Décisions de justice publiées par le cabinet
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 28 февраля 2024, n° [2024] EWHC 438 (Admin)
FORDHAM J: Adjournment 1. This is a permission-stage judicial review claim. The Claimant has appeared in person today and I have not needed to hear any submissions from him. I...
-
Family Court, 28 февраля 2024, n° [2024] EWFC 173
1. These proceedings concern a 14 year old girl (‘G’). Her mother is ‘M’ and her father is ‘F’. It is agreed that F has parental responsibility for G. The...
-
First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber), 28 февраля 2024, n° [2024] UKFTT 178 (TC)
Introduction 1. This was a hearing listed to consider the application dated 14 June 2023 by the appellant seeking permission to commence a late appeal against two discovery assessments issued...
-
High Court (Family Division), 28 февраля 2024, n° [2024] EWHC 583 (Fam)
Henke J: Introduction 1. This is my third judgment in relation to U. The first was handed down on 1 November 2023 ([2023] EWHC 3494 (Fam)). The second judgment related...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 28 февраля 2024, n° [2024] EWHC 428 (Admin)
FORDHAM J: Introduction 1. The Appellant has appeared in person with an interpreter. He is aged 48 and is wanted for extradition to the Czech Republic where he has 25...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 28 февраля 2024, n° [2024] EWHC 430 (Admin)
FORDHAM J: 1. The Appellant appears in person, by video-link, with an interpreter. He is aged 37 and wanted for extradition to Poland. The mixed Extradition Arrest Warrant was issued...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 28 февраля 2024, n° [2024] EWHC 418 (Admin)
Mr Justice Lane: 1. The claimant challenges, by way of judicial review, the decision of the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (RAVEC), communicated in a...
-
High Court (Insolvency and Companies List), 28 февраля 2024, n° [2024] EWHC 369 (Ch)
Chief ICC Judge Briggs: 1. OneStopMoneyManager Limited (the “Company”) had been authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority as an electronic money institution for issuance of electronic money. Authorisation was granted...
-
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber), 28 февраля 2024, n° [2024] UKUT 66 (IAC)
Introduction 1. These three appeals were listed together in order to permit the Upper Tribunal to resolve a number of issues of law concerning the SSHD’s power to deport EEA...
-
First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) – Information Rights, 28 февраля 2024, n° [2024] UKFTT 163 (GRC)
1. This is the second decision in an appeal under section 57 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, against the Information Commissioner’s Decision Notice IC – 185876-K2P7 which held...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 28 февраля 2024, n° [2024] EWCA Civ 170
Lord Justice Nugee: Introduction 1. These appeals from the County Court concern awards under the Party Wall etc. Act 1996 (“the Act”). The Appellant, Mr Robert Taylor, carried out work...
-
High Court (Administrative Court), 28 февраля 2024, n° [2024] EWHC 435 (Admin)
FORDHAM J: Introduction 1. The Appellant has appeared in person by video link. He is aged 60 and is wanted for extradition to Spain. The sole issue throughout his case...
-
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 28 февраля 2024, n° [2024] EWCA Civ 131
LORD JUSTICE BAKER : 1. For the reasons set out below, I have concluded that this appeal against an order for the return of two children to the United Arab...
-
First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber), 28 февраля 2024, n° [2024] UKFTT 179 (TC)
Form of hearing 1. The form of the hearing was V (video) via the Tribunal video hearing system. An in-person hearing was not held because of rail strikes making it...
-
First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber), 28 февраля 2024, n° [2024] UKFTT 177 (TC)
Introduction 1. This is a sad and unfortunate case which has its origins in a dispute with the respondents (“HMRC”) a number of decades ago. At the heart of that...
-
Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber), 28 февраля 2024, n° [2024] UKUT 71 (AAC)
The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to dismiss the appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal under reference EA/2022/0228, issued on 1 February 2023, did not involve the making...
-
Tribunal fédéral suisse, 28 февраля 2024, n° 8C 22-2024
Bundesgericht Tribunal fédéral Tribunale federale Tribunal federal 8C_22/2024 Sentenza del 28 febbraio 2024 IV Corte di diritto pubblico Composizione Giudice federale Wirthlin, Presidente, Cancelliere Colombi. Partecipanti al procedimento A.________, ricorrente,...
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 28 февраля 2024, n° 2023-00724
Cour supérieure de justice, 28 février 2024, n° 2023-00724
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 28 февраля 2024, n° 2023-01137
Cour supérieure de justice, 28 février 2024, n° 2023-01137
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 28 февраля 2024, n° 2021-00753
Cour supérieure de justice, 28 février 2024, n° 2021-00753
-
Cour supérieure de justice, 28 февраля 2024, n° 2023-00078
Cour supérieure de justice, 28 février 2024, n° 2023-00078
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 28 февраля 2024, n° 5604/19.5T9LSB.S1-B
Relator: ANTERO LU?S. ? fundamento bastante para o deferimento do pedido de escusa, a circunst?ncia de o senhor conselheiro adjunto exercer fun??es na mesma sec??o que a senhora conselheira arguida...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 28 февраля 2024, n° 238/21.7GATVD.L1.S1
Relator: ERNESTO VAZ PEREIRA. I. O legislador na reforma de 2007 alterou no artigo 400?, n? 1, al. c), do CPP, a express?o ?que n?o ponham termo ? causa? por...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 28 февраля 2024, n° 115/19.1GCSTB.E1.S1
Relator: ERNESTO VAZ PEREIRA. I. Estabelece o art. 400?, n? 1, al. c), - para o qual remete o art. 432?, n? 1, al? b), ambos do CPP -, que...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 28 февраля 2024, n° 208/18.2IDBRG-A.S1
Relator: TERESA DE ALMEIDA. I. N?o ?, verdadeiramente, invocada, nem existe, contradi??o entre a fundamenta??o e a decis?o. II. Trata-se, antes, de uma diverg?ncia entre a aprecia??o que os requerentes...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 28 февраля 2024, n° 197/15.5PKLRS-E.S1
Relator: TERESA DE ALMEIDA. I. Disp?e o art. 465.? do CPP que ?Tendo sido negada a revis?o ou mantida a decis?o revista, n?o pode haver nova revis?o com o mesmo...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 28 февраля 2024, n° 2100/07.7TAOER-D.L1-A.S2
Relator: TERESA DE ALMEIDA. I. As decis?es em confronto (a recorrida e fundamento) t?m natureza diversa: uma decis?o singular e um ac?rd?o. II. A lei ?, como vimos, clara no...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 28 февраля 2024, n° 159/19.3T9FAR.E1.S1
Relator: PEDRO BRANQUINHO DIAS. I. Em mat?ria de despachos interlocut?rias, ter-se-? de entender que o ac?rd?o do TRE, na parte referente aos mesmos, porque n?o conheceu, a final, do objeto...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 28 февраля 2024, n° 576/23.4T9VLG.P1-A.S1
Relator: MARIA DO CARMO SILVA DIAS. I. Verifica-se que no ac?rd?o fundamento, para al?m de nem sequer se colocar a quest?o da atipicidade da conduta, como sucedeu no ac?rd?o recorrido,...
-
Supremo Tribunal de Justiça, 28 февраля 2024, n° 5604/19.5T9LSB.S1-C
Relator: ANA BARATA BRITO. A liga??o profissional e pessoal existente entre o juiz conselheiro requerente e a ju?za conselheira visada na instru??o de processo crime, decorrente do exerc?cio de fun??es...