Décisions de justice publiées par le cabinet
-
Rechtbank Den Haag, 19 октября 2022, n° C/09/597131 / HA ZA 20-765
Vorderingen tot betaling van een vergoeding voor het aanbrengen van een project op grond van een tussen partijen gesloten overeenkomst.
-
High Court (Family Division), 19 октября 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 2650 (Fam)
Deputy High Court Judge Richard Todd KC: 1. These proceedings concern E who is 17 years of age. There are two applications before the Court: (i) The Local Authority’s application...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 19 октября 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 2635 (Admin)
LADY JUSTICE MACUR : Introduction 1. This is an appeal by way of case stated against the decision of District Judge (Magistrates’ Courts) David Wilson (“the Judge”) made on the...
-
High Court (King's Bench Division), 19 октября 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 2618 (KB)
Senior Master Fontaine : 1. This judgment concerns the costs of the BLJ Claimants’ application dated 5 April 2022 and is ancillary to the judgment relating to issues heard at...
-
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), 19 октября 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Crim 1358
1. On 25 January 2022 at the Crown Court sitting at Leicester, following a trial before the Honorary Recorder of Leicester (the judge), Chay Bowskill was convicted of controlling and...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 19 октября 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 2631 (Admin)
Mrs Justice Collins Rice : Introduction 1. Mr Petr Olegovich Aven is a Russian and Latvian national, and long-term UK resident. He has substantial financial interests and assets, here and...
-
High Court (Senior Court Costs Office), 19 октября 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 2837 (SCCO)
Costs Judge Nagalingam: 1. The appeals, to a limited extent, have been successful for the reasons set out below. The appropriate additional payment, to which should be added the sum...
-
United Kingdom Supreme Court, 19 октября 2022, n° [2022] UKSC 27
LORD BRIGGS (with whom Lady Arden and Lady Rose agree) 1. “One day my son, all this will be yours”. Spoken by a farmer to his son when in his...
-
Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 19 октября 2022, n° [2022] UKUT 262 (LC)
Introduction 1. This is an unopposed appeal by the Valuation Officer (“the VO”), Catherine Bower, against a decision of the Valuation Tribunal for England (“the VTE”) dated 10 January 2022...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 19 октября 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Civ 1340
Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing: Introduction 1. The Appellant (‘A’) appeals against a decision of HHJ Hellman (‘the Judge’). The Judge dismissed A’s appeal made under section 204 of the Housing...
-
High Court (Insolvency and Companies List), 19 октября 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 2861 (Ch)
1. THE DEPUTY JUDGE: 2. This is the judgment on various issues which remained outstanding on the scope of the final order during the hearing on 19 October 2022. It...
-
High Court (Intellectual Property List), 19 октября 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 2637 (Ch)
MR JUSTICE MARCUS SMITH: 1. At a case management conference that took place on 26 and 27 July 2022, See my decision under Neutral Citation Number [2022] EWHC 2308 (Ch)....
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 19 октября 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 2621 (Admin)
Mrs Justice Lang : 1. This is a civil appeal by way of case stated against the decision of Deputy District Judge Warner (“the Judge”), in the Stratford Magistrates Court,...
-
First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) – Information Rights, 19 октября 2022, n° [2022] UKFTT 375 (GRC)
On hearing Mr Leo Davidson, counsel, on behalf of the Appellant and Mr Philip Coppel QC Now KC, following the accession of the King , leading counsel, on behalf of...
-
High Court (Planning Court), 19 октября 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 2632 (Admin)
James Strachan KC (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court): Introduction 1. By claim form dated 28 April 2021, the Claimant challenges the lawfulness of a decision of...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 19 октября 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Civ 1339
Lord Justice Phillips: 1. On 18 March 2022 HHJ Pearce, sitting as a Judge of the High Court (“the judge”), made an order declaring that the respondent had validly rejected...
