Décisions de justice publiées par le cabinet
-
Tribunal du travail de Finlande, 18 мая 2022, n° 20098/03.04.02.02.00/2021
Ylityö- ja vuoronvaihtokiellon syynä oli ollut työntekijöiden tyytymättömyys työnantajan päätökseen olla välittömästi korottamatta ja neuvottelematta korotuksista hälytysrahaan ja sisäisen keikkailun korvauksiin määräaikaisen kesäajan hälytysrahakorotuksen päätyttyä. Työtaistelu kohdistui siten voimassa olevan...
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 18 мая 2022, n° 2021-00647
Cour supérieure de justice, 18 mai 2022, n° 2021-00647
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 18 мая 2022, n° 2022-00076
Cour supérieure de justice, 18 mai 2022, n° 2022-00076
-
High Court (Senior Court Costs Office), 18 мая 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1272 (SCCO)
Costs Judge Rowley: 1. This is an appeal by Newgate solicitors against the number of pages of prosecution evidence (“PPE”) allowed by the determining officer when calculating the appropriate fee...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 18 мая 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1220 (Ch)
MRS JUSTICE FALK: Introduction and background 1. This is an appeal by Tik Tok International Limited against a decision dated 16 December 2021 of June Ralph, the Hearing Officer for...
-
Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 18 мая 2022, n° [2022] UKUT 129 (LC)
Introduction 1. This is an appeal by the ratepayer against a decision of the Valuation Tribunal for England (“the VTE”), dated 1 February 2021, in which it dismissed an appeal...
-
High Court (Queen's Bench Division), 18 мая 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1124 (QB)
This judgment was handed down by the Judge remotely by circulation to the parties’ representatives by e-mail and release to The National Archives. The date and time for hand-down is...
-
First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber), 18 мая 2022, n° [2022] UKFTT 168 (TC)
Introduction 1. This is an appeal by Haymarket Media Group Limited against a notice of assessment to VAT dated 18 January 2019 in the sum of £17,000,000 for the period...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 18 мая 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1162 (Ch)
This judgment will be handed down by the Judge remotely by circulation to the parties or representatives by email and release to The National Archives. The date and time for...
-
High Court (Queen's Bench Division), 18 мая 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1108 (QB)
Mr Justice Lane : 1. On 10 December 2016, a football match took place at Motspur Park, London between the under 18 teams of Fulham Football Club and Swansea City...
-
High Court (Senior Court Costs Office), 18 мая 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1273 (SCCO)
Costs Judge Rowley: 1. This is an appeal by Philip Rule of counsel against the fees allowed to him in respect of an appeal to the Court of Appeal by...
-
Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber), 18 мая 2022, n° [2022] UKUT 139 (TCC)
Introduction and background 1. This decision deals with the appellants’ objection to HMRC raising two particular issues in its Rule 24 Rule 24 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules...
-
United Kingdom Supreme Court, 18 мая 2022, n° [2022] UKSC 13
SIR DECLAN MORGAN: (with whom Lord Hodge, Lord Hamblen, Lord Burrows and Lord Lloyd-Jones agree) 1. The appellant pleaded guilty at arraignment on charges of aggravated burglary and stealing, false...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 18 мая 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1149 (Admin)
Mr Justice Julian Knowles: Introduction 1. This is a renewed application for permission to appeal against the order for the Applicant’s extradition to Hungary following refusal on the papers by...
-
High Court (Queen's Bench Division), 18 мая 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1189 (QB)
Introduction 1 The background to this claim is described in a judgment handed down on 22 February 2022 and made public on 24 February 2022: [2022] EWHC 380 (QB) (“the...
-
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), 18 мая 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Crim 678
This judgment was handed down remotely by circulation to the parties' representatives by email and release to The National Archives. The date and time for hand-down is deemed to be...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 мая 2022, n° 388/20.7GDSTB.S1
Relator: HELENA FAZENDA. I - A opera??o de determina??o da medida concreta da pena tem de ser realizada em fun??o da culpa do agente ? que funciona, tamb?m, como limite...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 мая 2022, n° 98/18.5PATVR.E1.S1
Relator: HELENA FAZENDA. I - No que respeita ? decis?o sobre a pena, mormente a sua medida, o STJ tem reafirmado que os recursos n?o s?o re-julgamentos da causa, mas...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 мая 2022, n° 1537/20.0GLSNT.L1.S1
Relator: ANA BARATA BRITO. A sindicabilidade da medida concreta da pena em recurso abrange a determina??o da pena que desrespeite os princ?pios gerais respectivos, as opera??es de determina??o impostas por...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 мая 2022, n° 365/18.8PFPRT-A.S1
Relator: ANA BARATA BRITO. No iter aplicativo da pena, a atenua??o especial surge na fase da determina??o das penas parcelares, sendo esse o momento em que o tribunal pondera sobre...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 мая 2022, n° 85/15.5GEBRG.G1.S1
Relator: S?NIO ALVES. A discord?ncia relativamente ao ac?rd?o que determinou a rejei??o do recurso interposto, por inadmiss?vel, sendo leg?tima, n?o constitui fundamento de qualquer nulidade.
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 мая 2022, n° 2808/13.8TAVNG.P1.S1
Relator: S?NIO ALVES. I - A omiss?o de pron?ncia constitui um v?cio da decis?o que se verifica quando o tribunal se n?o pronuncia sobre quest?es cujo conhecimento a lei lhe...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 мая 2022, n° 106/20.0KRCBR.C1.S1
Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I - Entende a recorrente que o ac?rd?o recorrido enferma, no que concerne ? fixa??o da pena ?nica, de falta de fundamenta??o, o que consubstancia nulidade do...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 мая 2022, n° 48/17.6GCALM.L1-A.S1
Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I - O ?mbito do presente recurso cinge-se ? mat?ria c?vel (art. 403.?, n.? 2, al. b), do CPP). II - Pretende a recorrente que seja admitida...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 мая 2022, n° 3/15.0IFLSB.L1.S1
Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I - Disp?e o art. 400.?, n.? 3, do CPP; ?mesmo que n?o seja admiss?vel recurso quanto ? mat?ria penal, pode ser interposto recurso da parte da...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 мая 2022, n° 2711/20.5T8STR.E1.S1
Relator: LOPES DA MOTA. I - Sendo a data do tr?nsito em julgado da primeira condena??o o momento temporal a ter em conta (ac?rd?o de fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia n.? 9/2016,...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 мая 2022, n° 37/20.3PJLRS-A.S1
Relator: PEDRO BRANQUINHO DIAS. I. A provid?ncia do Habeas corpus tem natureza extraordin?ria e ? independente do sistema de recursos penais. II. Em conson?ncia com a sua matriz hist?rica, deve...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 мая 2022, n° 1649/19.3JAPRT-A.S1
Relator: TERESA F?RIA. I - O peticionante fundamenta o seu pedido de concess?o da provid?ncia de Habeas corpus na invoca??o da ilegalidade da sua reclus?o, por, em seu entender, esta...
-
Bundesgerichtshof, 18 мая 2022, n° VII ZB 40/21
Tenor Die Rechtsbeschwerde der Kläger gegen den Beschluss des 15. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts München vom 15. Juni 2021 wird auf Kosten der Kläger als unzulässig verworfen. Gegenstandswert: bis 25.000 €...
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 18 мая 2022, n° 2021-01012
Cour supérieure de justice, 18 mai 2022, n° 2021-01012