Décisions de justice publiées par le cabinet
-
First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) – Information Rights, 18 avril 2024, n° [2024] UKFTT 313 (GRC)
Introduction 1. All parties agreed and the tribunal concurs that this appeal was suitable for determination on the papers. 2. This is an appeal against the Commissioner’s decision notice IC-198579-P1Y0...
-
High Court (Commercial Court), 18 avril 2024, n° [2024] EWHC 1051 (Comm)
MR JUSTICE PICKEN: Introduction 1 This is an application for summary judgment which the Claimant (‘Sucden’) wishes to obtain against the first of three Defendants, namely TMT Metals AG (‘TMT’),...
-
High Court (Technology and Construction Court), 18 avril 2024, n° [2024] EWHC 954 (TCC)
Mrs Justice O'FarrellThursday, 18 April 2024 (15:02pm) Ruling by MRS JUSTICE O'FARRELL 1. This matter concerns Vale's application for Model C disclosure in relation to disclosure issue 14 as between...
-
Family Court (B - district and circuit judges), 18 avril 2024, n° [2024] EWFC 138 (B)
HHJ PARKER: 1. This is an ex tempore judgment. The Court is concerned with the welfare of the child A, born 19 February 2023, currently aged 14 months. The local...
-
High Court (Technology and Construction Court), 18 avril 2024, n° [2024] EWHC 952 (TCC)
Mrs Justice O'Farrell Thursday, 18 April 2024 (11:11am) Ruling by MRS JUSTICE O'FARRELL 1. Before the court is the claimants' application, dated 8 April 2024, seeking to extend the disclosure...
-
Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber), 18 avril 2024, n° [2024] UKUT 126 (AAC)
1. The appeal is allowed to the extent of remittal. REASONS FOR DECISION A. Introduction 2. The appellant appeals to the Upper Tribunal against the DBS’s decision communicated in a...
-
High Court (Patents Court), 18 avril 2024, n° [2024] EWHC 846 (Ch)
Mr Justice Richards: 1. This is my judgment on the following applications: i) the Defendants’ application of 5 December 2023 contesting jurisdiction as regards certain aspects of the Claimants’ claims...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 18 avril 2024, n° [2024] EWCA Civ 376
1. In this case, the 134 claimants (the Claimants) issued a single claim form against Williams & Co Solicitors (the Solicitors). Each of the Claimants sought damages for breaches of...
-
Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber), 18 avril 2024, n° [2024] UKUT 124 (AAC)
The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to dismiss the appeal. REASONS FOR DECISION Introduction 1. This is an appeal against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal of 16 September...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 18 avril 2024, n° [2024] EWHC 855 (Admin)
Introduction 1. In this application for judicial review, which follows the Secretary of State for Justice’s (“SOS”) decision to recall the Claimant to prison on 1 February 2023, I am...
-
High Court (Technology and Construction Court), 18 avril 2024, n° [2024] EWHC 1122 (TCC)
MRS JUSTICE JEFFORD: 1. There is before the court an application made by the claimants on 4 April for disclosure guidance pursuant to Practice Direction 57AD paragraph 11. The application,...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 avril 2024, n° 1790/22.5T8TMR-A.E1.S1
Relator: FERNANDO BAPTISTA. I. O processo tutelar comum, ? um processo de jurisdi??o volunt?ria, nele se impondo como limite recurs?rio o Tribunal da Rela??o, sem preju?zo de admissibilidade do recurso...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 avril 2024, n° 1019/06.3TBBJA-A.E1.S1
Relator: PAULA LEAL DE CARVALHO. I. N?o se verifica dupla conforme quanto ?s situa??es que correspondam ? viola??o de disposi??o processual no exerc?cio dos poderes do Tribunal da Rela??o relativamente...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 avril 2024, n° 7963/21.0T8LSB.L1.S1
Relator: EMIDIO SANTOS. O dever de o juiz examinar criticamente as provas, a que se refere o n.? 4 do artigo 607.? do CPC, n?o implica o dever de o...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 avril 2024, n° 303/22.3T8FNC-A.L1.S1
