Supreme Court of Mauritius, 30 janvier 2020, 2020 PL1 7 – Marie Clarel David v. Maneshwaree David
Marie Clarel David v. Maneshwaree David 2020 PL1 7 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF PORT LOUIS (DIV I) Cause Number: - 185/19 In the matter of: - David Marie Clarel Applicant v. David Maneshwaree Respondent JUDGMENT This is an application for an order under section 3 (1) of the Protection from Domestic Violence Act 1997. The applicant was represented by...
2 min de lecture · 365 mots
Marie Clarel David v. Maneshwaree David
2020 PL1 7
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF PORT LOUIS (DIV I) Cause Number: – 185/19 In the matter of: – David Marie Clarel Applicant v. David Maneshwaree Respondent JUDGMENT
This is an application for an order under section 3 (1) of the Protection from Domestic Violence Act 1997. The applicant was represented by counsel and the respondent was not represented by counsel.
It is the case for the applicant that he has been married to the respondent for 16 years and that they have three children together. They have encountered marital conflicts for a long time and that there is a divorce petition before Court. It is the contention of the applicant that on 01 October 2019, after their appearance in court for the divorce petition, the respondent verbally abused the applicant. The incident was reported at the Pope Hennessy Police Station. Furthermore, it is averred that the respondent is violent, insults the applicant and throws things at him.
The respondent deposed under solemn affirmation and denied the version of the applicant. In her cross examination, the respondent admitted there was an incident on 01 October 2019 but denied that she had verbally abused the applicant. However, upon further being questioned by learned counsel for the applicant, the respondent grew vexed, refused to answer any further questions and further in a fit of anger left the court.
I have considered the evidence adduced as well as the demeanour of the respective witnesses and I find that the applicant has proved his case on a balance of probabilities. The applicant
deposed in a clear and straight forward manner and was not material shaken under cross examination. On the other hand, I was not impressed with the version of the respondent who was short tempered and rude in court.
For the above reasons, I grant the applicant a Protection Order under the Protection against Domestic Violence Act for a period of one (1) year.
S Chui [Judgment delivered by S Chui (Mrs) Senior District Magistrate] [Judgment delivered on 30 January 2020]
Sources officielles : consulter la page source · PDF officiel
Supreme Court of Mauritius – public domain
Articles similaires
A propos de cette decision
Décisions similaires
Maurice
Supreme Court of Mauritius
Supreme Court of Mauritius, 15 mai 2026, 2026 PMP 7 - Police v Ravi Kumar Seeborun
Police v Ravi Kumar Seeborun 2026 PMP 7 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF PAMPLEMOUSSES CN: 4868/25 In the matter of:- Police v Ravi Kumar Seeborun JUGMENT A. Introduction 1. The Accused stands charged with an offence of Driving without due care and attention in breach of Sections 123C (1)(a) and 52 Second Schedule of Road Traffic Act as amended. 2....
Maurice
Supreme Court of Mauritius
Supreme Court of Mauritius, 14 mai 2026, 2026 PMP 6 - Yoan Jonathan Attiow
Yoan Jonathan Attiow 2026 PMP 6 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF PAMPLEMOUSSES CN: 2613/20 In the matter of:- Police v Yoan Jonathan Atthiow JUGMENT A. Introduction 1. The Accused stands charged with an offence of Assaulting an agent of the civil authority in breach of Section 158 and 159 of the Criminal Code. 2. The information avers that on or...
Maurice
Supreme Court of Mauritius
Supreme Court of Mauritius, 13 mai 2026, 2026 SAV 67 - POLICE v K K MOHUR
Page 1 POLICE v K K MOHUR 2026 SAV 67 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAVANNE Cause No.: 1586/24 Police v/s Karan Kumar Mohur Judgment The accused stands charged with the offence of « Breach of Protection From Domestic Violence Act » in breach of Sections 2 and 13(2) of the Protection from Domestic Violence Act. As per the information...