-
United Kingdom Supreme Court, 19 октября 2022, n° [2022] UKSC 28
LADY ROSE (with whom Lord Reed, Lord Briggs, Lord Sales and Lord Leggatt agree): 1. Introduction 1. The respondent, NHS Lothian Health Board (“NHS Lothian”), is one of a number...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 19 октября 2022, n° 151/21.8YRPRT.S1-A
Relator: NUNO PINTO OLIVEIRA. A escritura p?blica declarat?ria de uni?o est?vel celebrada no Brasil n?o constitui uma decis?o revestida de for?a de caso julgado que recaia sobre direitos privados; da?...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 19 октября 2022, n° 933/15.0T8AVR.P1.S1-A
Relator: LU?S ESP?RITO SANTO. A cl?usula contratual geral inserta em contrato de seguro, mesmo facultativo, em que se define o sinistro ?inc?ndio? como ?combust?o acidental?, n?o cobre, no seu ?mbito...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 19 октября 2022, n° 759/18.9T8CVL.C2-A.S1
Relator: M?RIO BELO MORGADO. I- Ainda que a Rela??o tenha confirmado a decis?o recorrida quanto ? mat?ria de direito, n?o se verifica dupla conformidade nos casos em que tenha sido...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 19 октября 2022, n° 3807/20.9T8MTS.P1.S1
Relator: DOMINGOS JOS? DE MORAIS. I- O acordo de isen??o de hor?rio de trabalho deve ser reduzido a escrito, constituindo formalidade ad substantiam. II- O acordo verbal ? nulo, mas...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 19 октября 2022, n° 82/21.1T8PTG.E1.S2
Relator: RAMALHO PINTO. I- H? contradi??o entre dois ac?rd?os da Rela??o, para efeitos do disposto no art. 672?, n.? 1, c), do CPC, quando, interpretando a mesma cl?usula de uma...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 19 октября 2022, n° 6940/19.6T8PRT-A.P1.S1
Relator: RAMALHO PINTO. I- Sobre os fundamentos do recurso de revis?o, disp?e o art.? 696.?, al. c), do C?digo de Processo Civil, no que ao caso dos autos concerne, que...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 19 октября 2022, n° 1910/18.4T8VCT.G1.S2
Relator: RAMALHO PINTO. I - O requisito da al. b) do n? 1 do artigo 672? do C?digo de Processo Civil ?tem ?nsita a aplica??o de preceito ou instituto a...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 19 октября 2022, n° 2314/21.7T8LSB.L1.S1
Relator: J?LIO GOMES. I- A letra da conven??o ? n?o apenas o ponto de partida da interpreta??o, mas o limite da mesma; II- Se uma interpreta??o proposta n?o tiver o...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 19 октября 2022, n° 3545/18.2T8BCL.G1.S1
Relator: J?LIO GOMES. N?o tendo sido alegada, nem provada, a filia??o sindical de uma trabalhadora n?o se deve interpretar o seu contrato individual de trabalho com recurso aos conceitos consagrados...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 19 октября 2022, n° 18905/19.3T8LSB.L1.S2
Relator: M?RIO BELO MORGADO. I- No conjunto dos casos submetidos ? aprecia??o dos tribunais, imp?e-se distinguir os casos simples dos casos dif?ceis (?hard cases?), que n?o se compadecem com opera??es...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 19 октября 2022, n° 15883/19.2T8LSB.L1.S2
Relator: M?RIO BELO MORGADO. I- As quest?es em discuss?o nos dois ac?rd?os s?o distintas, pese embora ambos os julgados se terem debru?ado sobre a interpreta??o da f?rmula ??ltimo vencimento l?quido...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 19 октября 2022, n° 5133/19.7T8SNT.S1
Relator: M?RIO BELO MORGADO. I- A data correspondente ao diagn?stico inequ?voco da doen?a profissional determina a data da certifica??o da doen?a II - A determina??o da retribui??o de refer?ncia, enquanto...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 19 октября 2022, n° 13358/20.6T8LSB.S1
Relator: DOMINGOS JOS? DE MORAIS. O n?o cumprimento do contradit?rio no ?mbito da aplica??o do artigo 74.? do CPT constitui nulidade de senten?a/ac?rd?o, dado a condena??o ?extra vel ultra petitum?...