Abbey Meech v Driver & Vehicle Standards Agency

2. The appellant lodge a notice of appeal on 23 July 2024 purporting to appeal a decision of the Driver & Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) dated 15 July 2024. 3. The appellant made an application for admission to the register of Approved Driving Instructors. In her application she declared two motoring offences on 14 October 2022 and 11 September 2023...

Source officielle

3 min de lecture 486 mots

2. The appellant lodge a notice of appeal on 23 July 2024 purporting to appeal a decision of the Driver & Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) dated 15 July 2024. 3. The appellant made an application for admission to the register of Approved Driving Instructors. In her application she declared two motoring offences on 14 October 2022 and 11 September 2023 which each resulted in 3 penalty points. In an email dated 15 July 2024 the DVSA advised the appellant as follows: I remind you that Section 125(3)(e) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 provides that one of the conditions you must fulfil to be issued a trainee licence or to have your name entered onto the Register of Approved Driving Instructors is to be a “fit and proper” person. Having considered your application the Registrar feels it is highly unlikely that any application you submit for a trainee licence, or to have your name added to the register, would be accepted until 14 October 2025 when your 3 penalty points for your 2022 offence are no longer counted towards the totting up process. You should therefore apply again closer to this date with a new criminal record check obtained through our contractor, details of which can be found here: https://www.gov.uk/criminal-record-check-become-driving-instructor Your record as a whole will be considered again at that time. (Emphasis added) 4. On 14 August 2024 a registrar determined that the appeal was ‘a valid appeal according to the Road Traffic Act 1988 s131 (2)(a)’. Section 131 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 provides that a person who is aggrieved by a decision of the Registrar to refuse an application for the grant of a licence under Part V of the Act may appeal to the First-tier Tribunal. 5. I find that the email of 15 July 2024 is not a decision to refuse the appellant’s application. It is advice that her application is unlikely to succeed because of the penalty points she has accrued. The email is effectively an invitation to the appellant to withdraw her application and reapply after 14 October 2025 when the penalty points for her 2022 offence would no longer be counted. 6. There is nothing before me to suggest that the Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors went on to make a decision on the appellant’s application. 7. I find that there has been no decision to refuse an application for the grant of a licence under Part V of the Act and accordingly the tribunal does not have jurisdiction in relation to the proceedings under section 131 and I strike the notice of appeal out. 8. The appeal is at an end and no further action will be taken in relation to it. SignedDate: 14 November 2024 Judge J K Swaney Judge of the First-tier Tribunal


Open Justice Licence (The National Archives).

A propos de cette decision

Décisions similaires

Royaume-Uni

First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) – Information Rights

Fiscal EN

Beacon Counselling Trust v The Information Commissioner & Anor

Introduction to the Appeal 1. On 23 May 2024, the Appellant submitted a request (“the Request”) to the Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (“the Trust”) for copies of correspondence making reference to the Appellant, which had been sent to or from a named person at the Trust from 1 February 2023 to the date of the Request. 2....

Royaume-Uni

High Court (Chancery Division)

Fiscal EN

Kalaivani Jaipal Kirishani v George Major

Sir Anthony Mann : Introduction 1. This is an appeal from an order of HHJ Gerald sitting in the County Court at Central London dated 23rd December 2024 in which he dismissed two of three claims made by Ms Kirishana as claimant against her former cohabitee Mr Major. The claims were for a contribution to household and other domestic expenses,...

Royaume-Uni

High Court (Insolvency and Companies List)

Commercial EN

Joanna Rich v JDDR Capital Limited

ICC JUDGE AGNELLO KC: Introduction 1. This is the judgment in relation to an application to set aside a statutory demand against Mrs Joanna Rich (Mrs Rich) and a petition against Mr Clive Rich (Mr Rich) relating to the same debt claimed under a personal guarantee provided by them in relation to a loan granted to LawBit Limited (Lawbit). Mr...

Analyse stratégique offerte

Envoyez vos pièces. Recevez une stratégie.

Transmettez-nous les pièces de votre dossier. Maître Hassan KOHEN vous répond personnellement sous 24 heures avec une première analyse stratégique de votre situation.

  • Première analyse offerte et sans engagement
  • Réponse personnelle de l'avocat sous 24 heures
  • 100 % confidentiel, secret professionnel garanti
  • Jusqu'à 1 Go de pièces, dossiers et sous-dossiers acceptés

Cliquez ou glissez vos fichiers ici
Tous formats acceptes (PDF, Word, images, etc.)

Envoi en cours...

Vos donnees sont utilisees uniquement pour traiter votre demande. Politique de confidentialite.