Robert Amegadzie v The Information Commissioner
on Strike Out Application 1. The Appellant’s Notice of Appeal dated 27 July 2022 is struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. REASONS 2. On 16 September 2022, the Information Commissioner applied for a strike out under rule 8(3)(c) of the Tribunal’s Rules, on the basis that this appeal has no reasonable prospect of success. 3. The Appellant’s...
2 min de lecture · 272 mots
on Strike Out Application 1. The Appellant’s Notice of Appeal dated 27 July 2022 is struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. REASONS 2. On 16 September 2022, the Information Commissioner applied for a strike out under rule 8(3)(c) of the Tribunal’s Rules, on the basis that this appeal has no reasonable prospect of success. 3. The Appellant’s Notice of Appeal is understood to constitute an application for an Order under s. 166(2) of the Data Protection Act 2018. He had made a complaint to the Information Commissioner but had not received a response. 4. In his Response to the Appeal, the Information Commissioner apologises for the delay in responding to the Appellant’s complaint and explains that he has now written to the data controller and to the Appellant. The case is now closed. 5. The Appellant was invited to withdraw his appeal, and/or to comment on the proposed strike out pursuant to rule 8 (4). The deadline for receipt of his comments was set at 30 September 2022, but he did not reply. 6. As the Tribunal’s jurisdiction under s. 166 DPA 2018 is procedural, and as the relevant procedural steps appear now to have been taken, it does not seem to me that there is a live issue for the Tribunal to determine in this case. Accordingly, I am satisfied that it is not fit for a hearing, and I now strike it out under rule 8 (3)(c). (Signed) Dated: 23 December 2022 Judge Alison McKenna © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022
Sources officielles : consulter la page source
Open Justice Licence (The National Archives).
Articles similaires
A propos de cette decision
Décisions similaires
Royaume-Uni
First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) – Information Rights
Beacon Counselling Trust v The Information Commissioner & Anor
Introduction to the Appeal 1. On 23 May 2024, the Appellant submitted a request (“the Request”) to the Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (“the Trust”) for copies of correspondence making reference to the Appellant, which had been sent to or from a named person at the Trust from 1 February 2023 to the date of the Request. 2....
Royaume-Uni
High Court (Chancery Division)
Kalaivani Jaipal Kirishani v George Major
Sir Anthony Mann : Introduction 1. This is an appeal from an order of HHJ Gerald sitting in the County Court at Central London dated 23rd December 2024 in which he dismissed two of three claims made by Ms Kirishana as claimant against her former cohabitee Mr Major. The claims were for a contribution to household and other domestic expenses,...
Royaume-Uni
High Court (Insolvency and Companies List)
Joanna Rich v JDDR Capital Limited
ICC JUDGE AGNELLO KC: Introduction 1. This is the judgment in relation to an application to set aside a statutory demand against Mrs Joanna Rich (Mrs Rich) and a petition against Mr Clive Rich (Mr Rich) relating to the same debt claimed under a personal guarantee provided by them in relation to a loan granted to LawBit Limited (Lawbit). Mr...