Décisions de justice publiées par le cabinet
-
High Court (Technology and Construction Court), 18 апреля 2024, n° [2024] EWHC 954 (TCC)
Mrs Justice O'FarrellThursday, 18 April 2024 (15:02pm) Ruling by MRS JUSTICE O'FARRELL 1. This matter concerns Vale's application for Model C disclosure in relation to disclosure issue 14 as between...
-
Family Court (B - district and circuit judges), 18 апреля 2024, n° [2024] EWFC 138 (B)
HHJ PARKER: 1. This is an ex tempore judgment. The Court is concerned with the welfare of the child A, born 19 February 2023, currently aged 14 months. The local...
-
High Court (Technology and Construction Court), 18 апреля 2024, n° [2024] EWHC 952 (TCC)
Mrs Justice O'Farrell Thursday, 18 April 2024 (11:11am) Ruling by MRS JUSTICE O'FARRELL 1. Before the court is the claimants' application, dated 8 April 2024, seeking to extend the disclosure...
-
Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber), 18 апреля 2024, n° [2024] UKUT 126 (AAC)
1. The appeal is allowed to the extent of remittal. REASONS FOR DECISION A. Introduction 2. The appellant appeals to the Upper Tribunal against the DBS’s decision communicated in a...
-
High Court (Patents Court), 18 апреля 2024, n° [2024] EWHC 846 (Ch)
Mr Justice Richards: 1. This is my judgment on the following applications: i) the Defendants’ application of 5 December 2023 contesting jurisdiction as regards certain aspects of the Claimants’ claims...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 18 апреля 2024, n° [2024] EWCA Civ 376
1. In this case, the 134 claimants (the Claimants) issued a single claim form against Williams & Co Solicitors (the Solicitors). Each of the Claimants sought damages for breaches of...
-
Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber), 18 апреля 2024, n° [2024] UKUT 124 (AAC)
The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to dismiss the appeal. REASONS FOR DECISION Introduction 1. This is an appeal against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal of 16 September...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 18 апреля 2024, n° [2024] EWHC 855 (Admin)
Introduction 1. In this application for judicial review, which follows the Secretary of State for Justice’s (“SOS”) decision to recall the Claimant to prison on 1 February 2023, I am...
-
High Court (Technology and Construction Court), 18 апреля 2024, n° [2024] EWHC 1122 (TCC)
MRS JUSTICE JEFFORD: 1. There is before the court an application made by the claimants on 4 April for disclosure guidance pursuant to Practice Direction 57AD paragraph 11. The application,...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 апреля 2024, n° 1790/22.5T8TMR-A.E1.S1
Relator: FERNANDO BAPTISTA. I. O processo tutelar comum, ? um processo de jurisdi??o volunt?ria, nele se impondo como limite recurs?rio o Tribunal da Rela??o, sem preju?zo de admissibilidade do recurso...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 апреля 2024, n° 1019/06.3TBBJA-A.E1.S1
Relator: PAULA LEAL DE CARVALHO. I. N?o se verifica dupla conforme quanto ?s situa??es que correspondam ? viola??o de disposi??o processual no exerc?cio dos poderes do Tribunal da Rela??o relativamente...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 апреля 2024, n° 7963/21.0T8LSB.L1.S1
Relator: EMIDIO SANTOS. O dever de o juiz examinar criticamente as provas, a que se refere o n.? 4 do artigo 607.? do CPC, n?o implica o dever de o...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 апреля 2024, n° 303/22.3T8FNC-A.L1.S1
Relator: AFONSO HENRIQUE. I - A livran?a constitui uma garantia cartular t?pica que atribui ao avalista a obriga??o de responder solidariamente com o/a avalizado/a. II ? A invocada autoridade de...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 апреля 2024, n° 2118/21.7T8BRG.G1.S1
Relator: AFONSO HENRIQUE. I - O invocado erro de julgamento da Rela??o s? pode ser apreciado quando haja ofensa duma disposi??o expressa da lei que exija certa esp?cie de prova...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 апреля 2024, n° 864/15.3T8ABF.E1.S1
