Décisions de justice publiées par le cabinet
-
Rechtbank Rotterdam, 6 juillet 2022, n° ROT 21/476
Einduitspraak na tussenuitspraak. Gebrek hersteld. Marktverordening. Geen aanleiding om op grond van artikel 4:84 van de Beleidsregels af te wijken.
-
Cours d’appel de Finlande, 6 juillet 2022, n° R 21/520
$99 ITÄ-UUDENMAAN KÄRÄJÄOIKEUDEN TUOMIO 12.1.2021 HELSINGIN HOVIOIKEUDEN TUOMIO 6.7.2022 Tuomiolauselma Vastaaja A Muutokset käräjäoikeuden tuomioon: Rangaistusseuraamukset Yhteinen rangaistus Syyksi luetut rikokset 1–12 1 vuosi 10 kuukautta vankeutta Vapaudenmenetysaika 25.10. –...
-
First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) – Information Rights, 6 juillet 2022, n° [2023] UKFTT 983 (GRC)
1. The Monetary Penalty Notice dated 7 January 2020 in the sum of £500,000 was wrong in law and is substituted by this Decision. 2. A Monetary Penalty in the...
-
High Court (Intellectual Property List), 6 juillet 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1707 (Ch)
Covid-19 Protocol: This judgment was handed down by the judge remotely by circulation to the parties’ representatives by email and release to The National Archives. The date and time for...
-
First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) – Information Rights, 6 juillet 2022, n° [2022] UKFTT 256 (GRC)
Introduction 1. The parties and the Tribunal agreed that this matter was suitable for determination on the papers in accordance with rule 32 Chamber’s Procedure Rules. 2. This is an...
-
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), 6 juillet 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Crim 968
MR JUSTICE FRASER: 1. This is a renewed application for permission to appeal against conviction following refusal by the single judge. The applicant also requires an extension of time in...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 6 juillet 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Civ 935
Sir Geoffrey Vos Master of the Rolls, Sir Andrew McFarlane Presidentof the Family Division and Lady Justice King: Introduction 1. This tragic case concerns the future of 12-year old Archie....
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 6 juillet 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Civ 929
This judgment was handed down remotely by circulation to the parties' representatives by email and release to The National Archives. The date and time for hand-down is deemed to be...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 6 juillet 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1694 (Ch)
Deputy Master Bowles : 1. The Claimant, Mr Neil Mackenzie (Mr Mackenzie) is the freehold owner of residential premises at 432 Selsdon Road, South Croydon (432). The property is a...
-
Employment Appeal Tribunal, 6 juillet 2022, n° [2022] EAT 94
SUMMARY PRACTICE & PROCEDURE Estoppel, Abuse of Process, Strike Out Dismissing the first ground of appeal. The ET was considering whether to strike out a claim. It took account of...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 6 juillet 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1729 (Admin)
Introduction 1. This appeal by the appellant (Ms Lu) is from a decision of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (the tribunal) published on 26 February 2021, in disciplinary proceedings brought by...
-
First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber), 6 juillet 2022, n° [2022] UKFTT 209 (TC)
Introduction 1. This is an appeal by Hawksmoor Construction Ltd (Hawksmoor) against a VAT default surcharge of £2,252.12 imposed under section 59 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 (VATA...
-
High Court (Chancery Division), 6 juillet 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1670 (Ch)
This judgment will be handed down by the Judge remotely by circulation to the parties' representatives by email and release to The National Archives. The date and time for hand-down...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 6 juillet 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Civ 936
LADY JUSTICE ANDREWS: INTRODUCTION 1. In response to the recommendations in Lord Justice Jackson’s 2009 report on civil litigation costs, Section 45 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of...
