White Fish Limited v The Pensions Regulator

2. In directions issued on 1 July 2025, the appellant was directed as follows: 1. The Appellant must respond to the Tribunal no later than 5pm on 17 July 2025 to confirm whether they wish to continue with their appeal. If they wish to continue with their appeal, they must make representations as to why the case should not be...

Source officielle

Calcul en cours 0

2. In directions issued on 1 July 2025, the appellant was directed as follows: 1. The Appellant must respond to the Tribunal no later than 5pm on 17 July 2025 to confirm whether they wish to continue with their appeal. If they wish to continue with their appeal, they must make representations as to why the case should not be struck out. 2. Failure to do so could result in the Tribunal striking out the Appellant’s case. 3. The appellant was further warned: 7. The Appellant is therefore required to confirm their position regarding the above. If no response is received, the Appellant is on notice that the Tribunal may strike out the appeal. 4. No response has been received from the appellant. 5. I am satisfied that pursuant to rule 8(4) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 (the Procedure Rules), the appellant was notified of the possibility that these proceedings would be struck out and has had a proper opportunity to provide a response. 6. I am satisfied that the appellant has failed to comply with a direction which stated that failure to comply could result in the proceedings being struck out and that the appellant’s failure to co-operate means that the tribunal cannot deal with the matter fairly or justly. Given these failings, it is not necessary for me to address the issue of whether the appeal has no realistic prospect of success. SignedJ K SwaneyDate: 15 September 2025 Judge J K Swaney Judge of the First-tier Tribunal


Open Justice Licence (The National Archives).

A propos de cette decision

Décisions similaires

Royaume-Uni

First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) – Information Rights

Fiscal EN

Beacon Counselling Trust v The Information Commissioner & Anor

Introduction to the Appeal 1. On 23 May 2024, the Appellant submitted a request (“the Request”) to the Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (“the Trust”) for copies of correspondence making reference to the Appellant, which had been sent to or from a named person at the Trust from 1 February 2023 to the date of the Request. 2....

Royaume-Uni

High Court (Chancery Division)

Fiscal EN

Kalaivani Jaipal Kirishani v George Major

Sir Anthony Mann : Introduction 1. This is an appeal from an order of HHJ Gerald sitting in the County Court at Central London dated 23rd December 2024 in which he dismissed two of three claims made by Ms Kirishana as claimant against her former cohabitee Mr Major. The claims were for a contribution to household and other domestic expenses,...

Royaume-Uni

High Court (Insolvency and Companies List)

Commercial EN

Joanna Rich v JDDR Capital Limited

ICC JUDGE AGNELLO KC: Introduction 1. This is the judgment in relation to an application to set aside a statutory demand against Mrs Joanna Rich (Mrs Rich) and a petition against Mr Clive Rich (Mr Rich) relating to the same debt claimed under a personal guarantee provided by them in relation to a loan granted to LawBit Limited (Lawbit). Mr...

Analyse stratégique offerte

Envoyez vos pièces. Recevez une stratégie.

Transmettez-nous les pièces de votre dossier pénal. Maître Hassan KOHEN vous répond personnellement sous 24 heures avec une première analyse stratégique de votre situation.

  • Première analyse offerte et sans engagement
  • Réponse personnelle de l'avocat sous 24 heures
  • 100 % confidentiel, secret professionnel garanti
  • Jusqu'à 1 Go de pièces, dossiers et sous-dossiers acceptés

Cliquez ou glissez vos fichiers ici
Tous formats acceptes (PDF, Word, images, etc.)

Envoi en cours...

Vos donnees sont utilisees uniquement pour traiter votre demande. Politique de confidentialite.