispute between a brother, on the one hand, and his sister and her husband, who are the First and Second...
-
High Court (Technology and Construction Court), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 985 (TCC)
1. In this action the Claimants (“the Harts”) now claim damages from the First Defendant (“Mr. Large”) arising out of alleged negligence in surveying and valuing a residential property situated...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1241 (Ch)
This judgment was handed down remotely by email to the parties and circulation to Bailii on 22 May 2020. The deemed time of hand-down is 10:00am on 22 May 2020....
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1254 (Admin)
Introduction 1. This is an extradition case, concerning the “retrial” entitlement in section 20(5) of the Extradition Act 2003 and evidence said to fill a “lacuna” in a European Arrest...
-
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWCA Crim 688
MR JUSTICE SPENCER: 1. This is a renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence following refusal by the single judge. 2. On 8 May 2019, in the...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1200 (Ch)
A) An Overview 1. This application claims under section 340 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (“the Act”) that a payment (“the Payment”) given by Mr Fowlds on 4 September 2014...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1304 (Ch)
Mr Justice Miles: Introduction 1. The Claimants seek an injunction restraining the Defendants until trial from publishing news stories referring to the monthly discount used by the Claimants as part...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1321 (Admin)
Double-click to enter the short title 1. The appellant has made an application for leave to appeal and for certification of a point of law of general public importance following...
-
High Court (Family Division), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1964 (Fam)
1. MRS JUSTICE LIEVEN: This is an application by the father for the summary return to Australia of two children: A, aged 8 years and 11 months, and B, aged...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1333 (Ch)
1. I have given judgment today dismissing the Claimants’ application for an injunction. The parties have helpfully agreed an order subject to (i) costs and (ii) the Claimants’ application for...
-
High Court (Technology and Construction Court), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 2443 (TCC)
1. The issue between the parties at this first CMC is whether disclosure model B or D should be used for disclosure issues 2 and 5. The parties have managed...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1327 (Ch)
(1) Was the quantification in 2008 of HeavyLift’s contribution to the joint venture fair and honest? ........................................................................................................................... 17 (2) What was the content of the representations to RAKIA in 2013...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1307 (Admin)
1. This is an appeal against conviction by way of case stated. The appellant, Stuart Jenkins (“Mr Jenkins”), challenges the decision of the lay justices (“the Magistrates”) sitting at Portsmouth...
-
High Court (Commercial Court), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 2198 (Comm)
1. This is an application for judgment in default for an anti-suit injunction and declaratory relief The bill of lading states that the shipper is Komatsu, that the consignee is...
-
High Court (Queen's Bench Division), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1312 (QB)
Mr Justice Warby: 1. The claimant brings this libel action in respect of an article (“the Article”) published in MailOnline, on the website www.dailymail.co.uk(“the Daily Mail website”) on 11 March...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1323 (Ch)
(1) EUROPEAN FILM BONDS A/S (2) ALLIANZ GLOBAL CORPORATE & SPECIALTY SE (3) ERGO VERSICHERUNG AG (4) KRAVAG-LOGISTIC VERSICHERUNGS-AG (5) BASLER SACHVERSICHERUNGS AG (6) AXA VERSICHERUNG AG (7) BAYERISCHER VERSICHERUNGSVERBAND...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1303 (Admin)
1. The Claimant, ClientEarth, applies under s. 118 of the Planning Act 2008 (“PA 2008”) for judicial review of the decision by the Defendant, the Secretary of State for Business,...
-
High Court (Commercial Court), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1315 (Comm)
1. These have been applications by three groups of Defendants challenging the jurisdiction of the court. Those groups may be described as: (1) ‘the Shell Defendants’, namely the First to...
-
High Court (Queen's Bench Division), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1306 (QB)
1. This claim arises from a motorbike accident that occurred at around 14.30 on 13 August 2014. That accident occurred at a track day organised by the Defendant at Oulton...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1298 (Admin)
1. The Claimant seeks judicial review of the screening direction made by the Defendant, on 6 August 2019, that an environmental impact assessment (“EIA”) was not required for the proposed...
-
High Court (Technology and Construction Court), 22 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1302 (TCC)
1. In this action, following trial I circulated a judgment dealing with the substantive issues in the action. That judgment was to be handed down on the 24th April 2020...
-
High Court (Queen's Bench Division), 21 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1289 (QB)
A. Introduction 1. The claimant has brought a claim in defamation, misuse of private information and harassment against the three defendants. The first and second defendants are sisters and the...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 21 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1392 (Admin)
1 I have decided to refuse the application for interim relief. I will now give my reasons for that decision. 2 This is a challenge to the Health Protection (Coronavirus...
-
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), 21 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWCA Crim 673
1. LORD JUSTICE HOLROYDE: Breach of a sexual harm prevention order ("SHPO") or a sexual offences prevention order ("SOPO") is an offence punishable with imprisonment. It is not however an...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 21 mai 2020, n° [2020] EWHC 1299 (Admin)
1. This is the judgment of the court, to which we have both contributed. 2. The Claimant was born in August 2011. He is a British national. His litigation friend...