-
Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber), 6 juillet 2022, n° [2022] UKUT 184 (AAC)
On appeal from the Disclosure and Barring Service (“DBS”) DBS Reference: 00898655289 Final Decision Letter: 21 October 2020 The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to refuse the appeal. The...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 6 juillet 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1675 (Admin)
Mr Justice Eyre: Introduction. 1. The Claimant is a community interest company and in these proceedings it challenges the Defendant’s decision of 25th October 2021 (“the Decision”) whereby the Defendant...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 6 juillet 2022, n° [2022] EWCA Civ 930
LORD JUSTICE BAKER : 1. This is an appeal against the placement order made under the Adoption and Children Act 2002 in respect of a three-year-old girl, C. The appeal...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 6 juillet 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1705 (Admin)
MR JUSTICE FORDHAM: 1. This is a judicial determination on the papers, but where it is, in my judgment, appropriate to give reasons by way of a short judgment. This...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 6 juillet 2022, n° [2022] EWHC 1777 (Admin)
1. This is an application for judicial review of the decision of the defendant (“the Ombudsman”) made on 22 July 2021 that he did not have jurisdiction to investigate complaints...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 6 juillet 2022, n° 188/21.7PGPDL.L1.S1
Relator: TERESA DE ALMEIDA. I. Pelas circunst?ncias, em modelo repetido, da pr?tica dos referidos crimes, na maioria das vezes, em locais n?o habitados, n?o se verificou, em concreto, afeta??o de...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 6 juillet 2022, n° 438/07.2PBVCT-AA.S1
Relator: TERESA DE ALMEIDA. I. ? arguida a nulidade de ac?rd?o proferido em recurso extraordin?rio de revis?o, por este tribunal n?o se ter pronunciado sobre se um facto dado como...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 6 juillet 2022, n° 162/17.8JGLSB.E1.S1
Relator: PEDRO BRANQUINHO DIAS. I - ??Verificado o pressuposto favor?vel do instituto da suspens?o da execu??o da pena, ter-se-? de averiguar se o seu pressuposto material, ou seja, o da...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 6 juillet 2022, n° 184/12.5TELSB-R.L1-A.S1
Relator: PEDRO BARNQUIHO DIAS. I - ?? O recurso extraordin?rio para fixa??o de jurisprud?ncia, previsto no art. 437.? e ss. do CPP, tem como finalidade espec?fica evitar contradi??es entre ac?rd?os...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 6 juillet 2022, n° 5897/16.0T9LSB-B.L1.S1
Relator: HELENA FAZENDA. I -???Al?m de n?o terem sido carreados elementos suficientes para os autos que permitam aferir do impedimento da subscritora do despacho proferido, acresce que o recurso n?o...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 6 juillet 2022, n° 77/12.6GTCSC.L1.S1
Relator: HELENA FAZENDA. I -???O recorrente foi condenado em 1? inst?ncia pela pr?tica, em concurso efetivo, dos seguintes crimes e nas penas parcelares que a seguir se indicam: i) como...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 6 juillet 2022, n° 9/19.0GAODM.E1.S1
Relator: ANA BARATA BRITO. I - ??A sindicabilidade da medida concreta da pena em via de recurso direcciona-se ao (des)respeito de princ?pios gerais, ? (des)considera??o dos factores que relevam na...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 6 juillet 2022, n° 202/20.3JAFAR.E1.S1
Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I - ??De harmonia com o disposto no art. 400.?, n?1, al. f), do CPP, ?N?o ? admiss?vel recurso: (?) De ac?rd?os condenat?rios proferidos, em recurso, pelas...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 6 juillet 2022, n° 15/20.2PEVIS.C1.S1
Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I -???Constitui um s? crime continuado a realiza??o pl?rima do mesmo tipo de crime ou de v?rios tipos de crime que fundamentalmente protejam o mesmo bem jur?dico,...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 6 juillet 2022, n° 3/15.0IFLSB.L1.S1
Relator: CONCEI??O GOMES. I -??? A nulidade do ac?rd?o, por omiss?o de pron?ncia, ocorre quando o tribunal deixe de pronunciar-se sobre quest?es que devesse apreciar ou conhe?a de quest?es de...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 6 juillet 2022, n° 571/19.8T8AVR.P1.S1
Relator: LOPES DA MOTA. I ? Discordando da medida da pena, recorre o arguido do ac?rd?o do tribunal coletivo que, em c?mulo, lhe aplicou a pena ?nica de 11 anos...