Shields & Sons Partnership v The Commissioners for HMRC

Mr Justice Nugee: Introduction 1. This is a further decision in the appeal by Shields & Sons Partnership (“Shields”) from a decision of the First-tier Tribunal (“the FTT”) dated 8 October 2014, the Respondents being Her Majesty’s Commissioners for Revenue and Customs (“HMRC”). In a Decision released on 16 March 2016, I gave reasons why it was appropriate for a...

Source officielle

2 min de lecture 388 mots

Mr Justice Nugee: Introduction 1. This is a further decision in the appeal by Shields & Sons Partnership (“Shields”) from a decision of the First-tier Tribunal (“the FTT”) dated 8 October 2014, the Respondents being Her Majesty’s Commissioners for Revenue and Customs (“HMRC”). In a Decision released on 16 March 2016, I gave reasons why it was appropriate for a reference to be made to the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) requesting a preliminary ruling on two questions: see [2016] UKUT 142 (TCC). 2. The reference was duly made and received by the CJEU on 12 May 2016. The CJEU delivered its judgment on 12 October 2017: see Shields & Sons Partnership v HMRC C-262/16. Its answers to the two questions referred were as follows: “1 Article 296(2) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as laying down exhaustively all the cases in which a member state may exclude a farmer from the common flat-rate scheme for farmers. 2 Article 296(2) of Directive 2006/112 must be interpreted as meaning that farmers who are found to be recovering substantially more as members of the common flat-rate scheme for farmers than they would if they were subject to the normal value added tax arrangements or the simplified value added tax arrangements cannot constitute a category of farmers within the meaning of that provision.” 3. It is common ground between the parties that the effect of those rulings is that Shields’ appeal against the decision of the FTT must be allowed. 4. I therefore allow the appeal. I am also asked to direct as follows: (1) Shields’ agricultural flat-rate certificate will be reinstated from the date on which it was withdrawn, namely 15 October 2012. (2) Shields will issue 4% flat-rate addition invoices to VAT-registered customers retrospectively. 5. There is also no dispute that Shields should be awarded their costs. I will therefore direct that HMRC pay Shields their costs of the appeal, to be assessed on the standard basis if not agreed, pursuant to rule 10(8)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008/2698. MR JUSTICE NUGEE RELEASE DATE: 21 December 2017


Open Justice Licence (The National Archives).

A propos de cette decision

Décisions similaires

Royaume-Uni

First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) – Information Rights

Fiscal EN

Beacon Counselling Trust v The Information Commissioner & Anor

Introduction to the Appeal 1. On 23 May 2024, the Appellant submitted a request (“the Request”) to the Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (“the Trust”) for copies of correspondence making reference to the Appellant, which had been sent to or from a named person at the Trust from 1 February 2023 to the date of the Request. 2....

Royaume-Uni

High Court (Chancery Division)

Fiscal EN

Kalaivani Jaipal Kirishani v George Major

Sir Anthony Mann : Introduction 1. This is an appeal from an order of HHJ Gerald sitting in the County Court at Central London dated 23rd December 2024 in which he dismissed two of three claims made by Ms Kirishana as claimant against her former cohabitee Mr Major. The claims were for a contribution to household and other domestic expenses,...

Royaume-Uni

High Court (Insolvency and Companies List)

Commercial EN

Joanna Rich v JDDR Capital Limited

ICC JUDGE AGNELLO KC: Introduction 1. This is the judgment in relation to an application to set aside a statutory demand against Mrs Joanna Rich (Mrs Rich) and a petition against Mr Clive Rich (Mr Rich) relating to the same debt claimed under a personal guarantee provided by them in relation to a loan granted to LawBit Limited (Lawbit). Mr...

Analyse stratégique offerte

Envoyez vos pièces. Recevez une stratégie.

Transmettez-nous les pièces de votre dossier. Maître Hassan KOHEN vous répond personnellement sous 24 heures avec une première analyse stratégique de votre situation.

  • Première analyse offerte et sans engagement
  • Réponse personnelle de l'avocat sous 24 heures
  • 100 % confidentiel, secret professionnel garanti
  • Jusqu'à 1 Go de pièces, dossiers et sous-dossiers acceptés

Cliquez ou glissez vos fichiers ici
Tous formats acceptes (PDF, Word, images, etc.)

Envoi en cours...

Vos donnees sont utilisees uniquement pour traiter votre demande. Politique de confidentialite.