Relator: AFONSO HENRIQUE. I - A livran?a constitui uma garantia cartular t?pica que atribui ao avalista a obriga??o de responder solidariamente com o/a avalizado/a. II ? A invocada autoridade de...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 avril 2024, n° 2118/21.7T8BRG.G1.S1
Relator: AFONSO HENRIQUE. I - O invocado erro de julgamento da Rela??o s? pode ser apreciado quando haja ofensa duma disposi??o expressa da lei que exija certa esp?cie de prova...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 avril 2024, n° 864/15.3T8ABF.E1.S1
Relator: FERANDO BAPTISTA. I. Sendo a for?a probat?ria das per?cias apreciada livremente pelo tribunal, n?o pode o Supremo Tribunal de Justi?a pronunciar-se sobre o ju?zo relativo ? prova pericial, salvo...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 avril 2024, n° 6271/23.7T8VNG.P1-A.S1
Relator: JO?O CURA MARIANO. Residindo a causa de pedir dos pedidos indemnizat?rios formulados na presente a??o popular, na pr?tica pela R? de um pre?o de venda de um produto superior...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 avril 2024, n° 228/22.2T8LLE-A.E1.S1
Relator: JO?O CURA MARIANO. I. A interpreta??o do contrato ? decisiva para a qualifica??o do modo de extin??o do cr?dito acordada entre as partes, designadamente para sabermos se nos encontramos...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 avril 2024, n° 903/19.9T8LSB.L1.S1.S3
Relator: JO?O CURA MARIANO. As situa??es de invalidez absoluta e definitiva, cobertas por contratos de seguro do Ramo Vida, em que nestes contratos se faz corresponder tais situa??es a uma...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 avril 2024, n° 693/22.8T8PDL.L1.S1
Relator: CATARINA SERRA. A impugna??o de justifica??o notarial qualifica-se como uma ac??o de aprecia??o negativa, em que o impugnante deve alegar e demonstrar os fundamentos do seu pedido, designadamente que...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 avril 2024, n° 6554/18.8T8FNC-B.L1.S1
Relator: CATARINA SERRA. Para que um pedido reconvencional seja admiss?vel ? preciso que se verifiquem os ?factores de conex?o? entre o pedido reconvencional e o pedido do autor (cfr. n.?...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 avril 2024, n° 3581/16.3T8GMR.G2.S1
Relator: ANA PAULA LOBO. Quando num contrato de compra e venda de bem im?vel o destino a dar pelo comprador ao terreno vendido foi causa determinante da realiza??o da venda...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 avril 2024, n° 35744/15.3T8LSB.E1.S1
Relator: JO?O CURA MARIANO. I - Nas situa??es de favorecimento ou contribui??o para uma exposi??o de terceiros a uma situa??o de perigo, a responsabilidade aquiliana residir? na viola??o de um...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 avril 2024, n° 2932/20.0T8LSB.L1.S1
Relator: MARIA DA GRA?A TRIGO. I. Acompanha-se o entendimento das inst?ncias segundo o qual, ao contrato de presta??o de servi?os n?o tipificado dos autos, s?o aplic?veis as disposi??es legais relativas...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 18 avril 2024, n° 320/23.6YRPRT-B.S1
Relator: VASQUES OS?RIO. I - O MDE ? definido no art. 1.?, n.? 1 da Lei n.? 65/2003, de 23-08 ? tem como ?nicos objectivos a deten??o e entrega da...
-
Bundesverfassungsgericht, 18 avril 2024, n° 2 BvR 29/24
Erfolgreiche Verfassungsbeschwerde wegen Verletzung des Anspruchs auf freie Entfaltung der Persönlichkeit
-
Rechtbank Midden-Nederland, 17 avril 2024, n° UTR 23/3027
WHT
-
Rechtbank Midden-Nederland, 17 avril 2024, n° C/16/553031 / HA ZA 23-154
Tussen eiser en gedaagde sub 3 bestond een maatschapsovereenkomst. Deze overeenkomst is opgezegd. Partijen twisten over het bedrag dat aan eiser moet worden betaald. Eiser meent recht te hebben op...
-
Rechtbank Den Haag, 17 avril 2024, n° C/09/651077 HA ZA 23-644
strafvorderlijk beslag o.g.v. artikel 94 Sv; betwistingsprocedure artikel 477a lid 2 Rv; betaling tijdens beslag, artikel 475 h lid 1