In the matter of Petropavlovsk plc (in administration)

JONATHAN HILLIARD QC sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court: Introduction 1. By Application Notice dated 27 July 2022, Allister Jonathan Manson, Trevor Binyon and Joanne Rolls (the “Administrators”), the joint administrators of Petrapavlovsk plc, seek a direction pursuant to paragraph 63 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 providing them with liberty to proceed with the...

Source officielle

2 min de lecture 384 mots

JONATHAN HILLIARD QC sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court: Introduction 1. By Application Notice dated 27 July 2022, Allister Jonathan Manson, Trevor Binyon and Joanne Rolls (the “Administrators”), the joint administrators of Petrapavlovsk plc, seek a direction pursuant to paragraph 63 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 providing them with liberty to proceed with the sale of the Company’s business to UMMC-INVEST (the “Application”). 2. The Application is extremely urgent, so it was listed for hearing before me on 29 July. I heard the matter for a little over half a day and indicated at the end of the hearing that I would provide a decision on Monday, with substantive reasons to follow. The Administrators indicated through Mr Arden QC that they were content with this course. I was provided with an updated draft order reflecting changes that I referred to at the hearing on Friday. 3. My decision is that I grant the Application. I will set out the reasons for this in a further, longer written judgment (the “Substantive Judgment”). I intend to hand down that further judgment later this week. 4. As to the terms of the order, I am content to make the order in the terms sought in the updated draft order, with the following adjustments: (1) An additional recital should be added in the following terms: “And upon the urgency of the Application requiring an order to be made forthwith with a judgment setting out the written reasons to be handed down subsequently.” (2) Wording should be added to the recitals to make clear that the Office of Sanctions Implementation provided a letter on 28 July that was put before the Court. (3) A paragraph should be added to the order adjourning- subject to further order of the Court- any consequential matters arising in relation to this order to the hand down of the judgment setting out the written reasons. This is in case the Administrators or any interested party wish to make any applications in relation to the order on hand down of the Substantive Judgment, or any consequential matters arise out of my order. 5. I therefore make an order in the terms appended to this judgment.


Open Justice Licence (The National Archives).

A propos de cette decision

Décisions similaires

Royaume-Uni

First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) – Information Rights

Fiscal EN

Beacon Counselling Trust v The Information Commissioner & Anor

Introduction to the Appeal 1. On 23 May 2024, the Appellant submitted a request (“the Request”) to the Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (“the Trust”) for copies of correspondence making reference to the Appellant, which had been sent to or from a named person at the Trust from 1 February 2023 to the date of the Request. 2....

Royaume-Uni

High Court (Chancery Division)

Fiscal EN

Kalaivani Jaipal Kirishani v George Major

Sir Anthony Mann : Introduction 1. This is an appeal from an order of HHJ Gerald sitting in the County Court at Central London dated 23rd December 2024 in which he dismissed two of three claims made by Ms Kirishana as claimant against her former cohabitee Mr Major. The claims were for a contribution to household and other domestic expenses,...

Royaume-Uni

High Court (Insolvency and Companies List)

Commercial EN

Joanna Rich v JDDR Capital Limited

ICC JUDGE AGNELLO KC: Introduction 1. This is the judgment in relation to an application to set aside a statutory demand against Mrs Joanna Rich (Mrs Rich) and a petition against Mr Clive Rich (Mr Rich) relating to the same debt claimed under a personal guarantee provided by them in relation to a loan granted to LawBit Limited (Lawbit). Mr...

Analyse stratégique offerte

Envoyez vos pièces. Recevez une stratégie.

Transmettez-nous les pièces de votre dossier. Maître Hassan KOHEN vous répond personnellement sous 24 heures avec une première analyse stratégique de votre situation.

  • Première analyse offerte et sans engagement
  • Réponse personnelle de l'avocat sous 24 heures
  • 100 % confidentiel, secret professionnel garanti
  • Jusqu'à 1 Go de pièces, dossiers et sous-dossiers acceptés

Cliquez ou glissez vos fichiers ici
Tous formats acceptes (PDF, Word, images, etc.)

Envoi en cours...

Vos donnees sont utilisees uniquement pour traiter votre demande. Politique de confidentialite.