Nursing and Midwifery Council v Armstrong
MR JUSTICE SWIFT: 1 The first step to be taken now will consideration of the Rule 33 application. If that is successful, that will be the end of the proceedings. If that is not successful, then there will be a merits hearing. 2 Again, you are asking for a further 4 months. I cannot help but notice that even though...
2 min de lecture · 276 mots
MR JUSTICE SWIFT: 1 The first step to be taken now will consideration of the Rule 33 application. If that is successful, that will be the end of the proceedings. If that is not successful, then there will be a merits hearing. 2 Again, you are asking for a further 4 months. I cannot help but notice that even though this is a restriction of practise of order rather than a suspension it has been in place over an extended period now. I appreciate there had have some unavoidable delays in terms of the criminal process but it is still 19 months or so since April last year when the criminal proceedings were discontinued 3 I also appreciate there have been some difficulties obtaining sufficient medical evidence to deal with the Rule 33 application. But I think minds do need to be focused on cases where restrictions or suspensions have been in place over extended periods of time. It is unsatisfactory that professional disciplinary proceedings remain open over extended periods. I will make the order this time, but I would not expect a further application to be necessary, unless there were genuinely compelling reasons for that application. CERTIFICATE Opus 2 International Ltd. Hereby certifies that the above is an accurate and complete record of the judgment or part thereof. Transcribed by Opus 2 International Ltd. (Incorporating Beverley F. Nunnery & Co.) Official Court Reporters and Audio Transcribers 5 New Street Square, London EC4A 3BFTel: 020 7831 5627 Fax: 020 7831 7737 [email protected] This transcript has been approved by the Judge.
Sources officielles : consulter la page source
Open Justice Licence (The National Archives).
Articles similaires
A propos de cette decision
Décisions similaires
Royaume-Uni
First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) – Information Rights
Beacon Counselling Trust v The Information Commissioner & Anor
Introduction to the Appeal 1. On 23 May 2024, the Appellant submitted a request (“the Request”) to the Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (“the Trust”) for copies of correspondence making reference to the Appellant, which had been sent to or from a named person at the Trust from 1 February 2023 to the date of the Request. 2....
Royaume-Uni
High Court (Chancery Division)
Kalaivani Jaipal Kirishani v George Major
Sir Anthony Mann : Introduction 1. This is an appeal from an order of HHJ Gerald sitting in the County Court at Central London dated 23rd December 2024 in which he dismissed two of three claims made by Ms Kirishana as claimant against her former cohabitee Mr Major. The claims were for a contribution to household and other domestic expenses,...
Royaume-Uni
High Court (Insolvency and Companies List)
Joanna Rich v JDDR Capital Limited
ICC JUDGE AGNELLO KC: Introduction 1. This is the judgment in relation to an application to set aside a statutory demand against Mrs Joanna Rich (Mrs Rich) and a petition against Mr Clive Rich (Mr Rich) relating to the same debt claimed under a personal guarantee provided by them in relation to a loan granted to LawBit Limited (Lawbit). Mr...