Décisions de justice publiées par le cabinet
-
High Court (Queen's Bench Division), 3 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 180 (QB)
MR JUSTICE FORDHAM : 1. The purpose of today’s hearing is for me to consider whether the proposed settlement of the damages claim in this case is in the best...
-
High Court (Queen's Bench Division), 3 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 170 (QB)
1. On the morning of 17 November 2020, the BBC made a video and audio recording of half a day’s hearing in the Planning Court before Holgate J. The Judge...
-
High Court (Commercial Court), 3 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 164 (Comm)
1. The court is concerned with an application by the Second Defendant (“Mr Belyaev”) dated 14 September 2020 to vary a post-judgment worldwide freezing order made by Bryan J on...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 3 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 171 (Ch)
1. I have heard the trial of two closely related Part 8 claims: FL-2020-000023 (“the Injunctions Claim”) and CR-2020-003605 (“the BMFH Claim”). In very broad terms the Claimants say that...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 3 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 192 (Ch)
1. Following receipt of a statutory demand dated 7 May 2020, the Applicant applied on 4 June 2020 to restrain the Respondent from presenting a winding-up petition. Background 2. The...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 3 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 188 (Ch)
Mr Justice Morgan Wednesday, 3 February 2021 (11.00 am) Judgment by MRJUSTICEMORGAN 1. This is an application by the claimant to join a Mr Dikautschitsch as a third defendant to...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 3 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWCA Civ 104
1. At the heart of this caseis a question of policy interpretation. Such questions have become familiar work for the Planning Court, and this court too, since the publication of...
-
High Court (Commercial Court), 3 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 173 (Comm)
1. This is an application by the Claimant (‘Devonshires’) for summary judgment in respect of its claim for fees against the Defendants, who are former clients. The Parties 2. Devonshires...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 3 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWHC 176 (Ch)
1. This judgment deals with a discrete point concerning legal professional privilege and, more particularly, whether that privilege has been waived. The issue was raised at the Costs and Case...
-
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), 3 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWCA Crim 107
1. Given there is a single issue which links these conjoined appeals, it is useful to provide at the outset a brief overview of the circumstances of each case, together...
-
High Court (Family Division), 3 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWFC 8
Mr Justice Mostyn: 1. In this judgment I shall refer to the applicant as “the mother” and to the respondent as “the father”. 2. On 11 September 2020 the mother...
-
High Court (Family Division), 3 февраля 2021, n° [2021] EWFC 13
MR JUSTICE COHEN: 1 I am today dealing with an application by Mr Hussain, the former husband (“the husband”), for permission to appeal out of time an order made in...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 3 февраля 2021, n° 99/16.8JELSB.L1.S1
Relator: S?NIO ALVES. I - N?o tendo o Tribunal da Rela??o conhecido do recurso interposto de decis?o interlocut?ria, por entender ser irrecorr?vel a decis?o impugnada, da decis?o do Tribunal da...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 3 февраля 2021, n° 3665/10.1TXLSB-W.S1
Relator: S?NIO ALVES. I - O recurso extraordin?rio de decis?o proferida contra jurisprud?ncia fixada apenas pode ser interposto ap?s o tr?nsito em julgado da mesma. II - Interposto recurso de...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 3 февраля 2021, n° 125/18.6PBVLS-A.S1
Relator: TERESA F?RIA. RECURSO DE REVIS?O PRESSUPOSTOS REINCID?NCIA MAT?RIA DE FACTO IMPROCED?NCIA
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 3 февраля 2021, n° 56/17.7JAPRT.G1-A.S1
Relator: PAULO FERREIRA DA CUNHA. I - N?o ? apenas no caso de recurso para fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia que se deve proceder ? compara??o entre Ac?rd?os. Tamb?m o recurso de...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 3 февраля 2021, n° 1066/15.4JABRG.G1-A.S1
Relator: PAULO FERREIRA DA CUNHA. I. O problema que se p?e na oposi??o que deve verificar-se entre Ac?rd?os para a considera??o da ocorr?ncia da necessidade de fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia n?o...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 3 февраля 2021, n° 4038/18.3JAPRT.P1.S1
Relator: NUNO GON?ALVES. I - O assistente pode impugnar qualquer decis?o judicial recorr?vel que afete os seus direitos ou interesses leg?timos. II - O interesse do moderno Estado de Direito...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 3 февраля 2021, n° 1473/19.3S6LSB.S1
Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I - A medida da pena conjunta deve definir-se entre um m?nimo imprescind?vel ? estabiliza??o das expetativas comunit?rias e um m?ximo consentido pela culpa do agente. II...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 3 февраля 2021, n° 1070/13.7TAVNG-A.S1
Relator: GABRIEL CATARINO. CONHECIMENTO SUPERVENIENTE C?MULO JUR?DICO FALSIFICA??O BURLA DETEN??O DE ARMA PROIBIDA
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 3 февраля 2021, n° 3918/19.7T8STS.S1
Relator: OLINDO GERALDES. I. A decis?o transitada em julgado resolve definitivamente a quest?o da compet?ncia em raz?o do territ?rio. II. Existindo duas decis?es contradit?rias transitadas em julgado, ? de cumprir...
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 3 февраля 2021, n° 2020-00386
Cour supérieure de justice, 3 février 2021, n° 2020-00386
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 3 февраля 2021, n° 2020-00668
Cour supérieure de justice, 3 février 2021, n° 2020-00668
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 3 февраля 2021, n° 2021-00012
Cour supérieure de justice, 3 février 2021, n° 2021-00012
-
Cour suprême de Finlande, 3 февраля 2021, n° R2019/486
Rahapeliyhdistys oli tehnyt asiakkaansa pelaamisesta rahanpesuilmoituksen keskusrikospoliisin rahanpesun selvittelykeskukseen. Rahanpesuilmoituksen mukaan asiakas oli pelannut rahapelejä käytettävissä olleisiin varoihinsa nähden suurilla summilla, hän työskenteli kirjanpitäjänä ja hänellä oli pääsy asiakkaidensa rahavaroihin....
-
Cour suprême de Finlande, 3 февраля 2021, n° R2018/861
A hade skickat talrika textmeddelanden till B. A dömdes för brott mot besöksförbud, olaga hot och olaga förföljelse. B hade yrkat på straff åt A även för brott mot kommunikationsfrid....
-
Cour suprême d'Algérie, 3 февраля 2021, n° 1431464
رقم القرار: 1431464 تاريخ القرار: 2021/02/03 الموضوع: طلاق الأطراف: الطاعن:(د.م) / المطعون ضده: (ح.ل) الكلمات الأساسية: طلاق قبل البناء- طلاق بعد البناء- دخول. المرجع القانوني: المادتان 16 و48 من قانون...
-
Cour de cassation, 3 февраля 2021, n° 24857/2021
Arrêt de cassation n ° 24857 du 03-02-2021 : Statut personnel - principe de proportionnalité - garde - Tunisie
-
Cour de cassation, 3 февраля 2021, n° 313674/2021
Arrêt de cassation n° 313674 du 03 février 2021 : Contrat de promesse de vente | Transfert de propriété d’un bien immeuble | Enregistrement d’un acte de promesse de vente...
-
Cour de cassation, 3 февраля 2021, n° 313682/2021
Arrêt de cassation n° 313682 du 03 février 2021 : Arrêté de taxation d’office | Acte de reconnaissance de dette | Augmentation de capital | Nul ne peut se constituer...