Décisions de justice publiées par le cabinet
-
Hoge Raad, 25 февраля 2022, n° 21/03643
Prejudiciële vraag (art. 392 Rv). Wet homologatie onderhands akkoord (WHOA). Art. 369 lid 4 Fw. Is de WHOA van toepassing op vorderingen van bedrijfstakpensioenfondsen voor achterstallige pensioenpremies?
-
Rechtbank Den Haag, 25 февраля 2022, n° NL21.17779
Asiel, Vietnam, aanvraag kennelijk ongegrond, niet zo snel mogelijk asiel gevraagd, geen persoonlijke problemen, algemene misstanden, bijzondere procedurele waarborgen, onderzoek MediFirst, vermogen om te verklaren over asielmotieven, iMMO-onderzoek niet afgewacht
-
Rechtbank Rotterdam, 25 февраля 2022, n° ROT 20/5031, 20/5946, 20/6345
Boetes opgelegd aan een slachthuis omdat vlees niet werd beschermd tegen condens, omdat karkassen tegen elkaar aankwamen en omdat schietgaten in runderkoppen niet waren afgesloten.
-
Hoge Raad, 25 февраля 2022, n° 21/00553
Art. 81 lid 1 RO. Arbeidsrecht. Ontbinding op verzoek werkgever op de g-grond. Afwijzing verzoek werknemer om toekenning billijke vergoeding. Klachten op beide onderdelen.
-
Cour suprême administrative de Finlande, 25 февраля 2022, n° 20717/2020
B hade dömts för grov oredlighet som gäldenär till åtta månader villkorligt fängelse. Hen hade 1.1.2013 - 13.12.2016 verkat som styrelsemedlem och verkställande direktör i ett aktiebolag och de facto...
-
Tribunal d'arrondissement, 25 февраля 2022, n° 2022-00176
Tribunal d'arrondissement, 25 février 2022, n° 2022-00176
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Civ 236
LORD JUSTICE WARBY: 1. This is an application for relief from sanctions following the dismissal of an appeal for non-compliance with an unless order. If relief is granted, the appellant...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Civ 201
LORD JUSTICE COULSON : 1. Introduction 1. A non-lawyer would look at the procedural tangle that this case finds itself in, and be horrified at the muddle, and the time...
-
High Court (Commercial Court), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1711 (Comm)
(Remote Hearing) MRS JUSTICE COCKERILL: 1 Despite Mr Hossain’s very clear and reassuring and skilful arguments, I am going to grant permission to appeal in relation to grounds 2 to...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Civ 232
Lord Justice Newey and Sir Launcelot Henderson : I.Introduction and background 1. This appeal raises issues about the period of limitation applicable to a claim brought in the High Court...
-
High Court (Family Division), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 396 (Fam)
Mr Justice Peel : 1. The child who is the subject of these 1980 Hague Convention proceedings is 7 years old; I shall refer to him as “Z”. The application...
-
Employment Appeal Tribunal, 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EAT 36
SUMMARY UNFAIR DISMISSAL For the purposes of the law of unfair dismissal, section 95(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996 provides that the concept of dismissal includes a case in which the...
-
High Court (Planning Court), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 390 (Admin)
Mr. Justice Holgate: Introduction 1. On 12 November 2018 the defendant, Canterbury City Council (“CCC”) granted outline planning permission (“the OPP”) on land at Cockering Farm, Thanington, a site lying...
-
Employment Appeal Tribunal, 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EAT 32
(1) the ET’s finding that the allegations as a whole were made in good faith could not be reconciled with the finding that she had exaggerated and distorted matters and...
-
Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] UKUT 57 (AAC)
The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal made on 5 November 2020 under number SC322/19/02588 was made in error of...
-
Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] UKUT 50 (LC)
Introduction 1. The issue in this appeal is whether a former office building occupied by “property guardians” was a house in multiple occupation (HMO), applying the standard test in section...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 404 (Admin)
MR TIM SMITH (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge): Introduction. 1. This claim concerns a challenge to the grant of planning permission by the Defendant. The planning permission in...
-
First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] UKFTT 148 (TC)
Introduction 1. With the consent of the parties, the form of the hearing was a video hearing using the Tribunal video platform/etc. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it...
-
High Court (Commercial Court), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 409 (Comm)
Mrs Justice Cockerill: (A) INTRODUCTION (B) BACKGROUND (i) Factual Background (1) The Policy (2) COVID-19 Pandemic and Associated Restrictions (3) The Claim under the Policy (ii) Legal Background (1) FCA...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Civ 233
LORD JUSTICE COULSON : Background Matters 1. On 16 February 2022, I heard the oral application for permission to appeal against the orders of Mr Justice Cavanagh (“the judge”) dated...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Civ 229
Covid 19 Protocol: This judgment was handed down remotely by circulation to the parties' representatives by email and release to Bailii. The date for hand-down is deemed to be on...
-
High Court (Queen's Bench Division), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 411 (QB)
Mrs Justice Collins Rice: Introduction 1. There is considerable litigation history between the parties. It has its origins in events in 2017. The Respondent was a newly-qualified solicitor employed and...
-
High Court (Commercial Court), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 799 (Comm)
JUDGE PELLING: 1 The issue I now have to resolve concerns the cost of and occasioned by an application for security. 2 The circumstances leading to this particular hearing are...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Civ 231
Lord Justice Males: 1. This appeal arises out of negligent misrepresentations concerning the vessel’s fuel consumption made by the Owner of the VLCC “C CHALLENGER” during negotiations for a two-year...
-
High Court (Business List), 25 февраля 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1236 (Ch)
1. THE MASTER: At the moment, I am not going to order an issue for disclosure in terms of issue 18, either as formulated in the DRD that is actually...
-
Raad van State, 24 февраля 2022, n° 202100625/1/V3
Bij besluiten van 23 december 2020 heeft de staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid aanvragen van de vreemdelingen om hun een verblijfsvergunning asiel voor bepaalde tijd te verlenen opnieuw niet in...
-
Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa, 24 февраля 2022, n° 74/19.0YUSTR.L1-PICRS
Relator: CARLOS M. G. DE MELO MARINHO. I.?N?o se aplicam directamente aos processos de contra-ordena??o os princ?pios constitucionais do processo penal (ou, dizendo conforme antes descrito, n?o tem aplica??o, no...
-
Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa, 24 февраля 2022, n° 71/18.3YUSTR-M.L1-PICRS
Relator: ANA M?NICA MENDON?A PAV?O. A apreens?o de mensagens de correio electr?nico efectuada em buscas levadas a cabo pela Autoridade da Concorr?ncia no ?mbito de processo contraordenacional encontra suporte no...
-
Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa, 24 февраля 2022, n° 3553/19.6T9LSB.L1-9
Relator: MARGARIDA VIEIRA DE ALMEIDA. I-Uma vez que os ju?zos e considera??es ofensivos da honra e considera??o do assistente lhe foram dirigidos por causa do exerc?cio das fun??es de Ministro/Juiz...
-
Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa, 24 февраля 2022, n° 157/21.7PGCSC.L1-9
Relator: MARIA DO ROS?RIO SILVA MARTINS. I?A pr?tica do crime de condu??o de ve?culo em estado de embriaguez apenas pode ser provada atrav?s de prova pericial, mais propriamente, um teste...