Relator: FERANDO BAPTISTA. I. Sendo a for?a probat?ria das per?cias apreciada livremente pelo tribunal, n?o pode o Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a pronunciar-se sobre o ju?zo relativo ? prova pericial, salvo...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 апреля 2024, n° 6271/23.7T8VNG.P1-A.S1
Relator: JO?O CURA MARIANO. Residindo a causa de pedir dos pedidos indemnizat?rios formulados na presente a??o popular, na pr?tica pela R? de um pre?o de venda de um produto superior...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 апреля 2024, n° 228/22.2T8LLE-A.E1.S1
Relator: JO?O CURA MARIANO. I. A interpreta??o do contrato ? decisiva para a qualifica??o do modo de extin??o do cr?dito acordada entre as partes, designadamente para sabermos se nos encontramos...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 апреля 2024, n° 903/19.9T8LSB.L1.S1.S3
Relator: JO?O CURA MARIANO. As situa??es de invalidez absoluta e definitiva, cobertas por contratos de seguro do Ramo Vida, em que nestes contratos se faz corresponder tais situa??es a uma...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 апреля 2024, n° 693/22.8T8PDL.L1.S1
Relator: CATARINA SERRA. A impugna??o de justifica??o notarial qualifica-se como uma ac??o de aprecia??o negativa, em que o impugnante deve alegar e demonstrar os fundamentos do seu pedido, designadamente que...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 апреля 2024, n° 6554/18.8T8FNC-B.L1.S1
Relator: CATARINA SERRA. Para que um pedido reconvencional seja admiss?vel ? preciso que se verifiquem os ?factores de conex?o? entre o pedido reconvencional e o pedido do autor (cfr. n.?...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 апреля 2024, n° 3581/16.3T8GMR.G2.S1
Relator: ANA PAULA LOBO. Quando num contrato de compra e venda de bem im?vel o destino a dar pelo comprador ao terreno vendido foi causa determinante da realiza??o da venda...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 апреля 2024, n° 35744/15.3T8LSB.E1.S1
Relator: JO?O CURA MARIANO. I - Nas situa??es de favorecimento ou contribui??o para uma exposi??o de terceiros a uma situa??o de perigo, a responsabilidade aquiliana residir? na viola??o de um...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 апреля 2024, n° 2932/20.0T8LSB.L1.S1
Relator: MARIA DA GRA?A TRIGO. I. Acompanha-se o entendimento das inst?ncias segundo o qual, ao contrato de presta??o de servi?os n?o tipificado dos autos, s?o aplic?veis as disposi??es legais relativas...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 апреля 2024, n° 320/23.6YRPRT-B.S1
Relator: VASQUES OS?RIO. I - O MDE ? definido no art. 1.?, n.? 1 da Lei n.? 65/2003, de 23-08 ? tem como ?nicos objectivos a deten??o e entrega da...
-
Bundesverfassungsgericht, 18 апреля 2024, n° 2 BvR 29/24
Erfolgreiche Verfassungsbeschwerde wegen Verletzung des Anspruchs auf freie Entfaltung der Persönlichkeit
-
Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa, 17 апреля 2024, n° 4271/23.6T8ALM.L1-4
Relator: GUILHERMINA FREITAS (PRESIDENTE). I - Encontrando-nos n?s perante uma decis?o proferida no ?mbito de uns autos de recurso de contraordena??o laboral, o prazo de interposi??o de recurso ? de...
-
Rechtbank Midden-Nederland, 17 апреля 2024, n° UTR 23/3027
WHT
-
Rechtbank Midden-Nederland, 17 апреля 2024, n° C/16/553031 / HA ZA 23-154
Tussen eiser en gedaagde sub 3 bestond een maatschapsovereenkomst. Deze overeenkomst is opgezegd. Partijen twisten over het bedrag dat aan eiser moet worden betaald. Eiser meent recht te hebben op...
-
Rechtbank Den Haag, 17 апреля 2024, n° C/09/651077 HA ZA 23-644
strafvorderlijk beslag o.g.v. artikel 94 Sv; betwistingsprocedure artikel 477a lid 2 Rv; betaling tijdens beslag, artikel 475 h lid 1
-
Rechtbank Rotterdam, 17 апреля 2024, n° C/10/656103 / HA ZA 23-355
onteigening: schadeloosstelling (o.b..v. overeenstemming tussen partijen)