Alpha Global Limited v The Pensions Regulator
1. On 16th September 2024 an “appeal” was received from the Appellant company. The documentation provided was incomplete in that it did not include the decision to be appealed and lacked detail. Consequently the “appeal” was referred to a Tribunal Legal Officer, on 23rd September 2024, who indicated that without further details the Appeal could not be commenced. The Appellant...
2 min de lecture · 301 mots
1. On 16th September 2024 an “appeal” was received from the Appellant company. The documentation provided was incomplete in that it did not include the decision to be appealed and lacked detail. Consequently the “appeal” was referred to a Tribunal Legal Officer, on 23rd September 2024, who indicated that without further details the Appeal could not be commenced. The Appellant was informed accordingly. 2. No further details were supplied indeed no contact was received from the Appellant by 18th December 2024 and Case Management Directions followed indicating if a copy of the decision to be appealed was not received by 7th January 2025 the case may be struck out. 3. The Appellant has made no further contact with the Tribunal. 4. By virtue of paragraph 8(3) of The Tribunal Procedure (First Tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009, the Tribunal make strike out a party’s case, in whole or in part, where: a. the appellant has failed to comply with a direction which stated that failure by the appellant to comply with the direction could lead to the striking out of the proceedings or part of them; b. the appellant has failed to co-operate with the Tribunal to such an extent that the Tribunal cannot deal with the proceedings fairly and justly; or c. the Tribunal considers there is no reasonable prospect of the appellant's case, or part of it, succeeding. 5. Here the Appellant has failed to provide the necessary documentation to commence the Appeal, it has failed to co-operate with the proceedings and therefore there is no reasonable prospect of the case succeeding. 6. The Appeal is therefore struck out with immediate effect. Signed: HH Judge David Dixon Date: 28th May 2025
Sources officielles : consulter la page source
Open Justice Licence (The National Archives).
Articles similaires
A propos de cette decision
Décisions similaires
Royaume-Uni
First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) – Information Rights
Beacon Counselling Trust v The Information Commissioner & Anor
Introduction to the Appeal 1. On 23 May 2024, the Appellant submitted a request (“the Request”) to the Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (“the Trust”) for copies of correspondence making reference to the Appellant, which had been sent to or from a named person at the Trust from 1 February 2023 to the date of the Request. 2....
Royaume-Uni
High Court (Chancery Division)
Kalaivani Jaipal Kirishani v George Major
Sir Anthony Mann : Introduction 1. This is an appeal from an order of HHJ Gerald sitting in the County Court at Central London dated 23rd December 2024 in which he dismissed two of three claims made by Ms Kirishana as claimant against her former cohabitee Mr Major. The claims were for a contribution to household and other domestic expenses,...
Royaume-Uni
High Court (Insolvency and Companies List)
Joanna Rich v JDDR Capital Limited
ICC JUDGE AGNELLO KC: Introduction 1. This is the judgment in relation to an application to set aside a statutory demand against Mrs Joanna Rich (Mrs Rich) and a petition against Mr Clive Rich (Mr Rich) relating to the same debt claimed under a personal guarantee provided by them in relation to a loan granted to LawBit Limited (Lawbit). Mr...